LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v TIMOTHY ROSS, DOUGLAS COATES, and JOHN D. PECKSKAMP, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15460, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO AGAINST THREE FORMER, Defendant: Timothy Ross, Douglas Coates, and John D. Peckskamp, Jr., Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15460, Ross, Complaint, Coates, Securities, Alleges, Exchange, Peckskamp, Violations, Accounting, Exchange Commission, Internal Accounting Controls, Exchange Act, Fraud, District, Officer, Books, Provisions, Future Healthcare, Revenue, Making False, Auditors, Reporting, Drugs, Chief, Entries, Losses, Filing, Entry, Federal Securities Laws, Practice , ContentID: 120242602

Case Documents
1 1997-08-27 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105696
4 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT
COATES
SECURITIES
ALLEGES
EXCHANGE
PECKSKAMP
VIOLATIONS
ACCOUNTING
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROLS
EXCHANGE ACT
FRAUD
DISTRICT
OFFICER
BOOKS
PROVISIONS
FUTURE HEALTHCARE
REVENUE
MAKING FALSE
AUDITORS
REPORTING
DRUGS
CHIEF
ENTRIES
LOSSES
FILING
ENTRY
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
PRACTICE





                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C.

     Litigation Release No. 15460 / August 27, 1997

     Accounting and Auditing Enforcement
     Release No. 945 / August 27, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. TIMOTHY ROSS, DOUGLAS COATES AND
JOHN
     D. PECKSKAMP, JR. (C-1-97-770)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") today filed
and
     simultaneously settled a financial fraud action in the United States
     District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against three former
     senior officers of Future Healthcare, Inc., a Cincinnati company
previously
     in the business of conducting clinical trials for new drugs used by
     pharmaceutical companies in the drug approval process.

          The complaint alleges that from 1992 through 1994 Timothy Ross,
Future
     Healthcare's former president and chief financial officer,
fraudulently
     overstated the company's revenues and earnings and concealed the fraud
by
     creating counterfeit documents, making false entries to Future
Healthcare's
     books and records and lying to the company's auditors.  The complaint
     further alleges that John D. Peckskamp, Jr., the company's former
chief
     executive officer and chairman of the board of directors, knowingly
failed
     to devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls and
aided
     and abetted the company's reporting and books and records violations.
The
     complaint also alleges that Douglas Coates, the company's former
     controller, made false accounting entries designed to conceal the
fraud.
     In addition, it alleges that Ross and Coates each sold large blocks
of
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. TIMOTHY ROSS,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed and simultaneously settled a financial
  • The complaint alleges that from 1992 through 1994 Timothy Ross,
  • Healthcare's former president and chief financial officer, fraudulently overstated the
  • The complaint further alleges that John D. Peckskamp, Jr., the company's former chief
  • The complaint also alleges that Douglas Coates, the company's former controller, made false
  • In addition, it alleges that Ross and Coates each sold large blocks of Future Healthcare
  • Ross also consented to a provision in the Final Judgment permanently barring him from serving
  • Rules of Practice, upon entry of the injunctions, that will bar Ross permanently and Coates
  • The complaint further alleges that Peckskamp adopted unrealistic and excessively optimistic
  • The complaint alleges that Ross and Coates violated the antifraud and certain other
  • 10of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b5 thereunder.
  •    |