LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CHARLES D. LEDFORD Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16381, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: STEPHEN P. MICKLE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN, Defendant: Charles D. Ledford, Plaintiff: SEC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16381, Exchange, Ledford, Eco2, Securities, Exchange Commission, Charles, Exchange Act, Tire, Permanent Injunction, Tire Recovery System, Spm, Fla, District, Florida, Violations, Thereunder, Civil, Complaint, Stock, Pyrolysis Process, Recycle Scrap Tires, Carbon Black, Steel, Methane Gas By-products, According, Issuing Press, Negotiations, Purchase, Future Revenues, Eco Jet Systems , ContentID: 120241729

Case Documents
1 1999-12-08 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104822
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LEDFORD
ECO2
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
CHARLES
EXCHANGE ACT
TIRE
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
TIRE RECOVERY SYSTEM
SPM
FLA
DISTRICT
FLORIDA
VIOLATIONS
THEREUNDER
CIVIL
COMPLAINT
STOCK
PYROLYSIS PROCESS
RECYCLE SCRAP TIRES
CARBON BLACK
STEEL
METHANE GAS BY-PRODUCTS
ACCORDING
ISSUING PRESS
NEGOTIATIONS
PURCHASE
FUTURE REVENUES
ECO JET SYSTEMS
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Litigation Release No. 16381 / December 8, 1999

   FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION ENTERED AGAINST CHARLES D.
   LEDFORD

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHARLES D. LEDFORD, Case No.
   99-CV-27 SPM (N.D. Fla.)

   The Commission announced that on September 23, 1999, the Honorable
   Stephen P. Mickle of the United States District Court for the Northern
   District of Florida entered a permanent injunction against Charles D.
   Ledford, with his consent, permanently enjoining him from violations
   of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and
   directing him to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $25,000.
   Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles D. Ledford , Civil
   Action No. 99-CV-27 SPM (N.D. Fla.).

   The Commission's Complaint alleged that from at least March 1995
   through early 1997, Ledford caused ECO2, Inc. ("ECO2"), to issue false
   and misleading press releases designed to attract new investors to
   ECO2 and artificially inflate the price of ECO2's publicly traded
   stock, a penny stock within the meaning of Sections 15(b)(6) and
   3(a)(51) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").
   ECO2, a Delaware company formerly headquartered in Hawthorne, Florida,
   established to provide solid waste tire management services to
   governmental, commercial and industrial entities through sales of a
   "tire recovery system" that purportedly utilized a pyrolysis process
   to recycle scrap tires into oil, carbon black, steel and methane gas
   by-products. According to the Commission's complaint, Ledford violated
   Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by issuing
   press releases regarding negotiations between ECO2 and various
   entities for the purchase of ECO2's tire recovery systems, and at
   least one press release regarding present and future revenues of an
   ECO2 subsidiary, ECO Jet Systems, Inc.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 12/13/1999
SNIPPETS:
  • FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION ENTERED AGAINST CHARLES D. LEDFORD
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHARLES D. LEDFORD,
  • The Commission announced that on September 23, 1999, the Honorable Stephen P. Mickle of the
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles D. Ledford, Civil Action No. 99-CV-27 SPM (N.D.
  • Fla.).
  • The Commission's Complaint alleged that from at least March 1995 through early 1997, Ledford
  • ECO2, a Delaware company formerly headquartered in Hawthorne, Florida, established to provide
  • According to the Commission's complaint, Ledford violated Section 10of the Exchange Act and
  •    |