LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MARISA BARIDIS, et al., and HOWARD BOYAR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16090, CourtCode: SM, CourtName: SUPREME COURT OF TWO FELONY COUNTS RELATING TO HIS THEFT OF, Defendant: Marisa Baridis, et al., and Howard Boyar, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16090, Securities, Exchange, Commission, Complaint, Boyar, Trading, Streich, York, Alleges, Investment, Broker, Insider Trading, Securities Exchange Act, Profits, Settlement, Entry, Disgorge, Dealer, District, Marisa Baridis, Announcements, Stock, Order Barring, Supreme Court, Regulation, Plus Prejudgment, Municipal Securities, Investment Adviser, Brokerage Customer, Southern District , ContentID: 120242021

Case Documents
1 1999-03-18 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105114
3 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
BOYAR
TRADING
STREICH
YORK
ALLEGES
INVESTMENT
BROKER
INSIDER TRADING
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
PROFITS
SETTLEMENT
ENTRY
DISGORGE
DEALER
DISTRICT
MARISA BARIDIS
ANNOUNCEMENTS
STOCK
ORDER BARRING
SUPREME COURT
REGULATION
PLUS PREJUDGMENT
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES
INVESTMENT ADVISER
BROKERAGE CUSTOMER
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
                       U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   WASHINGTON, D.C.

             LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16090 / March 18, 1999

             Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marisa Baridis, et
             al., 98 Civ. 8535 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y.)
             Securities and Exchange Commission v. Howard Boyar, 99 Civ.
             2008 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y.)

                         BROKERS SETTLE INSIDER TRADING CASE

                  The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced
             that Jeffrey L. Streich, the remaining defendant in the
             Commission’s insider trading case filed on December 3, 1998,
             has settled the Commission’s charges against him.  The
             Commission’s Complaint in that matter alleged insider
             trading by Streich and others in advance of public
             announcements concerning the securities of thirteen publicly
             traded companies.  The Complaint alleged that Streich
             received tips concerning these companies from Marisa
             Baridis, a former employee in the compliance departments of
             two Wall Street investment firms who had access to material
             nonpublic information concerning the firms’ clients.  The
             Complaint also alleged that Streich tipped at least ten
             other persons, and that he engaged in a free-riding scheme
             whereby he purchased stock without paying for it and without
             enough cash to buy it on margin.  See SEC v. Marisa Baridis
             et al., 98 Civil No. 8535 (JSM)(S.D.N.Y.).

                  Streich consented, without admitting or denying the
             Commission’s allegations, to the entry of a Final Judgment
             permanently enjoining him from violating Sections 7(f),
             10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
             ("Exchange Act"), Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 thereunder, and
             Regulation X of the Federal Reserve Board Regulations, and
             ordering him to disgorge his and his tippees’ trading
             profits of $1,039,970, plus prejudgment interest.  Based on
             his demonstrated inability to pay, disgorgement was waived.
             As an additional part of the settlement, Streich consented
             to the entry of a Commission Order barring him from
             association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities
             dealer, investment adviser or investment company.  The
             Order, which the Commission entered today, is based on
             Streich’s earlier criminal conviction in New York State
             Supreme Court of two felony counts relating to his theft of
             securities from a brokerage customer and his possession of a
             forged margin account agreement with knowledge that it was
             forged and with the intent to defraud.
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marisa Baridis,
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Howard Boyar,
  • BROKERS SETTLE INSIDER TRADING CASE
  • Commission’s insider trading case filed on December 3, 1998,
  • trading by Streich and others in advance of public
  • announcements concerning the securities of thirteen publicly
  • The Complaint alleged that Streich
  • to the entry of a Final Judgment
  • Regulation X of the Federal Reserve Board Regulations,
  • profits of $1,039,970, plus prejudgment interest.
  • association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities
  • dealer, investment adviser or investment company.
  • Streich’s earlier criminal conviction in New York State
  • the United States District Court for the Southern District
  • The Complaint alleges that Boyar engaged in insider trading
  • and requiring him to disgorge
  • settlement, Boyar has consented to the entry of a Commission
  • Order barring him from association with any broker, dealer,
  • earlier pleaded guilty in New York Supreme Court to state
  • Securities Exchange Act
  • District Attorney for New York County, the New York Stock
  •    |