LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v HAHN TRUONG, HIEU TRUONG, HEN TRUONG, NINA VINH, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16080, Defendant: Hahn Truong, Hieu Truong, Hen Truong, Nina Vinh, Mike Pirbazari and Christopher Nguyen, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16080, Securities, Truong, Molecular Shares, Vinh, Sold, Exchange Commission, Judgement, Hieu Truong, Sister, Hahn Truong, Hen Truong, Nina Vinh, Mike Pirbazari, Civil, Enjoining, Violating, Complaint, Alleges, Selling, Friend, Act, Sister Avoided Losses, Avoided Losses Totaling, Selling Profits, Future Violations, Thereunder, Entry, Admitting, Denying, Allegations , ContentID: 120242032

Case Documents
1 1999-03-09 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105125
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TRUONG
MOLECULAR SHARES
VINH
SOLD
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
JUDGEMENT
HIEU TRUONG
SISTER
HAHN TRUONG
HEN TRUONG
NINA VINH
MIKE PIRBAZARI
CIVIL
ENJOINING
VIOLATING
COMPLAINT
ALLEGES
SELLING
FRIEND
ACT
SISTER AVOIDED LOSSES
AVOIDED LOSSES TOTALING
SELLING PROFITS
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
THEREUNDER
ENTRY
ADMITTING
DENYING
ALLEGATIONS

                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



          Litigation Release No.  16080 / March 9, 1999

          Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hahn Truong, Hieu Truong,
          Hen Truong, Nina Vinh, Mike Pirbazari and Christopher Nguyen,
          Civil Action No. C-98-21137 SW (N.D. Cal.)

               The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
          announced that on February 23, 1999, the Honorable Spencer
          Williams, Senior United States District Judge, entered a final
          judgment against Nina Vinh ("Vinh") permanently enjoining her
          from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities
          laws.  The final judgment also sets disgorgement of Vinh’s ill-
          gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest, at $18,601.26 and
          imposes a civil penalty of $15,250.00.

               The Commission’s complaint, filed on November 16, 1998,
          alleges that Hahn Truong used confidential corporate information
          in selling shares in his then-employer, Molecular Dynamics, Inc.
          ("Molecular"), and tipped his brothers Hieu Truong ("Hieu") and
          Hen Truong, and his friend Christopher Nguyen, each of whom sold
          all of his Molecular shares and sold short additional Molecular
          shares.  The Commission’s complaint further alleges that Hieu in
          turn tipped his sister-in-law, Vinh, who sold all of her
          Molecular shares, sold short additional Molecular shares and
          tipped her sister and her friend, Mike Pirbazari, each of whom
          sold all of her/his Molecular shares.  The defendants and Vinh’s
          sister avoided losses totaling $294,151 and made short selling
          profits of $134,985.

               The final judgment enjoins Vinh from future violations of
          Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
          Rule 10b-5 thereunder.  Vinh consented to the entry of the final
          judgment without admitting or denying the Commission’s
          allegations.








SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hahn Truong, Hieu Truong, Hen Truong, Nina Vinh, Mike
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on February 23, 1999, the Honorable
  • The Commission’s complaint, filed on November 16, 1998, alleges that Hahn Truong used
  • The Commission’s complaint further alleges that Hieu in turn tipped his sister-in-law, Vinh,
  • The defendants and Vinh’s sister avoided losses totaling $294,151 and made short selling
  • The final judgment enjoins Vinh from future violations of Section 17of the Securities Act of
  • Vinh consented to the entry of the final judgment without admitting or denying the
  •    |