LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MICHELLE NGUYEN, LISA NGUYEN and HAO VU Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16398, Defendant: Michelle Nguyen, Lisa Nguyen and Hao Vu, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16398, Trimedyne Stock, Purchase, Securities, Fda Clearance, Shares, Exchange Commission, Judgments, Civil Penalties, Judgments Permanently Enjoin, Sister, Brother, Complaint, Account, District, California, Future Violations, Payment, Disgorgement, Trading, Profits, Entry, Admitting, Denying, Allegations, Market, Urolase, Imminent, Prior, Sold, Combined Profit , ContentID: 120241712

Case Documents
1 2000-01-04 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104805
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PURCHASE
SECURITIES
FDA CLEARANCE
SHARES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
JUDGMENTS
CIVIL PENALTIES
JUDGMENTS PERMANENTLY ENJOIN
SISTER
BROTHER
COMPLAINT
ACCOUNT
DISTRICT
CALIFORNIA
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
PAYMENT
DISGORGEMENT
TRADING
PROFITS
ENTRY
ADMITTING
DENYING
ALLEGATIONS
MARKET
UROLASE
IMMINENT
PRIOR
SOLD
COMBINED PROFIT
   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Litigation Release No. 16398 / January 4, 2000

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MICHELLE NGUYEN, LISA NGUYEN AND
   HAO VU, Civil Action No. SACV 99-830 AHS (ANx) (C.D. Cal.)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that
   on November 18, 1999, the Honorable Alicemarie H. Stotler, United
   States District Judge for the Central District of California, entered
   final judgments of permanent injunction and other relief against
   Michelle Nguyen ("Nguyen") and her sister and brother, Lisa Nguyen
   ("L. Nguyen") and Hao Vu ("Vu"), all of whom are residents of Orange
   County, California. The final judgments permanently enjoin Nguyen, L.
   Nguyen and Vu from future violations of the antifraud provisions of
   the federal securities laws and require payment of disgorgement of and
   interest on insider trading profits plus civil penalties. Nguyen, L.
   Nguyen and Vu consented to the entry of the final judgments without
   admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint.

   In its complaint, the Commission alleged that the three defendants
   purchased Trimedyne stock based upon nonpublic information about an
   action taken by the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). In March
   1996, the FDA cleared Trimedyne to market a medical laser (the
   "Urolase") for the treatment of prostate enlargement. One week later,
   Trimedyne publicly announced that clearance. Nguyen was Trimedyne's
   controller, and in that capacity, learned that the company had
   received notice from the FDA that the clearance to market the Urolase
   was "imminent." After learning that FDA clearance was imminent, Nguyen
   purchased 1,000 shares of Trimedyne stock. One day after the company
   received the FDA clearance, but prior to any public announcement of
   the development, Nguyen purchased an additional 1,100 shares of
   Trimedyne stock in her daughter's account. Nguyen purchased an
   additional 2,000 shares of Trimedyne stock in her own account in the
   week prior to the company's public announcement of the FDA clearance.

   The Commission also alleged that, in addition to trading on her own
   behalf, Nguyen tipped her sister and brother about the FDA clearance.
   On the same day Nguyen made her second purchase of Trimedyne stock,
   her sister, L. Nguyen, purchased 4,966 shares of Trimedyne stock in
   four different accounts, and her brother, Vu, purchased 4,000 shares
   of Trimedyne stock. After the announcement, Nguyen, L. Nguyen and Vu
   sold all of their shares of Trimedyne stock, making a combined profit
   of $82,967.87.

   Nguyen, L. Nguyen and Vu, without admitting or denying the allegations
   in the complaint, consented to entry of judgments permanently
   enjoining them from future violations of Section 17(a) of the
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MICHELLE NGUYEN, LISA NGUYEN AND HAO VU, Civil Action
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on November 18, 1999, the Honorable
  • Nguyen") and Hao Vu, all of whom are residents of Orange County, California.
  • The final judgments permanently enjoin Nguyen, L. Nguyen and Vu from future violations of the
  • L. Nguyen and Vu consented to the entry of the final judgments without admitting or denying
  • In its complaint, the Commission alleged that the three defendants purchased Trimedyne stock
  • the FDA cleared Trimedyne to market a medical laser (the "Urolase") for the treatment of
  • After learning that FDA clearance was imminent, Nguyen purchased 1,000 shares of Trimedyne
  • One day after the company received the FDA clearance, but prior to any public announcement of
  • The Commission also alleged that, in addition to trading on her own behalf, Nguyen tipped her
  • On the same day Nguyen made her second purchase of Trimedyne stock, her sister, L. Nguyen,
  • After the announcement, Nguyen, L. Nguyen and Vu sold all of their shares of Trimedyne stock,
  •    |