LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MARK GATCH and HENRY BENJAMIN SCHMIDT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16618, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO HAS HELD THAT, Defendant: Mark Gatch and Henry Benjamin Schmidt, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OH Ohio, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16618, Schmidt, Securities, Investment, Act, Violation, Exchange Commission, Investment Adviser, Judge Beckwith, Disgorgement, Mark Gatch, Ohio, Provisions, Unregistered Investment Adviser, Fund, Amounts, Penalties, Henry Benjamin, District, Federal Securities Laws, Co-founder, Civil, Representations, Thereunder, Sold, Promissory, Assisting, Independent Annual Audit, Clients , ContentID: 120241495

Case Documents
1 2000-07-03 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104588
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
INVESTMENT
ACT
VIOLATION
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
COURT
INVESTMENT ADVISER
JUDGE BECKWITH
DISGORGEMENT
LITIGATION
MARK GATCH
OHIO
PROVISIONS
UNREGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISER
FUND
AMOUNTS
PENALTIES
HENRY BENJAMIN
DISTRICT
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
CO-FOUNDER
CIVIL
REPRESENTATIONS
THEREUNDER
SOLD
PROMISSORY
ASSISTING
INDEPENDENT ANNUAL AUDIT
CLIENTS
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16618 \ July 3, 2000

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. MARK GATCH AND HENRY BENJAMIN
   SCHMIDT, Case No. C-1-97-599 (SSB) (S.D. Ohio, W.D.)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that in a decision
   dated June 9, 2000, the Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith of the United
   States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio has held that
   Henry Benjamin Schmidt violated the antifraud provisions, as well as
   other provisions, of the federal securities laws. Schmidt, age 66,
   resides in St. Petersburg, Florida. Schmidt co-founded, owned, and
   operated Ben Mar Investments, Inc. ("Ben Mar"), an unregistered
   investment adviser in the Greater Cincinnati area. Ben Mar effectively
   operated as a Ponzi scheme from 1992 through March 1995, resulting in
   investor losses in excess of $12 million. Mark Gatch, the co-founder
   and owner of Ben Mar, of Amelia, Ohio, previously settled the
   Commission´s civil action against him, and is serving a five-year
   prison term in connection with his operation of Ben Mar.

   The Court, in ruling for the Commission on all counts of the
   complaint, found that Schmidt
     * Recklessly made representations to investors regarding Ben Mar´s
       trading strategy and performance, in violation of Section 17(a) of
       the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), Section 10(b) of
       the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule
       10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment
       Advisers Act of 1940 (AAdvisers Act@). The Court found that
       Schmidt acted with scienter, failing to make even the most
       elementary inquiries of Gatch or to seek basic information
       regarding Ben Mar´s holdings or performance, in an extreme
       departure from the standards of reasonable care he owed to
       investors.
     * Sold unregistered securities in violation of Section 5 of the
       Securities Act. Schmidt sold promissory notes that promised
       interest based on the performance of an investment pool managed by
       Ben Mar (the "Ben Mar Fund"). In soliciting investors, Schmidt
       told investors that they could expect to earn profits on their
       investment of 4% to 5% per month, based on past performance.
     * Aided and abetted Gatch´s violations of Section 203 of the
       Advisers Act by assisting in Ben Mar´s operation as an
       unregistered investment adviser.
     * Failed to provide for an independent annual audit of funds and
       securities held on behalf of clients, in violation of Section
       206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-2 thereunder.

   Judge Beckwith permanently enjoined Schmidt from further violations of
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. MARK GATCH AND HENRY BENJAMIN
  • SCHMIDT,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that in a decision dated June 9, 2000, the
  • Schmidt co-founded, owned, and operated Ben Mar Investments, Inc., an unregistered investment
  • Mark Gatch, the co-founder and owner of Ben Mar, of Amelia, Ohio, previously settled the
  • The Court, in ruling for the Commission on all counts of the complaint, found that Schmidt *
  • * Sold unregistered securities in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act.
  • Schmidt sold promissory notes that promised interest based on the performance of an
  • * Aided and abetted Gatch´s violations of Section 203 of the Advisers Act by assisting in Ben
  • * Failed to provide for an independent annual audit of funds and securities held on behalf of
  • Judge Beckwith permanently enjoined Schmidt from further violations of these provisions of
  • Judge Beckwith further ordered that Schmidt disgorge over $1.8 million dollars in ill-gotten
  • Judge Beckwith found that third-tier civil penalties against Schmidt were also appropriate,
  • For further information, see Litigation Release No. 15394 and Litigation Release No. 15530.
  •    |