LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v INTERNET SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16916, Defendant: Internet Solutions for Business, Inc., and Lawrence Shaw, Plaintiff: SEC, State: NV Nevada, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16916, Internet, Isfb, Promotion, Securities, Internet Fraud, Civil, Shaw, Fraudulent Promotional Activities, Website, Reports, Stock Price, Exchange Act, Internet Fraud Sweep, Commission, Nevada, Founder, Coventry, England, Cutting Edge, Blue Chip, Promotional Statements, Seeking, Violations, Provisions, Bockler, Owner, Stuart Bockler, Imcad, Anti-touting Provision , ContentID: 120241198

Case Documents
1 2001-02-28 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104291
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ISFB
PROMOTION
SECURITIES
BUSINESS
INTERNET FRAUD
CIVIL
SHAW
FRAUDULENT PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES
WEBSITE
REPORTS
STOCK PRICE
EXCHANGE ACT
INTERNET FRAUD SWEEP
COMMISSION
NEVADA
FOUNDER
COVENTRY
ENGLAND
CUTTING EDGE
BLUE CHIP
PROMOTIONAL STATEMENTS
SEEKING
VIOLATIONS
PROVISIONS
BOCKLER
OWNER
STUART BOCKLER
IMCAD
ANTI-TOUTING PROVISION
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Litigation Release No. 16916 / February 28, 2001

   , CIVIL ACTION NO. CDS-01-0225 (DH) (USDC/District of Nevada)

   On February 28, 2001, the Commission filed a civil lawsuit against
   Internet Solutions For Business, Inc. (ISFB) and its founder and CEO,
   Lawrence Shaw. The SEC's action pertains to the fraudulent promotional
   activities by ISFB, a publicly traded Internet company located in
   Coventry, England. From March 1999 until at least October 2000, ISFB
   held itself out as a sophisticated, high-tech Internet company with
   cutting edge new products and profitable business relationships with
   recognizable "blue chip" companies. ISFB hyped these products and
   relationships on its website, in press releases and through reports it
   paid to have published. All the promotional statements contained on
   ISFB's website and in its releases, and which were repeated in the
   published reports, were authorized by Shaw.

   The defendants are
     * , a Nevada corporation headquartered in Coventry, England, is
       engaged in various Internet-related businesses; and
     * , age 32, is a U.K. resident and the founder, president, largest
       shareholder and CEO of ISFB.

   The SEC alleges that ISFB's promotional statements were false and
   misleading. The company's supposed cutting edge new products never
   reached the point of commercial viability. For example, a "$4.1
   billion website audit service," repeatedly hyped by the company, was
   nothing more than a concept which was never developed. Similarly,
   announcements of business relationships with "blue chip" companies
   were either outright lies or gross exaggerations of the true scope of
   work or ongoing status of the relationship. Further, ISFB's stock
   price projections (300% increase over the mid-term) were without any
   reasonable basis and were made at a time during which the company was
   in a precarious financial position. Notwithstanding dire financial
   problems, ISFB's stock price and trading volume substantially
   increased contemporaneously with the company's fraudulent promotional
   activities.

   The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions against future violations of
   the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically
   Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
   thereunder. The SEC is further seeking a civil monetary penalty
   against Shaw.

   In a related action, the SEC instituted and simultaneously settled
   cease-and-desist proceedings against a New Jersey corporation,
SNIPPETS:
  • CIVIL ACTION NO. CDS-01-0225 (USDC/District of Nevada)
  • On February 28, 2001, the Commission filed a civil lawsuit against Internet Solutions For
  • The SEC's action pertains to the fraudulent promotional activities by ISFB, a publicly traded
  • From March 1999 until at least October 2000, ISFB held itself out as a sophisticated,
  • All the promotional statements contained on ISFB's website and in its releases, and which
  • ISFB's stock price projections were without any reasonable basis and were made at a time
  • ISFB's stock price and trading volume substantially increased contemporaneously with the
  • The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions against future violations of the antifraud
  • In a related action, the SEC instituted and simultaneously settled cease-and-desist
  • The SEC found in that proceeding that Imcad and Bockler violated the anti-touting provision
  • This action is brought as part of the SEC's Fifth Internet Fraud Sweep.
  • For a description of other SEC enforcement actions involved in this Internet Fraud Sweep,
  •    |