![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES INVESTMENTS CAI ACCOUNT EXCHANGE COMMISSION CLIENTS PETER JOSEPH CAMMARANO PERMANENT FUNDS COMPLAINT PURCHASING CUSTOMERS ACT ALLEGATIONS CAMMARANO SOLICITED CLIENTS LIQUIDATE RETIREMENT MONEY CAI BUSINESS ACCOUNT STATED PURPOSE CONFIRMATIONS ACCOUNT STATEMENTS CAI LETTERHEAD REFLECTING REPRESENTATIONS BANK ACCOUNTS ORDER PERMANENTLY ENJOINS ENGAGING VIOLATIONS THEREUNDER |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO.16045 / January 26, 1999
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PETER JOSEPH CAMMARANO AND
CAMMARANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC., H-98-3707, USDC, SD/TX (Houston
Division)
On January 19, 1999, an Order of Permanent Injunction and Other
Equitable Relief was entered against Peter Joseph Cammarano
("Cammarano"), a former licensed securities salesman, and his
company,
Cammarano & Associates ("CAI"), whom the Commission charged with
misappropriation of approximately $1.5 million of investor funds from
at least 24 investors. Cammarano and CAI were also ordered to pay
disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and a civil penalty to be set by
agreement of the parties, or by the Court. Cammarano and CAI
consented
to the entry of the order without admitting or denying the
allegations
in the Commission’s complaint.
The Commission's complaint alleged that Cammarano solicited
clients to liquidate or transfer their retirement money and other
investments to a CAI business account for the stated purpose of
purchasing securities and other investments in those accounts.
Cammarano provided his customers with confirmations and account
statements on CAI letterhead, reflecting that securities or other
investments had purportedly been purchased for the customers'
account;
however, contrary to Cammarano's representations to his clients,
Cammarano deposited the clients' funds into bank accounts that he
controlled.
The order permanently enjoins Cammarano and CAI from engaging in
further violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933,
and
Sections 10(b) and 15(a)(1)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |