LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

HARBOR FINANCE PARTNERS v SUGARMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 14,834, CourtName: LETTER REQUESTING THAT THE COURT DECIDE PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO, Plaintiff: HARBOR FINANCE PARTNERS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00014834, Chancery, Motion, Standing, Merger, Del, Strine, Shareholder, Honorable Leo, Vice Chancellor, Dismiss, Register, Enclosure, Supr, Reason, Checkers, Esquire, Stockholder, Compel, Moot, Uncontested Fact, Delaware Law, Honor, Peter, Ladig, Carmella, Keener , ContentID: 120241076

Case Documents
1 1999-08-12 LETTER TO V.C. STRINE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103664
2 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . LETTER TO V.C. STRINE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CHANCERY
MOTION
STANDING
MERGER
DEL
STRINE
DEFENDANTS
SHAREHOLDER
HONORABLE LEO
VICE CHANCELLOR
COURT
DISMISS
REGISTER
ENCLOSURE
SUPR
REASON
CHECKERS
ESQUIRE
STOCKHOLDER
COMPEL
MOOT
UNCONTESTED FACT
DELAWARE LAW
HONOR
COUNSEL
PETER
LADIG
CARMELLA
KEENER
                  M O R R is, N ICHOLS,   ARSH~   &  T U N N E L L
                               I zo I N ORTH  M ARKET  S TREET
                                          P.O.  Box  1347
                       W I L M I N G T O N , D E L A W A R E   1 9 8 9 9 - l   3 4 7

                                    T E L E P H O N E   I3021  658-9200

                                     T E L E C O P Y   (302)  6 5 8 - 3 9 8 9








                                     August 12, 1999



BY HAND

The Honorable Leo E. Strine, Jr.
Vice Chancellor
Court of Chancery
Daniel L. Herrmann Courthouse
1020 N. King Street
Wilmington, DE      19801

           Re:     Harbor Finance Partners v. Sugarman, et al.,
                   Civil Action No. 14834

Dear Vice Chancellor Strine:

           We have received plaintiff's counsel's August 4, 1999
letter requesting that the Court decide plaintiff's motion to
compel.      Plaintiff's             motion               need             not be           decided
plaintiff lacks standing to maintain this derivative action and,
accordingly, this action should be dismissed.                                                A
of defendants' motion to dismiss, filed today with the Register
in Chancery, is enclosed.

           Plaintiff purports to bring this action derivatively
on behalf of Rally's Hamburgers,                                        Inc.           
settled    Delaware      law,           "[t]o have standing to maintain a
shareholder derivative suit, a plaintiff must . . . remain a
shareholder throughout the litigation."                                          Kramer v. Western
Indus., Inc., Del. Supr., 546 A.2d 348, 354 (1988); see also 8
Del. C. tj 327; Ct. Ch. R. 23.1.                                        As a consequence of this
SNIPPETS:
  • The Honorable Leo E. Strine,
  • Vice Chancellor Court of Chancery
  • Dear Vice Chancellor Strine:
  • We have received plaintiff's counsel's August 4, 1999 letter requesting that the Court decide
  • plaintiff lacks standing to maintain this derivative action and,
  • of defendants' motion to dismiss, filed today with the Register in Chancery, is enclosed.
  • Plaintiff purports to bring this action derivatively
  • shareholder derivative suit, a plaintiff must.
  • Supr., 546 A.2d 348, 354;
  • Merritt v. Colonial Foods, Inc., Del.
  • Supr., 477 A.2d 1040, 1049 ("A plaintiff who ceases to be a shareholder whether by reason of
  • plaintiff is no longer a stockholder in Rally's and lacks
  • should be dismissed and plaintiff's motion to compel is moot.
  • Given the uncontested fact of the merger of Rally's into Checkers and the clear impact under
  • event Your Honor has any questions regarding defendants' motion, counsel will, of course,
  • Enclosure
  • Register in Chancery Peter B. Ladig, Esquire Carmella P. Keener, Esquire
  •    |