LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MICHAEL J. RANDY, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15463, CourtName: THE COMMISSION MOVED THE COURT FOR AN ORDER OF CIVIL CONTEMPT AND, Defendant: Michael J. Randy, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15463, Commission, Contempt, Johnston, Interrogatories, Securities, Civil Contempt, Exchange, Act, Sanctions, Request, Dollar Ponzi Scheme, Fraudulent Certificates, Canadian Trade Bank, Underlying Complaint, Commission Charged Johnston, Violations, Thereunder, Failure, Requiring, Judgement, Costs, Attorneys Fees, Discovery Sanctions Set, Federal Rules, Civil Procedure, Contempt Motion, Ordered Johnston, Relief , ContentID: 120242599

Case Documents
1 1997-08-28 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105693
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONTEMPT
JOHNSTON
COURT
INTERROGATORIES
SECURITIES
CIVIL CONTEMPT
EXCHANGE
ACT
SANCTIONS
REQUEST
DOLLAR PONZI SCHEME
FRAUDULENT CERTIFICATES
CANADIAN TRADE BANK
UNDERLYING COMPLAINT
COMMISSION CHARGED JOHNSTON
VIOLATIONS
THEREUNDER
FAILURE
REQUIRING
JUDGEMENT
COSTS
ATTORNEYS FEES
DISCOVERY SANCTIONS SET
FEDERAL RULES
CIVIL PROCEDURE
CONTEMPT MOTION
COUNSEL
ORDERED JOHNSTON
RELIEF





                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     Litigation Release No. 15463 / August 28, 1997

     SEC v. Michael J. Randy, et al., N.D. IL, No. 94-C-5902, filed
September
     27, 1994.

     The Commission announced that on August 5, 1997, it filed a civil
contempt
     action against David Johnston (Johnston), a defendant in a $15
million
     dollar Ponzi Scheme involving fraudulent Certificates of Deposit
     purportedly issued by Canadian Trade Bank.  In the underlying
Complaint,
     the Commission charged Johnston and others with violations of
Sections
     5(a), 5(c), 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b)
and
     15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder.


     The Commission moved the Court for an order of civil contempt and
other
     sanctions for Johnston's failure to comply with Court orders dated
April
     23, 1997 and June 19, 1997 requiring him to answer Interrogatories
     propounded upon him by the Commission.  The Commission moved for
contempt
     as well as a judgment of default.  The Commission also moved for
costs,
     attorneys fees and other discovery sanctions set forth in Rule 37(b) of
the
     Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

     The Honorable Wayne Andersen heard the contempt motion on August 14.
     Johnston's counsel appeared via telephone and requested another
opportunity
     to answer the Interrogatories.  After consideration, the Court
granted
     counsel's request and ordered Johnston to answer and/or respond to
the
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • The Commission announced that on August 5, 1997, it filed a civil contempt action against
  • In the underlying Complaint, the Commission charged Johnston and others with violations of
  • 5, 5, 17of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10and 15of the Securities Exchange Act of
  • The Commission moved the Court for an order of civil contempt and other sanctions for
  • 23, 1997 and June 19, 1997 requiring him to answer Interrogatories propounded upon him by the
  • The Commission moved for contempt as well as a judgment of default.
  • The Commission also moved for costs, attorneys fees and other discovery sanctions set forth
  • The Honorable Wayne Andersen heard the contempt motion on August 14.
  • Johnston's counsel appeared via telephone and requested another opportunity to answer the
  • the Court granted counsel's request and ordered Johnston to answer and/or respond to the
  • The Court left open the available relief if the Interrogatories were not answered.
  •    |