![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION INVESTORS PAY PRIME BANK PRIME BANK SCHEMES UNITED STATES WALTER CLARENCE BUSBY DISTRICT PERMANENT RELIEF VIOLATIONS ACT DISGORGEMENT AMOUNT REPRESENTING PREJUDGMENT COMPLAINT SELLING INVESTMENT CONTRACTS CONNECTION MISREPRESENTATIONS OMISSIONS RAISED MONEY PURPORTED TRADING PROGRAMS FRAUDULENTLY REPRESENTING RISK FREE VENTURES RANGING EXORBITANT |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 15760 / May 28, 1998
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. WALTER CLARENCE BUSBY,
Civil Action No. 1: 97-CV-2653 (N.D. Ga.)
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on May 1,
1998,
the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Georgia, entered an order of permanent injunction
and
other relief against Walter Clarence Busby ("Busby"). The order
permanently enjoins Busby from future violations of Section 17(a) of
the
Securities Act of 1993 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Busby was ordered to pay disgorgement
in
the amount of $15,000 representing the gains he received from sales of
interests in three prime bank schemes, along with prejudgment interest
thereon. Payment of the disgorgement and prejudgment interest was
waived
based upon Busby s sworn financial statement which indicate an
inability to
pay the ordered amounts.
Busby consented to the relief without admitting or denying the
allegations set forth in a complaint, filed by the Commission on
September
11, 1997. In its complaint, the Commission alleged that Busby violated
the
antifraud provisions of the securities laws by offering and selling
investment contracts in connection with three different prime bank
schemes.
Using misrepresentations and omissions in each of the three schemes,
Busby
raised money for purported trading programs in "prime bank" notes by
fraudulently representing to investors that the investments were risk
free
and that the ventures would pay returns ranging from 750% to 10,000%.
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |