LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v GEORGE WALLACE STEWART, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15752, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: A. PRESKA OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT, Defendant: George Wallace Stewart, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15752, Stewart, Securities, Exchange Commission, Investment, Civil Action, Judgement, Money, Civ, District, Complaint, Fraudulent, Participations, Investment Programs, Instruments, Relief Defendants, Violating, Act, Fraudulent Investment Scheme, Antifraud Provisions, Federal Securities Laws, Admitting, Denying, Allegations, Entry, Thereunder, Judgment Waives Disgorgement, Civil Money Penalties, Pay , ContentID: 120242318

Case Documents
1 1998-05-21 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105411
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
DEFENDANTS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTMENT
CIVIL ACTION
JUDGEMENT
MONEY
LITIGATION
CIV
DISTRICT
COMPLAINT
FRAUDULENT
PARTICIPATIONS
INVESTMENT PROGRAMS
INSTRUMENTS
RELIEF DEFENDANTS
VIOLATING
ACT
FRAUDULENT INVESTMENT SCHEME
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
ADMITTING
DENYING
ALLEGATIONS
ENTRY
THEREUNDER
JUDGMENT WAIVES DISGORGEMENT
CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES
PAY






     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
     Washington, D.C.

     Litigation Release No. 15752  /  May 21, 1998


     Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stewart, et al., Civil Action
     No. 98 CIV 2636  (S.D.N.Y.)



         The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the Honorable
Loretta
     A. Preska of the United States District Court of the Southern District
of
     New York has entered a final judgment against George Wallace Stewart in
SEC
     v. Stewart, et al., Civil Action No. 98 CIV 2636 (LAP)(S.D.N.Y.).  On
April
     14, 1998, the Commission filed a complaint alleging as follows:
Stewart
     along with four other individuals and five related entities
fraudulently
     obtained more than $1.7 million, from at least three individuals, by
     offering and selling securities in the form of participations in
investment
     programs purportedly to trade  prime bank  instruments.  The
investment
     programs were scams, the instruments themselves bogus.  Instead of
using
     the money as promised, Stewart and the other defendants misappropriated
the
     investors  funds for their own benefit, transferring portions of the
money
     to at least one individual and three entities, who were named as
relief
     defendants.  By participating in this fraudulent investment scheme,
Stewart
     and the other defendants violated the antifraud provisions of the
federal
     securities laws.

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stewart, et al., Civil Action No. 98 CIV 2636
  • Preska of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York has entered a
  • 14, 1998, the Commission filed a complaint alleging as follows: Stewart along with four other
  • The investment programs were scams, the instruments themselves bogus.
  • Instead of using the money as promised, Stewart and the other defendants misappropriated the
  • By participating in this fraudulent investment scheme, Stewart and the other defendants
  • Stewart consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, to the
  • 10of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
  • The final judgment waives disgorgement and civil money penalties were not imposed against
  • Litigation continues as to the remaining nine defendants and four relief defendants.
  •    |