LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v REFAEL SHAOULIAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16621, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: SEC V. REFAEL SHAOULIAN, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT, Defendant: Refael Shaoulian, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16621, Shaoulian, Complaint, Manipulations, Commission, Internet, Stock, Message Boards, Amended Complaint, Alleges, Profits, Securities, District, Original Complaint, Price, Shares, California, Father, Ill-gotten Gains, Civil, Ucla, Charges, Disgorgement, Brother, Penalties, Beverly Hills, According, Otc Bulletin Board, Buying, Computers , ContentID: 120241492

Case Documents
1 2000-07-06 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104585
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT
MANIPULATIONS
COMMISSION
INTERNET
STOCK
MESSAGE BOARDS
AMENDED COMPLAINT
ALLEGES
PROFITS
SECURITIES
DISTRICT
COURT
ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
PRICE
SHARES
CALIFORNIA
FATHER
ILL-GOTTEN GAINS
CIVIL
UCLA
CHARGES
DISGORGEMENT
BROTHER
PENALTIES
BEVERLY HILLS
ACCORDING
OTC BULLETIN BOARD
BUYING
COMPUTERS
   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Litigation Release No. 16621 / July 6, 2000

   SEC v. REFAEL SHAOULIAN, U.S. District Court for the Central District
   of California, Civ. Action No. 00-04614 (CBM) (C. D. Cal. May 3, 2000)
   as amended (July 6, 2000)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on May 3, 2000,
   the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued
   a temporary restraining order against 24 year-old Refael Shaoulian
   ("Shaoulian") barring him from violations of the antifraud provisions
   of the federal securities laws. The Court, also on May 3^rd, issued an
   asset freeze against Shaoulin and his father, Samuel Shaoulian.

   In its original complaint filed on May 3^rd ("Original Complaint"),
   the Commission alleged that Shaoulian used the Internet to manipulate
   the price of a thinly traded stock by spreading false information to
   various Internet message boards, allowing him to reap more than
   $172,000 in trading profits. The Original Complaint, also named
   Shaoulian's father, Samuel Shaoulian, as a relief defendant based on
   his receipt of ill-gotten gains from the manipulation. Based upon
   evidence of additional manipulations by Shaoulian, on July 6, 2000,
   the Commission filed an amended Complaint ("Amended Complaint")
   charging that from April 1999 through July 1999, Shaoulian engaged in
   virtually identical Internet pump and dump schemes involving four
   additional stocks. With these four additional stock manipulations
   charged against Shaoulian, the Commission is seeking more than
   $388,000 in disgorgement from Shaoulian, his father and brother, as
   well as civil penalties against Shaoulian. The Amended Complaint also
   names Shaoulian's brother, Rabin Shaoulian of Beverly Hills, as a
   relief defendant because he received some of the ill-gotten gains from
   the manipulations.

   According to the Commission's Original Complaint, in January 2000,
   Shaoulian manipulated the common stock price of Universal Standard
   Healthcare, Inc. ("Universal"), a stock traded through the NASD's OTC
   Bulletin Board system, by posting numerous false messages on Internet
   message boards. The Complaint alleges that Shaoulian, a 24 year-old
   Beverly Hills resident and UCLA graduate, obtained more than $172,000
   in profits from his Internet pump and dump manipulation of Universal
   stock. Shaoulian did so by first buying a large block of Universal
   shares between January 24 and 26, 2000. According to the Complaint,
   during the weekend of January 29^th and 30^th, Shaoulian posted
   hundreds of messages, under multiple pseudonyms, to Internet financial
   message boards using publicly available computers located on the UCLA
   campus. These messages falsely stated that Universal was about to be
   purchased by another company and that Universal was profitable. In
SNIPPETS:
  • SEC v. REFAEL SHAOULIAN, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Civ.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on May 3, 2000, the U.S. District Court
  • In its original complaint filed on May 3^rd, the Commission alleged that Shaoulian used the
  • The Original Complaint, also named Shaoulian's father, Samuel Shaoulian, as a relief
  • Based upon evidence of additional manipulations by Shaoulian, on July 6, 2000, the Commission
  • With these four additional stock manipulations charged against Shaoulian, the Commission is
  • The Amended Complaint also names Shaoulian's brother, Rabin Shaoulian of Beverly Hills, as a
  • According to the Commission's Original Complaint, in January 2000, Shaoulian manipulated the
  • The Complaint alleges that Shaoulian, a 24 year-old Beverly Hills resident and UCLA graduate,
  • Shaoulian did so by first buying a large block of Universal shares between January 24 and 26,
  • Each of these stocks traded on the OTC Bulletin Board at the time of these manipulations.
  • In each instance, the Commission alleges that Shaoulian purchased a substantial block of
  • In a related action, the Commission today announced civil charges against two other
  •    |