LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ALBERT E. CARTER, KELLY POLATIS and EUNICE POLATIS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15787, Defendant: Albert E. Carter, Kelly Polatis and Eunice Polatis, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15787, Polatis, Carter, Bonds, Securities, Investors, Kelly Polatis, Eunice Polatis, Civil, Complaint, Alabama, Relief Defendants, Assets, Exchange, Commission, Albert, Sold, Railway, United States, Alleges, Act, Freeze, Thereon, Imposition, Civil Money Penalties, Honorable Dee, Benson, District, Judge, Order Freezing , ContentID: 120242282

Case Documents
1 1998-06-19 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105375
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
CARTER
BONDS
SECURITIES
INVESTORS
KELLY POLATIS
EUNICE POLATIS
CIVIL
COMPLAINT
ALABAMA
RELIEF DEFENDANTS
ASSETS
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
ALBERT
SOLD
RAILWAY
UNITED STATES
ALLEGES
ACT
FREEZE
THEREON
IMPOSITION
CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES
HONORABLE DEE
BENSON
DISTRICT
JUDGE
ORDER FREEZING




     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
     Washington, D.C.

     Litigation Release No.  15787 / June 19, 1998

     SEC v. Albert E. Carter, Kelly Polatis and Eunice Polatis, Civil Action

     No. 2:98CV 0440B, (USDC D.Ut.)(June 18, 1998)

     On June 18, 1998, a civil complaint was filed against Albert E.
Carter,
     Kelly Polatis and Eunice Polatis alleging the defendants have, since
at
     least March 1997, been perpetrating a securities fraud by selling over
$3.5
     million of nineteenth century state and railroad bonds, which have
only
     nominal value as collectibles, to investors as investment vehicles
capable
     of generating extraordinary returns to those investors.  The bonds
being
     sold by the defendants were issued by the Chicago, Saginaw & Canada
Railway
     Co. in 1873, the East Alabama & Cincinnati Railway Co.in 1870 and by
the
     State of Mississippi in 1838.  The defendants have represented among
other
     things that the bonds are redeemable in gold and are guaranteed by the
     United States government; Carter has also represented that the East
Alabama
     bonds are guaranteed by the State of Alabama.  It is also alleged that
     Carter has sold interests in an offshore investment program into which
he
     claims the nineteenth century bonds can be placed, generating annual
     returns of 100% to 500%.

     The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Section 17(a) of
the
     Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
     1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.  As part of the complaint, the
Commission
     seeks, among other relief:  a preliminary injunction; a freeze of the
     defendants  assets; a freeze of the assets of Valice Ltd. LLC, Duro
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SEC v. Albert E. Carter, Kelly Polatis and Eunice Polatis, Civil Action
  • On June 18, 1998, a civil complaint was filed against Albert E. Carter, Kelly Polatis and
  • million of nineteenth century state and railroad bonds, which have only nominal value as
  • The bonds being sold by the defendants were issued by the Chicago,
  • the East Alabama & Cincinnati Railway Co.in 1870 and by the State of Mississippi in 1838.
  • The defendants have represented among other things that the bonds are redeemable in gold and
  • It is also alleged that Carter has sold interests in an offshore investment program into
  • The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Section 17of the Securities Act of 1933
  • As part of the complaint, the Commission seeks, among other relief: a preliminary injunction;
  • L.C. and Iron Horse One, Inc., three relief defendants who received proceeds of sales by the
  • Also on June 18, 1998, the Honorable Dee V. Benson, United States District
  • Judge, issued an order freezing the assets of Carter, Kelly Polatis, Eunice
  • Polatis and the three relief defendants.
  •    |