LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ABS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16344, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: FILED A COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN, Defendant: ABS Industries, Inc., et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: OH Ohio, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16344, Abs, Sales, Complaint, Mccarthy, Ursu, Alleges, Ohio, Mchale, Bush, Scheme, Bill, Accounting, Overstating, Improper, Officer, Report, Income, Fraudulent Scheme, Securities, Exchange Commission, Abs Industries, Colfor, Colmach, Earnings, Improperly Recording, Reason, Manager, Misstatements, Projections , ContentID: 120241766

Case Documents
1 1999-10-27 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104859
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SALES
COMPLAINT
MCCARTHY
URSU
ALLEGES
OHIO
MCHALE
BUSH
SCHEME
BILL
ACCOUNTING
DEFENDANTS
OVERSTATING
IMPROPER
OFFICER
REPORT
INCOME
FRAUDULENT SCHEME
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ABS INDUSTRIES
COLFOR
COLMACH
EARNINGS
IMPROPERLY RECORDING
REASON
MANAGER
MISSTATEMENTS
PROJECTIONS
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Litigation Release No. 16344 / October 28, 1999

   Accounting Auditing and Enforcement Release No. 1197 / October 28,
   1999

   S.E.C. v. ABS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., (N.D. OH., CASE NO. 1
   99CV2600, FILED OCTOBER 27, 1999)

   On October 27, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
   filed an action charging that ABS Industries, Inc. (ABS), an Ohio
   company, and four former officers or employees of ABS defrauded
   investors in the company's stock by intentionally overstating the
   company's revenues by millions of dollars in 1994 and the first three
   quarters of the company's 1995 fiscal year. Specifically, the SEC
   filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern
   District of Ohio, Eastern Division, against ABS, formerly
   headquartered in Willoughby, Ohio, William J. McCarthy (McCarthy) of
   Ashtabula, Ohio, Theodore Ursu III (Ursu) of Highland Heights, Ohio,
   John M. McHale (McHale) of Massillon, Ohio, and David R. Bush (Bush),
   of Malvern, Ohio. ABS was formerly the holding company for two
   wholly-owned subsidiaries, Colfor, Inc. (Colfor) and Colmach, Inc.
   (Colmach), which produced and machined cold and warm forgings for the
   automotive and light truck industries. McCarthy was the President and
   Chief Executive Officer of ABS. Ursu was ABS' Chief Accounting Officer
   and Corporate Controller. McHale was the Controller for Colfor and
   Colmach, and Bush was Colfor's general manager.

   This case involves misstatements arising from an intentional scheme by
   ABS' management to manage earnings. The SEC's Complaint alleges that
   ABS, McCarthy, Ursu, McHale and Bush engaged in a scheme to
   prematurely recognize revenue by improperly recording purported "bill
   and hold" sales at ABS. The Complaint further alleges that the sales
   recorded as "bill and hold" sales were for goods that were neither
   billed nor shipped to the customers, and, in some cases, did not exist
   or were not completely manufactured. The Complaint further alleges
   that the reason the Defendants engaged in this scheme was to meet
   prior sales projections established by McCarthy. For example, the
   Complaint alleges that the Defendants improperly recorded nearly $4.5
   million in "bill and hold" sales in 1994 to meet McCarthy's projection
   in ABS' 1993 annual report that the company's sales would increase to
   "approximately $93,000,000" in 1994. As a result of the inclusion of
   the improper "bill and hold" sales, ABS posted sales of more than
   $92.1 million in its 1994 Form 10-K, which overstated, among other
   things, its sales by at least 3.21%, income before taxes by at least
   2.48%, and accounts receivable by at least 16.35%. The Complaint
   alleges that reasonable investors would have considered such
SNIPPETS:
  • On October 27, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed an action charging that ABS
  • ABS was formerly the holding company for two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Colfor, Inc. and
  • Ursu was ABS' Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller.
  • McHale was the Controller for Colfor and Colmach, and Bush was Colfor's general manager.
  • The SEC's Complaint alleges that ABS, McCarthy, Ursu, McHale and Bush engaged in a scheme to
  • The Complaint further alleges that the reason the Defendants engaged in this scheme was to
  • For example, the Complaint alleges that the Defendants improperly recorded nearly $4.5
  • As a result of the inclusion of the improper "bill and hold" sales, ABS posted sales of more
  • The Complaint alleges that reasonable investors would have considered such differences - in
  • ABS also failed to disclose a material change in accounting policy and misrepresented the
  • The Complaint also alleges the Defendants lied to ABS' auditors regarding the true nature of
  • These misstatements resulted in the company reporting gains when it otherwise would have
  •    |