![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES JUDGEMENT DEFENDANTS EXCHANGE COMMISSION COURT COMPLAINT PARTNERSHIPS SPECIALIZED MOBILE RADIO MOBILE RADIO DISGORGEMENT AMOUNT SALE SECURITIES ACT LITIGATION ALBANY JOHN FRAUD DISTRICT PENALTY FUNDS ALLEGES MATERIALS CONTROL LICENSES PROVISIONS VIOLATING SECURITIES REGISTRATION PROVISIONS ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS THEREUNDER |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16666 / August 29, 2000
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Internet Telecommunications
Albany System SMR, et al., Civil Action No. 1 99CV00539 (CKK) (D.D.C.)
COURT ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST JOHN C. TRIMPIN IN SPECIALIZED
MOBILE RADIO FRAUD
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on August 7,
2000, the Honorable Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, United States District
Court Judge for the District of Columbia, entered a Final Judgment of
Permanent Injunction and Other Relief as to John C. Trimpin. The final
judgment ordered Trimpin to pay $266,800 in disgorgement, $155,876 in
prejudgment interest and a $266,800 penalty. The judgment holds
Trimpin jointly and severally liable with other defendants previously
enjoined in the case and held liable for Trimpin's amounts of
disgorgement, interest and penalty. The Court found that the
disgorgement amount represented the amount of investor funds received
by Trimpin as a result of his unlawful conduct.
Trimpin admitted the allegations against him contained in the
Commission's complaint and consented to the entry of the Final
Judgment. According to the complaint, which was filed on March 2,
1999, Trimpin and other defendants engaged in fraud in connection with
the offer and sale to the public of securities designated as
partnership units in three general partnerships formed to develop
specialized mobile radio systems in Albany, New York, Reno, Nevada and
Anchorage, Alaska. The complaint alleges that Trimpin and other
defendants managed the fund raising and operations of the three
partnerships, and disseminated sales materials that contained material
misrepresentations and omissions. The complaint further alleges that
Trimpin and other defendants controlled the specialized mobile radio
licenses. These defendants failed to disclose this control and the
sale of the licenses to the partnerships at enormously excessive
prices. The Court enjoined Trimpin from violating the securities
registration provisions of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act
and the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
See also Litigation Release Nos. 16073 (March 2, 1999), 16592 (June
15, 2000) and 16660 (August 21, 2000).
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 08/30/2000
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |