LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v PHOENIX CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, MICHAEL T. HONEY, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15480, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: ON MAY 28, 1997, THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT, Defendant: Phoenix Continental Corporation, Michael T. Honey, and Robert Johnston, Plaintiff: SEC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15480, Phoenix, Securities, Johnston, Commission, Honey, Complaint, Investors, Exchange Commission, Permanent, Violations, Financing, Sale, Florida, Aircraft, Phoenix Continental Corporation, Michael, Robert, District, Permanent Injunctions, Enjoins, Act, Selling, Offering, Investors Funds, Laws, Disclose, History, Securities Industry, Defendants Misrepresented Phoenix, Financial Position , ContentID: 120242582

Case Documents
1 1997-09-08 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105676
3 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
JOHNSTON
COMMISSION
HONEY
COMPLAINT
INVESTORS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PERMANENT
VIOLATIONS
FINANCING
SALE
FLORIDA
AIRCRAFT
PHOENIX CONTINENTAL CORPORATION
MICHAEL
ROBERT
DISTRICT
PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS
ENJOINS
ACT
SELLING
OFFERING
INVESTORS FUNDS
LAWS
DISCLOSE
HISTORY
SECURITIES INDUSTRY
DEFENDANTS MISREPRESENTED PHOENIX
FINANCIAL POSITION





                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


     Litigation Release No. 15480 / September 8, 1997

     Securities and Exchange Commission v. Phoenix Continental
Corporation,
     Michael T. Honey, and Robert Johnston, Civil Action No. 97-6600-Civ
Davis

          The Securities and Exchange Commission ( Commission ) announced
that
     on May 28, 1997, the Federal District Court for the Southern District
of
     Florida entered permanent injunctions against Phoenix Continental
     Corporation ( Phoenix ), Michael T. Honey ( Honey ), and Robert
Johnston
     ( Johnston ), and appointed a Special Master to marshal the assets of
     Phoenix. The Order enjoins Phoenix, Honey, and Johnston from future
     violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933,
     and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b
5
     thereunder. Phoenix, Honey, and Johnston consented to the entry of
the
     permanent injunctions without admitting or denying the Commission s
     allegations.

          Phoenix, a Florida Corporation with its principal offices in
Pembroke
     Pines, is engaged in the business of refurbishing, leasing, selling,
and
     financing the sale of used aircraft in the small to medium size range
to
     corporations and individuals. Honey, of Boca Raton, Florida, is Phoenix
s
     president, and Johnston, of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, is Phoenix s
vice-
     president. Phoenix represented that money raised through the sale of
     promissory notes ( Notes ) was to provide the financial base from
which
     borrowers could finance aircraft leases and purchases.

SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on May 28, 1997, the Federal District
  • The Order enjoins Phoenix, Honey, and Johnston from future violations of Sections 5, 5, and
  • and Section 10of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b
  • Phoenix, Honey, and Johnston consented to the entry of the permanent injunctions without
  • a Florida Corporation with its principal offices in Pembroke
  • Pines, is engaged in the business of refurbishing, leasing, selling, and financing the sale
  • According to the Complaint, Phoenix fraudulently raised $11.3 million through the sale of the
  • The Commission alleged in its Complaint that Phoenix falsely represented in its offering
  • The Complaint also alleged that Phoenix failed to disclose to investors that Johnston has a
  • The Complaint further alleged that the defendants misrepresented Phoenix s financial position
  •    |