LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ROBERT H. SUTTON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16692, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, CIVIL ACTION NO. 99 C, Defendant: Robert H. Sutton, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16692, Sutton, Complaint, Securities, Exchange, Accounts, False Entries, District, Alleges, Earnings, Exchange Commission, Illinois, Entry, Violating, Exchange Act, Inventory, According, District Court, Northern District, Civil, Permanent, Judgement, Promulgated Thereunder, Controls, Books, Msc, Overstate, Fabrications, Ledger, Laminates, Composites , ContentID: 120241420

Case Documents
1 2000-09-07 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104513
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACCOUNTS
FALSE ENTRIES
DISTRICT
ALLEGES
EARNINGS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ILLINOIS
ENTRY
VIOLATING
EXCHANGE ACT
INVENTORY
ACCORDING
DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT
CIVIL
PERMANENT
JUDGEMENT
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
CONTROLS
BOOKS
MSC
OVERSTATE
FABRICATIONS
LEDGER
LAMINATES
COMPOSITES
   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
   Washington, D.C.

   LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16692 / SEPTEMBER 7, 2000

   ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT RELEASE NO. 1299

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. ROBERT H. SUTTON, U. S. District
   Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Civil Action No. 99 C
   6342 (N.D. Ill. September 27, 1999)

   The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on May 18,
   2000, the United States District Court for the Northern District of
   Illinois ordered the entry of a permanent injunction against Robert H.
   Sutton, thus settling the Commission's securities fraud action against
   Sutton.

   Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, Sutton
   consented to the entry of the judgment, which permanently enjoins him
   from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Sutton also
   consented to the entry of the judgment that Sutton violated Section
   13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13b2-1 promulgated thereunder by
   circumventing internal accounting controls and falsifying books,
   records and accounts. Sutton was ordered to pay a civil money penalty
   of $15,000.

   The Complaint alleged that Sutton, at the time a plant controller for
   a unit of Material Sciences Corporation ("MSC"), a Delaware
   corporation based in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, violated the federal
   securities laws by making false entries in the company's inventory and
   accounts payable records. The Complaint alleges that, as a result of
   Sutton's false entries, MSC overstated by 29% the net earnings
   disclosed in its financial statements for the fiscal year ended
   February 29, 1996. The Complaint also alleges that the false entries
   caused MSC to overstate the net earnings disclosed on MSC's Forms 10-Q
   during fiscal years 1996 and 1997 by amounts ranging between 6.27% and
   more than 300%.

   According to the Complaint, between March 1, 1995, and February 28,
   1997, Sutton intentionally fabricated the inventory work in process
   and entered these values into the general ledger of MSC's Laminates
   and Composites unit. According to the Complaint, Sutton's fabrications
   falsely increased MSC's earnings by artificially inflating the book
   value of the unit's inventory on hand and understating the unit's cost
   of sales.

   The Complaint also alleges that from March 1, 1996, to February 28,
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. ROBERT H. SUTTON, U. S. District Court for the Northern
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on May 18, 2000, the United
  • Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, Sutton consented to the entry of
  • Sutton also consented to the entry of the judgment that Sutton violated Section 13of the
  • Sutton was ordered to pay a civil money penalty of $15,000.
  • The Complaint alleged that Sutton, at the time a plant controller for a unit of Material
  • The Complaint alleges that, as a result of Sutton's false entries, MSC overstated by 29% the
  • The Complaint also alleges that the false entries caused MSC to overstate the net earnings
  • According to the Complaint, Sutton's fabrications falsely increased MSC's earnings by
  • The Complaint also alleges that from March 1, 1996, to February 28, 1997, Sutton
  •    |