SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16616 / June 30, 2000
Court Enters Preliminary Injunction Against Fraudulent Internet A "Virtual
Stock Exchange" and Continues Freeze of Assets
On June 29, 2000, after a hearing, the United States District Court
for the District of Massachusetts entered a Preliminary Injunction and
Order for Other Relief in a case against SG Limited and SG Perfect
Limited, based on allegations that SG Limited operated a massive
pyramid scheme involving the offering of investments in a so-called
"virtual company" over the Internet. The Court's Order, among other
things, continues the previously ordered freeze of assets of SG and SG
Perfect Limited until the case is completed. At the conclusion of the
case, if defendant is found liable, the Commission has asked the court
to order distribution of the frozen proceeds of the fraud to injured
investors.
The Commission"s complaint, which was filed on June 9, alleges that SG
Limited, based on the Caribbean island of Dominica, operates a website
under the name "StockGeneration, promising investors a risk-free,
guaranteed return of 10% per month, or 215% per year on a compounded
basis. SG allegedly described itself as a "virtual stock exchange"
offering investments in the stock of several "virtual companies,"
including one referred to as the "privileged company" whose shares
"only rise" and generate the guaranteed 10% monthly return. The
Commission alleged that the investment program, which raised hundreds
of thousands, if not millions, of dollars was actually nothing more
than a classic pyramid scheme. The Commission further alleged that
investors did not receive the guaranteed return and have not even been
able to recover their initial investments. According to the
Commission's complaint, in fact, in recent weeks, SG informed
investors that their purported guaranteed, risk-free investments had
been reduced to only pennies on the dollar. The Commission alleges
that, even while unable to meet its obligations to existing investors,
SG continues to offer its investment program on the StockGeneration
website, still promising a risk-free guaranteed 10% monthly return.
The Commission's complaint alleges that SG Limited has violated the
general antifraud and securities registration provisions of the
federal securities laws -- that is, Sections 5(a) and (c) and 17 (a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission's
complaint also charged as a relief defendant an affiliated company, SG
Perfect Limited, which was unjustly enriched through the receipt of
over $1 million of the money raised from the StockGeneration scheme.
On June 9, 2000, the U.S. District Court for the District of
SNIPPETS:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Stock Exchange" and Continues Freeze of Assets
On June 29, 2000, after a hearing, the United States District Court for the District of
The Court's Order, among other things, continues the previously ordered freeze of assets of
At the conclusion of the case, if defendant is found liable, the Commission has asked the
SG allegedly described itself as a "virtual stock exchange" offering investments in the stock
The Commission alleged that the investment program, which raised hundreds of thousands, if
According to the Commission's complaint, in fact, in recent weeks, SG informed investors that
The Commission alleges that, even while unable to meet its obligations to existing investors,
After obtaining the emergency relief the Commission succeeded in freezing certain assets of
In addition to the emergency relief it obtained, the Commission is seeking an order
A user friendly form to assist you in making a report is available at the SEC Home Page
|