U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16090 / March 18, 1999
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marisa Baridis, et
al., 98 Civ. 8535 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y.)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Howard Boyar, 99 Civ.
2008 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y.)
BROKERS SETTLE INSIDER TRADING CASE
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced
that Jeffrey L. Streich, the remaining defendant in the
Commission’s insider trading case filed on December 3, 1998,
has settled the Commission’s charges against him. The
Commission’s Complaint in that matter alleged insider
trading by Streich and others in advance of public
announcements concerning the securities of thirteen publicly
traded companies. The Complaint alleged that Streich
received tips concerning these companies from Marisa
Baridis, a former employee in the compliance departments of
two Wall Street investment firms who had access to material
nonpublic information concerning the firms’ clients. The
Complaint also alleged that Streich tipped at least ten
other persons, and that he engaged in a free-riding scheme
whereby he purchased stock without paying for it and without
enough cash to buy it on margin. See SEC v. Marisa Baridis
et al., 98 Civil No. 8535 (JSM)(S.D.N.Y.).
Streich consented, without admitting or denying the
Commission’s allegations, to the entry of a Final Judgment
permanently enjoining him from violating Sections 7(f),
10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
("Exchange Act"), Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 thereunder, and
Regulation X of the Federal Reserve Board Regulations, and
ordering him to disgorge his and his tippees’ trading
profits of $1,039,970, plus prejudgment interest. Based on
his demonstrated inability to pay, disgorgement was waived.
As an additional part of the settlement, Streich consented
to the entry of a Commission Order barring him from
association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities
dealer, investment adviser or investment company. The
Order, which the Commission entered today, is based on
Streich’s earlier criminal conviction in New York State
Supreme Court of two felony counts relating to his theft of
securities from a brokerage customer and his possession of a
forged margin account agreement with knowledge that it was
forged and with the intent to defraud.
SNIPPETS:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marisa Baridis,
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Howard Boyar,
BROKERS SETTLE INSIDER TRADING CASE
Commission’s insider trading case filed on December 3, 1998,
trading by Streich and others in advance of public
announcements concerning the securities of thirteen publicly
The Complaint alleged that Streich
to the entry of a Final Judgment
Regulation X of the Federal Reserve Board Regulations,
profits of $1,039,970, plus prejudgment interest.
association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities
dealer, investment adviser or investment company.
Streich’s earlier criminal conviction in New York State
the United States District Court for the Southern District
The Complaint alleges that Boyar engaged in insider trading
and requiring him to disgorge
settlement, Boyar has consented to the entry of a Commission
Order barring him from association with any broker, dealer,
earlier pleaded guilty in New York Supreme Court to state
Securities Exchange Act
District Attorney for New York County, the New York Stock
|