LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v J. VAN OLIVER Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-16971, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL ACTION NO.1, Defendant: J. Van Oliver, Plaintiff: SEC, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-16971, Van Oliver, Exchange, Commission, Merger, District, Securities, United States District, States District Court, Columbia, Civil, Texas Utilities, Enserch, Shares, Profits, Exchange Act, Pay, Allegations, Complaint, Entry, Injunction Prohibiting Future, Prohibiting Future Violations, Thereunder, Judgement, Disgorge Profits, Pay Prejudgment, Civil Penalty Pursuant, Assistance, York Stock Exchange, Matter , ContentID: 120241143

Case Documents
1 2001-04-19 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 104236
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
MERGER
DISTRICT
SECURITIES
LITIGATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
STATES DISTRICT COURT
COLUMBIA
CIVIL
TEXAS UTILITIES
ENSERCH
SHARES
PROFITS
EXCHANGE ACT
PAY
ALLEGATIONS
COMPLAINT
ENTRY
INJUNCTION PROHIBITING FUTURE
PROHIBITING FUTURE VIOLATIONS
THEREUNDER
JUDGEMENT
DISGORGE PROFITS
PAY PREJUDGMENT
CIVIL PENALTY PURSUANT
ASSISTANCE
YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
MATTER
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Litigation Release No. 16971 /April 19, 2001

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. J. VAN OLIVER, United States
   District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No.1
   01CV00859

   The Commission today filed a settled insider trading action in the
   United States District Court for the District of Columbia against J.
   Van Oliver. The Commission alleged that Oliver learned of the merger
   between Texas Utilities and Enserch Corp., prior to the April 15, 1996
   announcement of the merger, from his brother, an attorney at the law
   firm that represented Texas Utilities in the merger negotiations. J.
   Van Oliver purchased 3,050 shares of Enserch after receiving this
   information about the merger, and profited from the increase in the
   price of these shares after the announcement of the merger.

   J. Van Oliver consented, without admitting or denying the allegations
   of the Complaint, to the entry of an injunction prohibiting future
   violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
   Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The judgment also requires Oliver to disgorge
   profits of $11,369.17, pay prejudgment interest of $5,451.76, and pay
   a civil penalty pursuant to Section 21A of the Exchange Act of
   $11,369.17. See also Litigation Release No. 16949.

   The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the New York Stock
   Exchange in this matter.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 04/20/2001
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. J. VAN OLIVER, United States District Court for the
  • The Commission today filed a settled insider trading action in the United States District
  • The Commission alleged that Oliver learned of the merger between Texas Utilities and Enserch
  • J. Van Oliver purchased 3,050 shares of Enserch after receiving this information about the
  • J. Van Oliver consented, without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint, to
  • The judgment also requires Oliver to disgorge profits of $11,369.17, pay prejudgment interest
  • See also Litigation Release No. 16949.
  • The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the New York Stock Exchange in this matter.
  •    |