LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v THE BETTER LIFE CLUB OF AMERICA, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15737, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIV. NO. 95-1679, Defendant: The Better Life Club Of America, Inc., and Robert N. Taylor, Michael Missal, Receiver, James E. Washington Et Al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15737, Dreams Defendants, District, Life Club, Judge Hogan, Receiver, Investors, Pool, Columbia, Ponzi Scheme, Creditors, Washington, Robert, Taylor, United States District, States District Court, Profits, Lit, Commission, Advertising Pool, Amounts, Tfh, Michael, James, Summary Judgment, Pay, Funds, Disgorge, Intent, Hinder , ContentID: 120242333

Case Documents
1 1998-05-14 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105426
3 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DISTRICT
LIFE CLUB
JUDGE HOGAN
COURT
RECEIVER
INVESTORS
POOL
COLUMBIA
PONZI SCHEME
CREDITORS
WASHINGTON
ROBERT
TAYLOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
STATES DISTRICT COURT
PROFITS
LIT
COMMISSION
ADVERTISING POOL
AMOUNTS
TFH
MICHAEL
JAMES
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PAY
FUNDS
DISGORGE
INTENT
HINDER




     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
     Washington, D.C.


     Litigation Release No.  15737 / May 14, 1998

     SEC v. THE BETTER LIFE CLUB OF AMERICA, INC., and ROBERT N. TAYLOR,
United
     States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civ. No. 95-1679
(TFH);
     MICHAEL MISSAL, Receiver, v. JAMES E. WASHINGTON et al., United States
     District Court for the District of Columbia, Civ. No. 97-982 (TFH).

     The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has
granted
     summary judgment to Michael J. Missal, the court-appointed receiver for
the
     Better Life Club of America, Inc., in his lawsuit against James
Washington,
     Jacob Haynes, Dreams Unlimited, and Concepts Unlimited (the  Dreams
     Defendants ).  Judge Thomas F. Hogan ordered the Dreams Defendants to
pay
     to the receiver all of the profits they made from investing in the
Better
     Life Club  Advertising Pool,  a Ponzi scheme in which thousands of
     investors lost more than $26 million.  Judge Hogan found that these
     defendants received at least $2.7 million.  All of the moneys
recovered
     will be added to the pool of funds that will be distributed to the
victims
     of the Better Life Club Ponzi scheme.  Not including the amounts to be
     repaid by the Dreams Defendants and others who have been ordered to
     disgorge investor funds, that pool currently contains approximately
$2.4
     million.

     In his decision, which was issued on April 17, 1998, Judge Hogan found
that
     the Dreams Defendants, on behalf of themselves and their family and
     friends, invested more than $5 million in the Better Life Club
Advertising
     Pool  from February 1994 through August 1995.  Although the Better
Life
     Club promised to pay the Dreams Defendants a 100 percent return in 60
SNIPPETS:
  • Washington, D.C.
  • THE BETTER LIFE CLUB OF AMERICA, INC., and ROBERT N. TAYLOR, United
  • States District Court for the District of Columbia,
  • MICHAEL MISSAL, Receiver, v. JAMES E. WASHINGTON et al., United States District Court for the
  • No. 97-982 (TFH).
  • The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has granted summary judgment to
  • Judge Thomas F. Hogan ordered the Dreams Defendants to pay to the receiver all of the profits
  • Life Club Advertising Pool, a Ponzi scheme in which thousands of investors lost more than $26
  • Judge Hogan found that these defendants received at least $2.7 million.
  • All of the moneys recovered will be added to the pool of funds that will be distributed to
  • Club promised to pay the Dreams Defendants a 100 percent return in 60 days, they promised
  • Noting that the Dreams Defendants themselves had stated in court filings that their profits
  • The legal basis of Judge Hogan s ruling was the District of Columbia Uniform Fraudulent
  • Judge Hogan also refused to give the Dreams Defendants a set-off for the amounts they paid to
  • The Commission filed its underlying action against the Better Life Club and its founder,
  • N. Taylor, on September 1, 1995.
  • for summary judgment in that action on February 27,
  • See SEC Lit.
  •    |