LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MICHAEL A. FURR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16686, Defendant: Michael A. Furr, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16686, Furr, Commission, Stock, Securities, Internet, Reports, Compensation, Exchange Commission, Commission Alleges, Stock Manipulation Scheme, False Information, Stock Price Projections, Touting, Trading, Internet Fraud, Disclose, Commission Charges, Website, Research Reports, Nationwide, Radio, Broadcasts, False Revenue, Realized Proceeds, Sweep, Recommending, Exceeding, Seeking, Act, Obtained Trading Profits , ContentID: 120241426

Case Documents
1 2000-09-06 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104519
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
STOCK
SECURITIES
INTERNET
REPORTS
COMPENSATION
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
COMMISSION ALLEGES
STOCK MANIPULATION SCHEME
FALSE INFORMATION
STOCK PRICE PROJECTIONS
TOUTING
TRADING
INTERNET FRAUD
DISCLOSE
COMMISSION CHARGES
WEBSITE
RESEARCH REPORTS
NATIONWIDE
RADIO
BROADCASTS
FALSE REVENUE
REALIZED PROCEEDS
SWEEP
RECOMMENDING
EXCEEDING
SEEKING
ACT
OBTAINED TRADING PROFITS
   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Litigation Release No. 16686/September 6, 2000

   SEC v. , Civ. No. CV-00-09456 DT (Manx) (C.D. Cal.)

   Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued Michael A. Furr, a
   resident of Trabuco Canyon, California, and alleged that Furr
   orchestrated an Internet stock manipulation scheme as a paid promoter
   of penny stocks. The Commission charges that from January 1999 through
   January 2000, Furr disseminated false information regarding at least
   26 microcap companies through a free website, printed research
   reports, emails, and national radio show broadcasts. The Commission
   alleges that Furr made false revenue and stock price projections and
   misstated compensation he received for touting the companies. Further,
   the Commission alleges that Furr engaged in a fraudulent pattern of
   trading securities of the companies he touted through which he
   realized proceeds of at least $3.4 million. This action is part of the
   fourth nationwide Internet fraud sweep conducted by the Commission
   since October 1998.

   In the Complaint, the Commission charged that Furr drafted and
   published on his website, www.wallstreetresearch.net, research reports
   containing false information that he repeated in e-mail messages and
   radio broadcasts. The reports, recommending the purchase of the
   companies' stock, contained false revenue and stock price projections
   on at least four companies that exceeded the projections Furr received
   from those companies. The Commission asserted that, in one or more
   instances, Furr falsely characterized company assets, company
   officers, and business ventures. Additionally, Furr misstated the form
   and amount of compensation he received for touting the companies.
   Although Furr disclosed in his reports that he received $4,995 for
   writing and distributing the reports, the Commission claims Furr
   requested and received compensation in the form of stock worth
   substantially more than the $4,995 disclosed. Furr's
   misrepresentations, which appeared on the Internet, fueled a dramatic
   rise in both the price and the trading volume of most of the touted
   companies' common stock. Finally, shortly after touting the
   securities, Furr sold the entire position of stock he received as
   compensation and realized proceeds exceeding $3.4 million. Furr failed
   to disclose his practice of liquidating his position in the securities
   he recommended.

   The Commission is seeking an injunction against Furr to prevent
   violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
   Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and Section 17(b) of the Securities
   Act of 1933. The Commission is further seeking disgorgement of his
   wrongfully obtained trading profits and a civil money penalty.
SNIPPETS:
  • Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued Michael A. Furr, a resident of Trabuco
  • The Commission charges that from January 1999 through January 2000, Furr disseminated false
  • The Commission alleges that Furr made false revenue and stock price projections and misstated
  • the Commission alleges that Furr engaged in a fraudulent pattern of trading securities of the
  • This action is part of the fourth nationwide Internet fraud sweep conducted by the Commission
  • The reports, recommending the purchase of the companies' stock, contained false revenue and
  • Finally, shortly after touting the securities, Furr sold the entire position of stock he
  • Furr failed to disclose his practice of liquidating his position in the securities he
  • The Commission is seeking an injunction against Furr to prevent violations of Section 10of
  • The Commission is further seeking disgorgement of his wrongfully obtained trading profits and
  •    |