![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INTERNET STOCK COMMISSION COMPLAINT ALLEGES PRICES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION WEBSITE PRE-TOUT PRICES INTERNET FRAUD DISGORGEMENT CHRISTOPHER STOCKPICKS1 KANSAS INTERNET MESSAGE BOARDS ACCORDING INJUNCTION REPRESENTING DECLINES MARKET SWEEP VIOLATIONS MANIPULATION WAIVE PAYMENT IMPOSE CIVIL PENALTY AVOID INTERNET PUMP-AND-DUMP STOCK MANIPULATION SCHEMES |
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16684/ September 6, 2000
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHRISTOPHER P. HASTINGS D/B/A/
STOCKPICKS1, Civ. No. 00-2397-GTV (USDC D. Kansas)
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a
federal court action against Kansas resident Christopher P. Hastings
("Hastings"), a school bus mechanic with no experience in the
securities industry. The Commission's complaint alleges that between
September 1999 and early January 2000, Hastings, using the name
"Stockpicks1," touted the stock of ten issuers through a free e-mail
newsletter, on an Internet website he maintained, and in messages he
posted on various Internet message boards. According to the complaint,
Hastings, who coordinated his stock recommendations with other touters
against whom the Commission obtained a preliminary injunction in April
2000, included data on his website indicating that a growing number of
his past stock picks (eventually reaching six) had achieved high
prices significantly exceeding the pre-tout prices listed,
representing an average increase of 410%. The complaint alleges that
this information was false and misleading because it did not disclose
that (1) the pre-tout and post tout prices represented intraday lows
and highs measured during arbitrarily varying periods; (2) on average,
the listed stocks declined to below their pre-tout prices within two
weeks; and (3) the prices of four additional stocks not listed on the
website experienced both short-term and long-term price declines.
Further, according to the complaint Hastings also misrepresented his
trading intentions in Internet message board postings and e-mail
messages. Moreover, the complaint alleges that in two instances,
Hastings sold his personal holdings of the touted stocks into the
resulting inflated market for total profits of approximately $70,309.
This action is part of the fourth nationwide Internet fraud sweep
conducted by the Commission since October 1998.
The Commission's complaint alleges that Hastings violated Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder. The Commission seeks disgorgement and a permanent
injunction. Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations,
Hastings has consented to the entry of an order that would enjoin him
from future violations of the foregoing provisions and disgorge
$70,309 plus prejudgment interest, but would waive payment of
disgorgement of all but $22,312 and would not impose a civil penalty
based on his demonstrated inability to pay.
For tips on how to avoid Internet "pump-and-dump" stock manipulation
schemes, visit . For more information about Internet fraud, visit . To
report suspicious activity involving possible Internet fraud, visit .
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |