LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v LEE E. GAHR and CHILL TECH INDUSTRIES, INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16688, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL COURT ACTION AGAINST CHILL TECH INDUSTRIES, INC. (CHILL, Defendant: Lee E. Gahr and Chill Tech Industries, Inc., Plaintiff: SEC, State: NV Nevada, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16688, Chill, Gahr, Chill Tech, Commission, Internet, Securities, Stock, Exchange Commission, Complaint, Projections, Financing, Market, Internet Fraud, Chill Tech Industries, Nevada, Alleges, Misleading, Ability, Sales, Revenue, Predictions, Common Stock, Substance, Assets, Reasons, Sweep, Act, Manipulation, Stock Manipulation Schemes, Report Suspicious Activity , ContentID: 120241424

Case Documents
1 2000-09-06 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104517
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
GAHR
CHILL TECH
COMMISSION
INTERNET
SECURITIES
STOCK
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
PROJECTIONS
FINANCING
MARKET
INTERNET FRAUD
CHILL TECH INDUSTRIES
NEVADA
ALLEGES
MISLEADING
ABILITY
SALES
REVENUE
PREDICTIONS
COMMON STOCK
SUBSTANCE
ASSETS
REASONS
SWEEP
ACT
MANIPULATION
STOCK MANIPULATION SCHEMES
REPORT SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY
   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   LITIGATION RELEASE NO.16688/ September 6, 2000

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LEE E. GAHR AND CHILL TECH
   INDUSTRIES, INC., Civ. No. CV-S-00-1088-KJD-RJJ (USDC Nevada)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a
   federal court action against Chill Tech Industries, Inc. ("Chill
   Tech"), a Nevada corporation, and its chief operating officer, Lee E.
   Gahr ("Gahr"), a Vancouver, British Columbia resident. The
   Commission's complaint alleges that between September 1998 and May
   2000, Chill Tech and Gahr made numerous false and misleading
   statements through the company's Internet website (www.chilltech.com),
   various press releases, phony unsolicited faxes, and a magazine
   article. According to the complaint, these statements concerned (1)
   the "environmentally friendly" nature of, purported testing, and Chill
   Tech's ability to manufacture, the "Arctic Can," purportedly a
   self-cooling beverage can; (2) supposed sales presentations of the
   Arctic Can to various well-known companies and governmental entities
   and related revenue and earnings projections; (3) financial and stock
   projections, and predictions of future listing of Chill Tech's common
   stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. ("Nasdaq"); and (4) Chill
   Tech's receipt of financing commitments and agreements to acquire
   substantial assets. This information was false and misleading because
   the Arctic Can contained Freon, an environmentally banned substance,
   Chill Tech neither tested nor had the ability to manufacture the
   Arctic Can; the company's sales "presentations" at best consisted of
   unsolicited correspondence. The financial projections lacked a
   reasonable basis because, among other reasons, they were predicated on
   fictitious business relations and undermined by Chill Tech's
   developmental stage status, lack of a viable product, and lack of
   significant assets or revenues. Further, Gahr sold his personal
   holdings of Chill Tech common stock into the resulting inflated market
   for profits of at least $278,738. This action is part of the fourth
   nationwide Internet fraud sweep conducted by the Commission since
   October 1998.

   The Commission's complaint charges that Gahr and Chill Tech violated
   Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
   thereunder. The Commission further alleges that Gahr also violated
   Sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2), 17(a)(3), 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities
   Act of 1934. The Commission seeks disgorgement and civil penalties
   against Gahr and permanent injunctions against both Gahr and Chill
   Tech.

   For tips on how to avoid Internet "pump-and-dump" stock manipulation
   schemes, visit . For more information about Internet fraud, visit . To
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LEE E. GAHR AND CHILL TECH INDUSTRIES, INC., Civ.
  • No. CV-S-00-1088-KJD-RJJ (USDC Nevada)
  • The Commission's complaint alleges that between September 1998 and May 2000, Chill Tech and
  • According to the complaint, these statements concerned the "environmentally friendly" nature c.; and Chill Tech's receipt of financing commitments and agreements to acquire substantial assets.
  • This information was false and misleading because the Arctic Can contained Freon, an
  • The financial projections lacked a reasonable basis because, among other reasons, they were
  • Further, Gahr sold his personal holdings of Chill Tech common stock into the resulting
  • This action is part of the fourth nationwide Internet fraud sweep conducted by the Commission
  • The Commission's complaint charges that Gahr and Chill Tech violated Section 10of the
  • For tips on how to avoid Internet "pump-and-dump" stock manipulation schemes,
  • To report suspicious activity involving possible Internet fraud,
  • For a description of other SEC enforcement actions involved in this Internet Market
  •    |