LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MONTEDISON, S.P.A Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16948, CourtName: THROUGH EARLY 1993, WAS ORDERED BY THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE, Defendant: Montedison, S.p.A., Plaintiff: SEC, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16948, Montedison, Commission, Exchange, Complaint, Securities, Compart, Italian, Senior Management, Reports, Accounting, Auditing Enforcement, Civil, Fraudulent, District, Violating, Settlement, Stock Exchange, Exchange Act, Energy, Engineering Sectors, American Depositary Receipts, York Stock Exchange, File Reports, Commission Pursuant, Annual Reports, Adrs, Sale, Thereunder , ContentID: 120241166

Case Documents
1 2001-03-30 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104259
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE
COMPLAINT
SECURITIES
COMPART
ITALIAN
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
REPORTS
LITIGATION
ACCOUNTING
AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL
FRAUDULENT
DISTRICT
VIOLATING
SETTLEMENT
STOCK EXCHANGE
EXCHANGE ACT
ENERGY
ENGINEERING SECTORS
AMERICAN DEPOSITARY RECEIPTS
YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
FILE REPORTS
COMMISSION PURSUANT
ANNUAL REPORTS
ADRS
SALE
DEFENDANT
THEREUNDER
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 16948 / March 30, 2001

   Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1380 / March 30, 2001

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MONTEDISON, S.p.A., Civil Action
   No. 1 96CV02631 (RWR) (D. D.C.)

   Montedison, S.p.A., an Italian company whose senior management at the
   time fraudulently overstated company income by at least $398 million
   through early 1993, was ordered by the U.S. District Court for the
   District of Columbia to pay a civil penalty of $300,000 for violating
   the antifraud, financial reporting and books and records provisions of
   the U.S. federal securities laws. The order was the result of a
   settlement between the Commission and Montedison in which Montedison
   neither admitted nor denied liability for the allegations in the
   complaint. The Commission filed the complaint in 1996.

   The Commission complaint alleged that Montedison disguised hundreds of
   millions of dollars in payments that, among other things, were used to
   bribe politicians in Italy and other persons. The fraudulent conduct
   was disclosed only after new management was appointed when Montedison
   disclosed it was unable to service its bank debt. Virtually all of the
   former senior management at Montedison responsible for the fraud were
   convicted by Italian criminal authorities and were sued by the
   company.

   Montedison, which was an Italian corporation with headquarters in
   Milan, had interests in the agro-industry, chemicals, energy and
   engineering sectors. Until late 2000, American Depositary Receipts
   ("ADRs") were listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Montedison was
   required to file reports with the Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
   of the Exchange Act, including annual reports on Form 20-F.

   Montedison was acquired by Compart, S.p.A., in late 2000 and its ADRs
   were delisted. Compart then changed its name to Montedison. No
   securities of Compart are listed for sale by U.S. stock exchanges.
   Compart, which agreed to the settlement on behalf of the former
   Montedison, was not a defendant in the Commission's complaint.

   In its complaint, the Commission alleged that Montedison violated
   Exchange Act sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) and
   Rules 10b-5, 12b-20 and 13a-1 thereunder. See also Litigation Release
   No. 15164, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 859 (Nov.
   21, 1996).
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Montedison, S.p.A., an Italian company whose senior management at the time fraudulently
  • The order was the result of a settlement between the Commission and Montedison in which
  • The fraudulent conduct was disclosed only after new management was appointed when Montedison
  • Virtually all of the former senior management at Montedison responsible for the fraud were
  • Montedison, which was an Italian corporation with headquarters in Milan, had interests in the
  • American Depositary Receipts were listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Montedison was required to file reports with the Commission pursuant to Section 13of the
  • Montedison was acquired by Compart, S.p.A., in late 2000 and its ADRs were delisted.
  • No securities of Compart are listed for sale by U.S. stock exchanges.
  • Compart, which agreed to the settlement on behalf of the former Montedison, was not a
  • In its complaint, the Commission alleged that Montedison violated Exchange Act sections 10,
  • See also Litigation Release No. 15164, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 859.
  •    |