LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v PHEBE W. ERDMAN, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15742, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DEFENDANTS) (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN, Defendant: Phebe W. Erdman, Hans L. Erdman and David M. Lemon (defendants) and Rebecca W. Erdman and Leslie Chekin (relief defendants), Plaintiff: SEC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15742, Erdman, Securities, Commission, Stock, Itc, Chekin, Complaint, Lemon, District, Exchange Commission, Violations, Proceeds, David, Complaint Alleges, Investors, Public Offering, Act, Relief Defendants, Southern Florida, Civil Action, Fraudulent, Selling, Antifraud Provisions, Misrepresenting, Businesses, Finance, Federal Securities Laws, Sales , ContentID: 120242328

Case Documents
1 1998-05-15 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105421
3 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
STOCK
ITC
CHEKIN
COMPLAINT
LEMON
DISTRICT
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
VIOLATIONS
PROCEEDS
DAVID
COURT
COMPLAINT ALLEGES
INVESTORS
PUBLIC OFFERING
ACT
RELIEF DEFENDANTS
SOUTHERN FLORIDA
CIVIL ACTION
FRAUDULENT
SELLING
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
MISREPRESENTING
BUSINESSES
FINANCE
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
SALES




     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


     LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15742 / May 15, 1998

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. PHEBE W. ERDMAN, HANS L. ERDMAN
AND
     DAVID M. LEMON (Defendants) and REBECCA W. ERDMAN AND LESLIE CHEKIN
(Relief
     Defendants) (United States District Court for the District of Southern
     Florida, Civil Action No. 98-6500-Civ-Moore).

     The Securities and Exchange Commission ( Commission ) announced today
that
     it filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the
     District of Southern Florida against Phebe W. Erdman ( P. Erdman ) of
     Greensboro, North Carolina, Hans L. Erdman ( H. Erdman ) of Blaine,
     Minnesota, and David M. Lemon ( Lemon ) of Marietta, Georgia as
defendants,
     and Rebecca W. Erdman ( R. Erdman ) of Greensboro, North Carolina and
     Leslie Chekin ( Chekin ) of Springfield, Virginia, as relief
defendants,
     for their participation in a fraudulent, unregistered offering of
     securities.  The Commission s Complaint alleges that P. Erdman, H.
Erdman,
     R. Erdman, and Chekin received $240,000 by selling approximately
370,000
     shares of stock in a worthless shell company, International Trade &
     Commerce Corp. ( ITC ) to 40 investors, many of whom were residents of
     Southern Florida.  Defendants P. Erdman, H. Erdman and Lemon solicited
     investors by misrepresenting that ITC would acquire other businesses,
     realize substantial revenues and finance acquisitions through a public
     offering of stock.  The Complaint alleges that P. Erdman and H. Erdman
     violated the registration provisions of the federal securities laws,
and P.
     Erdman, H. Erdman and Lemon violated the antifraud provisions.  The
     Complaint also alleges that relief defendants R. Erdman and Chekin
were
     unjustly enriched by the proceeds of fraudulent, unregistered sales of
ITC
     stock and therefore should be required to return such proceeds to
     investors.

     The Complaint alleges that since approximately 1988, ITC was controlled
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • DAVID M. LEMON (Defendants) and REBECCA W. ERDMAN AND LESLIE CHEKIN (Relief Defendants)
  • shares of stock in a worthless shell company, International Trade & Commerce Corp. (ITC) to
  • Defendants P. Erdman, H. Erdman and Lemon solicited investors by misrepresenting that ITC
  • The Complaint alleges that P. Erdman and H. Erdman violated the registration provisions of
  • The Complaint also alleges that relief defendants R. Erdman and Chekin were unjustly enriched
  • stock and therefore should be required to return such proceeds to investors.
  • The defendants predicted $100 million is sales and over $17 million in earnings in the coming
  • The defendants failed to disclose that ITC was a shell company with no assets or operations
  • and Section 10of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b
  • thereunder, and against Lemon, prohibiting him from future violations of Section 17of the
  • disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest, from P. Erdman, H. Erdman, R. Erdman and Chekin of
  • These proceedings were instituted to determine whether Barr violated the registration and
  •    |