LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SAMIR TRABOULSI, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16058, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IV., Defendant: Samir Traboulsi, et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16058, Socofinance, Ghanem, Commission, Exchange Act, Complaint, International Discount Bank, Discount Bank, Trust, Profits, Settlements, District, Triangle, Trading, Tender, Reiplinger, Securities, Samir Traboulsi, Judgments, Permanent Injunction, Future Violations, Thereunder, Disgorgement, Illegal Profits, Prejudgment, Swiss, Theret, Switzerland, Shares, Account , ContentID: 120242054

Case Documents
1 1999-02-11 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105147
3 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
GHANEM
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE ACT
COMPLAINT
INTERNATIONAL DISCOUNT BANK
DISCOUNT BANK
TRUST
PROFITS
SETTLEMENTS
DISTRICT
TRIANGLE
TRADING
DEFENDANTS
TENDER
REIPLINGER
SECURITIES
SAMIR TRABOULSI
JUDGMENTS
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
THEREUNDER
DISGORGEMENT
ILLEGAL PROFITS
PREJUDGMENT
SWISS
THERET
SWITZERLAND
SHARES
ACCOUNT
                U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
                        Washington, D.C.

     Litigation Release No.  16058 / February 11, 1999

     SECURITIES  AND  EXCHANGE  COMMISSION v. SAMIR TRABOULSI, ET. ALS.,
U.S.
     District Court for the Southern  District  of  New  York  (97 Civ.
5759)
     (RPP)

     SEC SETTLES WITH TWO FOR $4.2 MILLION IN TRIANGLE INDUSTRIES INSIDER
     TRADING CASE; TOTAL RECOVERIES NOW $ 5.7 MILLION

          The United States District Court for the Southern  District  of
New
     York  Monday  entered  final judgments of permanent injunction and
other
     relief against Socofinance,  S.A.  and  Charbel Ghanem.  Both
defendants
     had previously been charged along with six  other  foreign nationals
and
     another foreign entity with insider trading before the 1988 tender
offer
     for Triangle Industries, Inc. by Pechiney Corporation. The judgments,
to
     which Socofinance and Ghanem consented without admitting  or denying
the
     allegations   in  the  Commission’s  Complaint,  provide  for
permanent
     injunctions against future violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of
the
     Securities Exchange  Act  of  1934  ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5
and
     14e-3  thereunder, disgorgement of the  approximately  $3.6  million
in
     illegal  profits  that  have  been frozen in Switzerland and
prejudgment
     interest totaling $720,000.

          The Commission’s Complaint alleged that Ghanem was tipped about
the
     tender offer by his friend, Samir Traboulsi, who served as an advisor
to
     Triangle  during  the tender offer  negotiations.   The  Complaint
also
     alleged that Ghanem, a Swiss national born in Lebanon, who was a
founder
     and  director of a Swiss  currency  brokerage  firm,  Socofinance,
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (97 Civ.
  • York Monday entered final judgments of permanent injunction and other relief against
  • Both defendants had previously been charged along with six other foreign nationals and
  • The judgments, to which Socofinance and Ghanem consented without admitting or denying the
  • The Commission’s Complaint alleged that Ghanem was tipped about the tender offer by his
  • The Complaint also alleged that Ghanem, a Swiss national born in Lebanon, who was a founder
  • The Complaint alleged that Ghanem controlled both Socofinance and International Discount Bank
  • After the tender offer, the 91,000 shares in the Socofinance account were sold for profits of
  • Including the monies to be disgorged by Ghanem and Socofinance, the Commission has now
  • Each of those defendants was permanently enjoined from future violations of Exchange Act
  •    |