LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DEBISYS, INC., MARK T. FLANAGAN, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16331, Defendant: Debisys, Inc., Mark T. Flanagan, and James S. Eberhart, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16331, Investors, Securities, Terminals, Cards, Exchange Commission, Debisys, Investor Funds, Representing, Civil, Flanagan, Eberhart, Unregistered Securities, Point-of-sale Terminals, Misrepresentations, Permanent Injunctions, Violations, Act, Pay, Penalties, Satisfy, Buy-back Obligations, Reasonable Expectation, Secure, Entry, Antifraud, Broker-dealer Registration Provisions, Settlement, Complaint, Disgorgement , ContentID: 120241779

Case Documents
1 1999-10-07 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104872
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
DEFENDANTS
TERMINALS
CARDS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DEBISYS
INVESTOR FUNDS
REPRESENTING
CIVIL
FLANAGAN
EBERHART
UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
POINT-OF-SALE TERMINALS
MISREPRESENTATIONS
PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS
VIOLATIONS
ACT
PAY
PENALTIES
SATISFY
BUY-BACK OBLIGATIONS
REASONABLE EXPECTATION
SECURE
ENTRY
ANTIFRAUD
BROKER-DEALER REGISTRATION PROVISIONS
SETTLEMENT
COMPLAINT
DISGORGEMENT
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

   Litigation Release No. 16331/ October 7, 1999

   , Civil Action No. 99-1237 (EEx) (C.D. Cal.)

   On October 7, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued
   Debisys, Inc., and its principals Mark T. Flanagan and James S.
   Eberhart, both of Costa Mesa, for fraudulently selling $2.3 million in
   unregistered securities to 150 investors nationwide from January
   through July 1997.

   Defendants sold unregistered securities in the form of investment
   contracts for a sale-leaseback program for point-of-sale terminals.
   Point-of-sale terminals process retail forms of payment, including ATM
   cards, debit cards, credit cards, check guarantee cards, and "smart"
   cards. Defendants made several material misrepresentations to
   investors. First, Defendants misrepresented the use of investor funds,
   falsely representing that they would use investor funds to purchase
   the terminals, when, in fact, Defendants paid approximately 66 percent
   of investor funds for sales commissions, administrative costs, and
   "returns" to investors. Second, Defendants represented that Debisys
   would re-purchase the terminals at the end of the four-year lease for
   the full amount of the investment, but Defendants failed to disclose
   that they were not financially able to satisfy the buy-back
   obligations and had no reasonable expectation that they would be able
   to do so in the future. Defendants also represented that they would
   file the necessary forms to secure the investors interests in the
   terminals but they did not do so.

   Debisys and Flanagan consented to the entry of permanent injunctions
   against violations of the antifraud, securities registration, and
   broker-dealer registration provisions of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and
   17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. Flanagan's
   settlement did not require him to pay penalties because he
   demonstrated that he was unable to pay them. The Complaint also seeks
   a permanent injunction, disgorgement, and civil penalties against
   Eberhart for the same violations.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 10/22/1999
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Defendants sold unregistered securities in the form of investment contracts for a
  • Point-of-sale terminals process retail forms of payment, including ATM cards, debit cards,
  • Defendants made several material misrepresentations to investors.
  • First, Defendants misrepresented the use of investor funds, falsely representing that they
  • Second, Defendants represented that Debisys would re-purchase the terminals at the end of the
  • Defendants also represented that they would file the necessary forms to secure the investors
  • Debisys and Flanagan consented to the entry of permanent injunctions against violations of
  • Flanagan's settlement did not require him to pay penalties because he demonstrated that he
  • The Complaint also seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement, and civil penalties against
  •    |