U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 16676 / September 1, 2000
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian E. Pridgeon, Stephon A.
Carradine and Craig L. Smith, Civil Action No. 00 -009375 FMC (RZx)
(C.D. Cal.)
On September 1, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Commission") filed a complaint in the United States District Court
for the Central District of California alleging illegal insider
trading by Brian E. Pridgeon, a resident of San Jose, California and
former Intel Corporation marketing engineer, Stephon A. Carradine, his
cousin, and Craig L. Smith, Carradine's business partner. The
complaint alleges that Pridgeon misappropriated material nonpublic
information that he obtained from Intel regarding a transaction the
company was negotiating with Ancor Communications Inc., that he used
that information to trade in Ancor securities and that he tipped his
cousin, Stephon A. Carradine, who in turn tipped his business partner,
Craig L. Smith. Carradine and Smith are residents of Long Beach,
California, where they own a Century 21 - Coastline Realty office.
On the same day, the United States Attorney for the Central District
of California criminally charged Pridgeon, Carradine and Smith for
similar conduct alleged in the Commission's complaint.
The complaint alleges that in the summer and fall of 1999, within
months of first being employed at Intel, Pridgeon learned that the
company planned to enter into an agreement with Ancor in which the two
companies would collaborate to develop Intel's Spider chip for use in
Ancor's products and Intel would purchase $14 million in Ancor stock.
On December 7, 1999, Ancor and Intel announced their deal. The price
of Ancor stock rose $23 1/8 per share or 36.7% on news of the
announcement. The complaint further alleges that in the preceding four
weeks, Pridgeon purchased 5,600 shares of Ancor stock, ultimately
realizing illegal profits of over $137,000.
The complaint further alleges that Pridgeon tipped his cousin,
Carradine, who tipped his business partner, Smith. On December 2,
1999, Smith and Carradine purchased speculative call options in a
brokerage account they had opened in Smith's name the previous day.
Smith and Carradine realized an illegal profit of $95,000 from the
sale of those options.
The Commission charged the defendants with insider trading in
violation of the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The
complaint seeks an injunction against the defendants from future
SNIPPETS:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
On September 1, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in the United
The complaint alleges that Pridgeon misappropriated material nonpublic information that he
On the same day, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California criminally
The complaint alleges that in the summer and fall of 1999, within months of first being
The complaint further alleges that in the preceding four weeks, Pridgeon purchased 5,600
The Commission charged the defendants with insider trading in violation of the antifraud
The complaint seeks an injunction against the defendants from future antifraud violations,
|