LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v WALTER CLARENCE BUSBY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15760, Defendant: Walter Clarence Busby, Plaintiff: SEC, State: GA Georgia, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15760, Busby, Securities, Exchange Commission, Investors, Pay, Prime Bank, Prime Bank Schemes, United States, Walter Clarence Busby, District, Permanent, Relief, Violations, Act, Disgorgement, Amount, Representing, Prejudgment, Complaint, Selling Investment Contracts, Connection, Misrepresentations, Omissions, Raised Money, Purported Trading Programs, Fraudulently Representing, Risk Free, Ventures, Ranging, Exorbitant , ContentID: 120242310

Case Documents
1 1998-05-28 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105403
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTORS
PAY
PRIME BANK
PRIME BANK SCHEMES
UNITED STATES
WALTER CLARENCE BUSBY
DISTRICT
PERMANENT
RELIEF
VIOLATIONS
ACT
DISGORGEMENT
AMOUNT
REPRESENTING
PREJUDGMENT
COMPLAINT
SELLING INVESTMENT CONTRACTS
CONNECTION
MISREPRESENTATIONS
OMISSIONS
RAISED MONEY
PURPORTED TRADING PROGRAMS
FRAUDULENTLY REPRESENTING
RISK FREE
VENTURES
RANGING
EXORBITANT







     UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     Litigation Release No.  15760 / May 28, 1998

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. WALTER CLARENCE BUSBY,
     Civil Action No. 1: 97-CV-2653 (N.D. Ga.)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on May 1,
1998,
     the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, United States District Judge for the
     Northern District of Georgia, entered an order of permanent injunction
and
     other relief against Walter Clarence Busby ("Busby").  The order
     permanently enjoins Busby from future violations of Section 17(a) of
the
     Securities Act of 1993 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
     1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.  Busby was ordered to pay disgorgement
in
     the amount of $15,000 representing the gains he received from sales of
     interests in three prime bank schemes, along with prejudgment interest
     thereon. Payment of the disgorgement and prejudgment interest was
waived
     based upon Busby s sworn financial statement which indicate an
inability to
     pay the ordered amounts.

          Busby consented to the relief without admitting or denying the
     allegations set forth in a complaint, filed by the Commission on
September
     11, 1997.  In its complaint, the Commission alleged that Busby violated
the
     antifraud provisions of the securities laws by offering and selling
     investment contracts in connection with three different prime bank
schemes.
     Using misrepresentations and omissions in each of the three schemes,
Busby
     raised money for purported trading programs in "prime bank" notes by
     fraudulently representing to investors that the investments were risk
free
     and that the ventures would pay returns ranging from 750% to 10,000%.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. WALTER CLARENCE BUSBY,
  • the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, United States District Judge for the Northern District of
  • The order permanently enjoins Busby from future violations of Section 17of the Securities Act
  • Busby was ordered to pay disgorgement in the amount of $15,000 representing the gains he
  • Busby consented to the relief without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in a
  • In its complaint, the Commission alleged that Busby violated the antifraud provisions of the
  • Using misrepresentations and omissions in each of the three schemes, Busby raised money for
  • None of the investors earned the exorbitant returns promised by Busby.
  •    |