![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE ACT LOZIS LOMBARDO CONSENT MORGAN JUDGMENTS CIVIL PENALTY DISGORGEMENT PREJUDGMENT SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT ROBERT WILLIAM DOUGLAS RUSSELL LOZIS BETH DISTRICT CONNECTICUT MEDIMMUNE ADMITTING DENYING ALLEGATIONS ENTRY JUDGMENT PERMANENTLY ENJOINING FUTURE VIOLATIONS PAYMENT AMOUNT |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Litigation Release No. 15456 August 21, 1997
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ROBERT J. YOUNG, WILLIAM
DOUGLAS
MORGAN, RUSSELL LOZIS AND BETH LOMBARDO, 3:95 CV 2106 (AHN) (D.
CONN.)
The Commission announced today that on July 15, 1997, the U.S.
District Court for the District of Connecticut entered final consent
judgments against Defendants Russell Lozis ("Lozis"), 49, and Beth
Lombardo
("Lombardo"), 42, the last two remaining defendants in this civil
injunctive action alleging unlawful insider trading. The Complaint
alleges
that Lozis and Lombardo, a married couple residing in East Hampton,
Connecticut, among others, purchased stock in MedImmune, Inc.
("MedImmune")
while in possession of material, nonpublic information concerning a
proposed collaboration agreement between MedImmune and Merck, Inc. to
develop an immunotherapy and vaccine for the virus that causes AIDS
using
MedImmune's monoclonal antibody technology.
Lozis and Lombardo, without admitting or denying the allegations
of
the Complaint, each consented to the entry of a final judgment
permanently
enjoining them from future violations of Section 10(b) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5. Lozis agreed to
pay
a total of $11,807.26 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest;
however,
payment of such amount was waived, and no civil penalty imposed, based
upon
his demonstrated inability to pay. Lombardo consented to pay a total
of
$2,565.03 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest.
Final consent judgments previously were entered against
Defendants
Robert J. Young ("Young") and William Douglas Morgan ("Morgan"). Young
and
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |