LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ROB NITE, PHILIP L. THOMAS, and DAVID v SIMS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15472, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: TO THE COMMISSION S COMPLAINT FILED IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN LOS, Defendant: Rob Nite, Philip L. Thomas, and David V. Sims, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15472, Securities, Commission, Exchange Commission, Investment, Sims, Rob Nite, Thomas, David, Scheme, Age, Victims, Act, Philip, Civil, Banks, Complaint, Promises, Alleges, Funds, Fraud, Lawsuit, Resides, Hills, Prohibiting Future Violations, Promulgated Thereunder, Disgorgement, Gotten Gains, Plus Prejudgment, Civil Penalties , ContentID: 120242590

Case Documents
1 1997-09-04 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105684
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTMENT
DEFENDANTS
SIMS
ROB NITE
THOMAS
DAVID
SCHEME
AGE
VICTIMS
ACT
PHILIP
CIVIL
BANKS
COMPLAINT
PROMISES
ALLEGES
FUNDS
FRAUD
LAWSUIT
RESIDES
HILLS
PROHIBITING FUTURE VIOLATIONS
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
DISGORGEMENT
GOTTEN GAINS
PLUS PREJUDGMENT
CIVIL PENALTIES





                       U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     Litigation Release No. 15472 / September 4, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ROB NITE; PHILIP L. THOMAS; and
DAVID
     V. SIMS, Civil Action No. 97-6546 DDP(RZx) (C.D. Cal)

          On September 3, 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission
sued
     three Southern California businessmen alleging that they conducted a
multi-
     million dollar fraudulent investment scheme involving the fictional
trading
     of securities purportedly issued by major international banks.
According
     to the Commission's complaint filed in federal district court in Los
     Angeles, from July 1994 through October 1994, the defendants, Rob Nite,
age
     46, Philip L. Thomas, age 43, and David V. Sims, age 47, offered and
sold
     to the public interests in a bogus program to trade these purported
     securities, amassing approximately $3.7 million.  For their investment,
the
     victims were promised astronomical returns on relatively small
investments.
     Specifically, the complaint alleges that the defendants guaranteed
the
     victims that for an initial investment of either $50,000 or $150,000,
they
     would receive returns of $1 million per week for 40 weeks, or $40
million.
     Contrary to their promises, the defendants did not invest the
victims'
     funds, but instead misappropriated most, if not all, of the funds for
their
     own personal benefit, including donations to religious organizations,
     purchases of luxury automobiles and gifts to family members.

          The scheme allegedly perpetrated by the defendants is commonly
     referred to as a "prime bank" scheme, and has been the subject of
official
     warnings issued to investors by several federal agencies including
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SIMS, Civil Action No. 97-6546 DDP(C.D.
  • On September 3, 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued three Southern California
  • According to the Commission's complaint filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, from
  • Specifically, the complaint alleges that the defendants guaranteed the victims that for an
  • Contrary to their promises, the defendants did not invest the victims' funds, but instead
  • Defendant Nite is currently incarcerated in federal prison in Arizona serving a 44 month
  • who currently resides in Beverly
  • Hills, has previously been sued administratively by the Commission for causing a public
  • In the Matter of David Sims and Lewis Kurtz, Exchange Act Rel. 34-37031.
  • As part of its lawsuit, the Commission seeks permanent injunctions against the defendants
  • gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest and civil penalties.
  •    |