LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DONALD BARRY TAMRES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16369, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: , U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN OF INDIANA, CIVIL ACTION NO. I, Defendant: Donald Barry Tamres, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16369, Investment, Tamres, Complaint, Securities, Indiana, Asset Enhancement Program, Complaint Alleges, Purchase, District Court, Funds, Homes, Exchange Act, Fictitious Prime Bank, Materials, Yield, Insurance, According, Pay, Low Entry, High Yield Trading, Federal Reserve, European Insurance Company, Hintocks Circle, Cars, Purchase Personal Items, Pay Personal Expenses, Furnish, Purchase Corporate Boxes, Tickets, Indiana Pacers , ContentID: 120241741

Case Documents
1 1999-11-23 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104834
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TAMRES
COMPLAINT
SECURITIES
INDIANA
ASSET ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
COMPLAINT ALLEGES
PURCHASE
DISTRICT COURT
FUNDS
HOMES
EXCHANGE ACT
FICTITIOUS PRIME BANK
MATERIALS
YIELD
INSURANCE
ACCORDING
PAY
LOW ENTRY
HIGH YIELD TRADING
FEDERAL RESERVE
EUROPEAN INSURANCE COMPANY
HINTOCKS CIRCLE
CARS
PURCHASE PERSONAL ITEMS
PAY PERSONAL EXPENSES
FURNISH
PURCHASE CORPORATE BOXES
TICKETS
INDIANA PACERS
   Securities and Exchange Commission

   Litigation Release No. 16369 / November 23, 1999

   , U.S. District Court for the Southern of Indiana, Civil Action No. I
   P99 - 1767 C - Y/G (S.D. Ind. November 16, 1999)

   On November 19, 1999, the Honorable Richard L. Young of the U.S.
   District Court for the Southern District of Indiana issued an order
   freezing the assets of Donald Barry Tamres of Carmel, Indiana. Three
   days prior, the SEC filed a complaint alleging that Tamres operated a
   fictitious Prime Bank investment program in which he misappropriated
   approximately $2.8 million from 25 investors.

   The Complaint alleges that Tamres violated the federal securities laws
   through a fictitious Prime Bank investment called the Asset
   Enhancement Program. The Complaint alleges that Tamres described the
   investment in offering materials as a "low entry" "high yield trading
   program" in which an approximate $35,000 initial investment would
   yield $1,750,000 in six weeks. Tamres also, in the materials, claimed
   that the program was associated with the Federal Reserve and is
   guaranteed by an insurance policy issued by "a top 4 European
   Insurance Company." According to the Complaint, approximately 25
   investors invested a total of about $2.8 million in the Asset
   Enhancement Program. In fact, this type of investment program does not
   exist. The Complaint alleges that Tamres misappropriated the
   investors' funds.

   According to the Complaint, Tamres, instead of using the funds raised
   to invest in the Asset Enhancement Program or similar investments,
   used the funds to, among other things 1) purchase several homes,
   including the property and home located at 3552 Hintocks Circle; 2)
   purchase several cars; 3) purchase personal items; 4) pay personal
   expenses; 5) furnish the homes; 6) purchase corporate boxes and
   tickets to the Indiana Pacers; and 7) pay returns to other investors.

   The Complaint alleges that Tamres violated Sections 5(a) and 17(a) of
   the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 11/26/1999
SNIPPETS:
  • , U.S. District Court for the Southern of Indiana, Civil Action No.
  • the SEC filed a complaint alleging that Tamres operated a fictitious Prime Bank investment
  • The Complaint alleges that Tamres violated the federal securities laws through a fictitious
  • The Complaint alleges that Tamres described the investment in offering materials as a "low
  • Tamres also, in the materials, claimed that the program was associated with the Federal
  • According to the Complaint, approximately 25 investors invested a total of about $2.8 million
  • The Complaint alleges that Tamres misappropriated the investors' funds.
  • According to the Complaint, Tamres, instead of using the funds raised to invest in the Asset
  • The Complaint alleges that Tamres violated Sections 5and 17of the Securities Act of 1933 and
  •    |