LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15779, Defendant: Craig Ryan Spradling, Plaintiff: SEC, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15779, Craig Ryan Spradling, Loctite, Complaint, Alleges, Tender, Exchange, Commission, Schwab, Securities, Purchase, Henkel, Exchange Act, Client, Common Stock, Illegal Trading Profits, Brokerage Account, Prior, Antifraud, Civil, Law Firm, Planned Tender, According, Outstanding, General Antifraud, Antifraud Provisions, Preparation, Judgement, Permanently Enjoining, Violating , ContentID: 120242291

Case Documents
1 1998-06-11 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105384
4 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LOCTITE
COMPLAINT
ALLEGES
TENDER
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SCHWAB
SECURITIES
PURCHASE
HENKEL
EXCHANGE ACT
CLIENT
COMMON STOCK
ILLEGAL TRADING PROFITS
BROKERAGE ACCOUNT
PRIOR
ANTIFRAUD
LITIGATION
CIVIL
LAW FIRM
PLANNED TENDER
ACCORDING
OUTSTANDING
GENERAL ANTIFRAUD
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
PREPARATION
JUDGEMENT
PERMANENTLY ENJOINING
VIOLATING




     UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     LITIGATION RELEASE NO.  15779 / June 11, 1998

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  v. CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING,
     98 Civ. 4117 (MBM) (S.D.N.Y.)

     The Commission announced today that it filed a civil complaint charging
a 25 year old
     associate of a prominent law firm with insider trading.  Specifically,
the Complaint
     alleges that the associate defrauded his employer and one of its
clients by buying
     options to purchase common stock of a company that was the target of a
planned tender
     offer by that client.

     Named in the Commission s Complaint is:

     CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING, an attorney currently associated with the law
firm Cleary,
     Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton (Cleary ) in its London office.  At the time
of the
     transactions and events alleged in the Complaint, CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING
worked in
     Cleary's New York Office.

     The Complaint alleges that CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING made illegal profits of
approximately
     $49,000 by purchasing Loctite Corp. ( Loctite ) call options on October
24, 1996.
     According to the Complaint, Henkel KGaA ( Henkel ) announced on Monday,
October 28, 1996,
     that it intended to acquire the outstanding shares of Loctite at $56
per share
     ( Announcement ).  Prior to the announcement of that tender offer,
Clearly allegedly
     acted as counsel to Henkel.

     CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING allegedly purchased, on October 24, 1996, 65
December Loctite $50
     call options for approximately $6,000 through a securities brokerage
account he maintained
     with Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ( Schwab ), a registered broker-dealer.
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING,
  • The Commission announced today that it filed a civil complaint charging a 25 year old
  • the Complaint alleges that the associate defrauded his employer and one of its clients by
  • CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING, an attorney currently associated with the law firm Cleary, Gottlieb,
  • The Complaint alleges that CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING made illegal profits of approximately $49,000
  • According to the Complaint, Henkel KGaA announced on Monday, October 28, 1996, that it
  • CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING allegedly purchased, on October 24, 1996, 65 December Loctite $50 call
  • According to the Complaint, CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING submitted to Schwab on October 23, 1996, the
  • In the weeks prior to the announcement, CRAIG RYAN SPRADLING, while an associate at Cleary,
  • The Commission seeks a final judgment: permanently enjoining
  • from violating the general antifraud and tender offer antifraud provisions of the Securities
  • The litigation is pending.
  •    |