UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO.16688/ September 6, 2000
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LEE E. GAHR AND CHILL TECH
INDUSTRIES, INC., Civ. No. CV-S-00-1088-KJD-RJJ (USDC Nevada)
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a
federal court action against Chill Tech Industries, Inc. ("Chill
Tech"), a Nevada corporation, and its chief operating officer, Lee E.
Gahr ("Gahr"), a Vancouver, British Columbia resident. The
Commission's complaint alleges that between September 1998 and May
2000, Chill Tech and Gahr made numerous false and misleading
statements through the company's Internet website (www.chilltech.com),
various press releases, phony unsolicited faxes, and a magazine
article. According to the complaint, these statements concerned (1)
the "environmentally friendly" nature of, purported testing, and Chill
Tech's ability to manufacture, the "Arctic Can," purportedly a
self-cooling beverage can; (2) supposed sales presentations of the
Arctic Can to various well-known companies and governmental entities
and related revenue and earnings projections; (3) financial and stock
projections, and predictions of future listing of Chill Tech's common
stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. ("Nasdaq"); and (4) Chill
Tech's receipt of financing commitments and agreements to acquire
substantial assets. This information was false and misleading because
the Arctic Can contained Freon, an environmentally banned substance,
Chill Tech neither tested nor had the ability to manufacture the
Arctic Can; the company's sales "presentations" at best consisted of
unsolicited correspondence. The financial projections lacked a
reasonable basis because, among other reasons, they were predicated on
fictitious business relations and undermined by Chill Tech's
developmental stage status, lack of a viable product, and lack of
significant assets or revenues. Further, Gahr sold his personal
holdings of Chill Tech common stock into the resulting inflated market
for profits of at least $278,738. This action is part of the fourth
nationwide Internet fraud sweep conducted by the Commission since
October 1998.
The Commission's complaint charges that Gahr and Chill Tech violated
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder. The Commission further alleges that Gahr also violated
Sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2), 17(a)(3), 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities
Act of 1934. The Commission seeks disgorgement and civil penalties
against Gahr and permanent injunctions against both Gahr and Chill
Tech.
For tips on how to avoid Internet "pump-and-dump" stock manipulation
schemes, visit . For more information about Internet fraud, visit . To
SNIPPETS:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LEE E. GAHR AND CHILL TECH INDUSTRIES, INC., Civ.
No. CV-S-00-1088-KJD-RJJ (USDC Nevada)
The Commission's complaint alleges that between September 1998 and May 2000, Chill Tech and
According to the complaint, these statements concerned the "environmentally friendly" nature
c.; and Chill Tech's receipt of financing commitments and agreements to acquire substantial assets.
This information was false and misleading because the Arctic Can contained Freon, an
The financial projections lacked a reasonable basis because, among other reasons, they were
Further, Gahr sold his personal holdings of Chill Tech common stock into the resulting
This action is part of the fourth nationwide Internet fraud sweep conducted by the Commission
The Commission's complaint charges that Gahr and Chill Tech violated Section 10of the
For tips on how to avoid Internet "pump-and-dump" stock manipulation schemes,
To report suspicious activity involving possible Internet fraud,
For a description of other SEC enforcement actions involved in this Internet Market
|