LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

NOERR v GREENWOOD Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 14,320, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: NOERR, State: VA Virginia, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00014320, Specialty, Plan, Stock, Class Action, Proxy Statement, Del, Motion, Certification, Second Amended Complaint, Stockholders, Common, Directors, Delaware, Exercise Price, Tri-star, Dismiss, Common Stock, Fair Market, Plans, Long-term Incentive Plan, Paragraph, Exercise, James Knoll, Management, Allegations, Defendants Admit, Complaint, Shareholders, Deny, Noerr, Derivative Claim, Merger, Richard Huber, Chancery Rule, Reasons, Bankruptcy, Law Offices, Terrence Buehler, Shares , ContentID: 120241053

Case Documents
1 2002-11-22 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131718
17 pages
PDF
2 2001-06-15 ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115277
10 pages
PDF
3 2001-06-13 THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115278
14 pages
PDF
4 2001-06-06 THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115279
14 pages
PDF
5 2001-04-10 PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115575
19 pages
PDF
6 2001-01-08 DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103417
16 pages
PDF
7 2000-12-12 PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103418
25 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 7 documents , 115 pages
Price: $ 49.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
CERTIFICATION
COURT
SPECIALTY
CLASS ACTION
DIRECTORS
NOERR
STOCKHOLDERS
REASONS
MOTION
ATTORNEYS
DELAWARE
CHANCERY
DISCLOSURE CLAIM
CLASS DEFINITION
EXERCISE PRICE
PROXY STATEMENT
SPECIALTY COMMON
PROPOSED CLASS
DEFENDANTS ARGUE
COMPLAINT
SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT COMPANIES
TERRANCE BUEHLER
WILMINGTON
ROSENTHAL MONHAIT GROSS
TRANSFEREES
SUCCESSORS
ADJUDICATIONS
  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

VIRGINIA A.  NOERR,                  ))
            Plaintiff,               1            C.A. No. 14320-NC
                                     1
            V.                       )
                                     )
DANIEL GREENWOOD, THOMAS  )
ANDERSON, RICHARD HUBER,             )
CHARLES HUTCHINSON,                  1
RICHARD RENT, BARRY                  )
MACLEAN,  and GERTA KNOLL,           )
EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF )
JAMES KNOLL,                         )1
            Defendants.              ))
                                 OPINION

                   Date Submitted: September  11,2002
                    Date Decided: November  22,2002

Norman M. Monhait, Esquire of ROSENTHAL MONHAIT GROSS  &
GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; and Terrance  Buehler, Janet L.
Reed, and Robert E. Williams, Esquires of BUEHLER REED  &
WILLIAMS, Chicago, Illinois; Attorneys for the Plaintiff.

Martin P.  Tully and S. Mark Hurd, Esquires of MORRIS, NICHOLS,
ARSHT & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware; and Christopher Q. King,
Esquire of SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL, Chicago, Illinois;
Attorneys for the Defendants.


JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR


        Pending is a motion for class action certification in this action brought

by Virginia A.  Noerr  ("the plaintiff' or  "Noerr")  against the former

members of the board of directors of Specialty Equipment Companies

("Specialty" or "the company"). For the reasons discussed below, the

plaintiffs class certification motion will be granted, although the class that

is certified will be narrower than the proposed class as defined by the

plaintiff.
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Norman M. Monhait, Esquire of ROSENTHAL MONHAIT GROSS & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware;
  • Pending is a motion for class action certification in this action brought
  • by Virginia A. Noerr ("the plaintiff' or "Noerr") against the former
  • members of the board of directors of Specialty Equipment Companies
  • For the reasons discussed below,
  • is certified will be narrower than the proposed class as defined by the
  • proposed class of Specialty common stockholders.'
  • Specialty common stock on April 2, 1993, and their successors in interest,
  • In'her Third and Supplemental complaint,
  • 1993 the defendant directors misled the stockholders by disseminating a
  • * The defendants and their affiliates are excluded from the class.
  • The exercise price disclosed in the proxy statement was $1 per share.
  • a class must satisfy both prongs of Court of Chancery
  • fairly and adequately represent the interests of other class members.
  • defendants also contend the class definition is too vague to permit
  • improper because there is no risk of inconsistent adjudications
  • In their correspondence of August 15,2002, the defendants argue that the Court should not
  • "successors in interest and transferees and assigns."
  • standing to assert the disclosure claim, because by its very nature, that claim

  • 2 . ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARAGRAPH
    ALLEGATIONS
    DEFENDANTS ADMIT
    DENY
    SPECIALTY
    PLAINTIFF
    REPORTS
    PLAN
    PROXY STATEMENT
    SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
    STOCK
    SPEAK
    ALLEGATION INCONSISTENT
    CHARACTERIZATION THEREOF
    KNOLL
    EXECUTOR
    INCONSISTENT THEREWITH
    ESTATE
    SHARES
    SPECIALTY COMMON STOCK
    THOMAS ANDERSON
    STOCKHOLDERS
    REQUIRING
    REPRESENTATIVES
    JAMES KNOLL
    PLAINTIFF PURPORTS
    RELIEF
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    VALUATIONS
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    VIRGINIA A.  NOERR,
    
                            Plaintiff,
    
    
              V.
    
    DANIEL GREENWOOD, THOMAS                                       Civil Action No. 14320 NC
    ANDERSON, CHARLES HUTCHINSON,
    RICHARD KENT, BARRY MACLEAN, and
    GERTA KNOLL, EXECUTOR OF THE
    ESTATE OF JAMES KNOLL,
    
                            Defendants.                    >
    
    
                                          ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S
                       THIRD  AMENDED AND, SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
    
              Defendants Daniel Greenwood, Charles Hutchinson, Richard Kent, Barry  MacLean,
    
    Gerta Knoll, as executor of the estate of James Knoll, and the Estate of Thomas Anderson
    
    (collectively "Defendants"), by their attorneys, hereby respond to the numbered paragraphs of
    
    the Plaintiffs Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint as follows.
    
                                           NATURE OF THE CASE
    
              1.     Defendants admit that plaintiff purports to bring this action on behalf of a
    
    class, and that plaintiff purports to seek the relief set forth in Paragraph No. 1. Defendants deny
    
    that the Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint states a claim as a matter of law, deny that
    
    this case can be maintained as a class  acti'on,  and deny the remaining allegations of Paragraph
    
    No. 1.
    
                                               DIE PARTIES
    
              2.     Defendants are without information or knowledge sufficient to form a btelief  as to
    
    the truth of the allegations of Paragraph No 2.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • GERTA KNOLL, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES KNOLL,
  • Gerta Knoll, as executor of the estate of James Knoll, and the Estate of Thomas Anderson
  • the Plaintiffs Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint as follows.
  • Defendants admit that plaintiff purports to bring this action on behalf of a putative
  • and that plaintiff purports to seek the relief set forth in Paragraph No. 1.
  • Defendants deny
  • the truth of the allegations of Paragraph No 2.
  • Defendants deny that Specialty Equipment Companies,
  • information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of Paragraph No. S.
  • many shares of Specialty common stock plaintiff received.
  • Defendants admit that Specialty hired the valuation consulting firm of Lloyd-Thomas Coates &
  • No. 9 inconsistent therewith and any characterization thereof,
  • Proxy Statement was to obtain stockholder approval for the Plans.
  • valuations of Specialty's business as of March,
  • The valuations speak for themselves as to
  • Reorganization Plan.
  • deny any allegation inconsistent therewith,
  • Defendants admit that a letter dated May 7, 1993 was addressed to Specialty stockholders.
  • Defendants admit that options to purchase 3,265,OOO shares of Specialty stock,
  • Defendants admit that Specialty common stock was listed on the N,4SDAQ
  • To the extent facts requiring a response are pleaded,
  • The Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint fails to state a claim upon wh.ch relief
  • Estate of Thomas Anderson (including its executors, administrators and representatives) are

  • 3 . THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    SPECIALTY
    STOCK
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    PROXY STATEMENT
    SHARES
    MEMBERS
    INCENTIVE PLAN
    EXERCISE
    MARKET
    BANKRUPTCY
    COURT
    EXECUTOR
    APPROVE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MANAGEMENT
    MERGER
    EXERCISE PRICE
    FAIR MARKET
    KNOLL
    DIRECTORS
    LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
    SENIOR MANAGEMENT
    MISLEADING
    PURSUANT
    PROJECTIONS
    VOTE
    PRIOR
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    VIRGINIA A .  NOERR,
    
           Plaintiff,
                                                         i
           V.                                            ) Civil Action No. 14320 NC
    
    DANIEL GREENWOOD, THOMAS
    ANDERSON, CHARLES HUTCHINSON,
    RICHARD KENT, BARRY  MACLEAN,
    and GERTA KNOLL, EXECUTOR OF THE
    ESTATE OF JAMES KNOLL,
    
           Defendants.
    
                         THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
    
           Plaintiff, by her attorneys, for her Third Amended Complaint against defendants,
    
    alleges the following:
    
                                       NATURE OF THE CASE
    
           1.       This class action arises from self-dealing and breaches of fiduciary duty by the
    
    defendant members of the board of directors (the "Board") of Specialty Equipment
    
    Companies, Inc. ("Specialty" or the "Company") in connection with: (1) their obtaining
    
    shareholder approval of the Company's Executive Long-Term  Incemive Plan and the  Non-
    
    Management Directors Long-Term Incentive Plan (collectively, the "Plans") via a false and
    
    misleading proxy statement; and (2  ) their awarding of stock options to themselves and senior
    
    management under the Plans and their subsequent exercise of such options. Plaintiff brings
    
    this action to recover the losses she and other former Specialty shareholders sustained as a
    
    result of defendants' breaches of fiduciary duty.
    
    
    
                                              ?`HE PARTIES
    
           2.     Plaintiff Virginia A.  Noerr, at all times relevant hereto owned shares of
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • and GERTA KNOLL, EXECUTOR OF THE
  • ESTATE OF JAMES KNOLL,
  • Plaintiff, by her attorneys, for her Third Amended Complaint against defendants,
  • defendant members of the board of directors of Specialty Equipment
  • Inc. ("Specialty" or the "Company") in connection with:
  • shareholder approval of the Company's Executive Long-Term Incemive Plan and the
  • misleading proxy statement; and their awarding of stock options to themselves and senior
  • management under the Plans and their subsequent exercise of such options.
  • Specialty common stock.
  • Corporation acquired Specialty by merger for $30.50 per share in cash.
  • $200,000 in the open market.
  • bankruptcy court protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
  • pro rata distribution of 15 million shares of newly issued common stock in the reorganized
  • Pursuant to the terms of the Bankruptcy Plan,
  • cc> Pursuant to the terms of the Bankruptcy Plan, 905,`912 shares of restricted Specialty
  • themselves secretly at the expense of Splecialty and its stockholders by means of the Plans.
  • the defendants caused a proxy stai:ement (the "Proxy Statement") to be sent to Specialty
  • Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan, although the Board anticipated that awards would be
  • granted to "twenty to fifty employees, including senior management";
  • (4 The exercise price of the stock options available under the Plans "cannot
  • The Board believed that the fair market value of the Company's stock
  • bankruptcy proceedings that included projections of the Company's future financial.
  • period in the prior year and 15% ahead of plan.
  • Company's annual meeting to approve the Plans, the members of the:
  • dI[MPAIRMENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN INFORm) VOTE

  • 4 . THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    SPECIALTY
    STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    PROXY STATEMENT
    MEMBERS
    LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
    COURT
    MANAGEMENT
    EXERCISE
    JAMES KNOLL
    COMMON STOCK
    NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS
    SENIOR
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    MISLEADING PROXY STATEMENT
    CHARLES HUTCHINSON
    BARRY MACLEAN
    SHAREHOLDER
    BANKRUPTCY
    FAIR MARKET
    THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    EXERCISE PRICE
    GERTA KNOLL
    SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT
    CONNECTION
    INFORMED VOTE
    PROJECTIONS
    
                                             ORIGINAL
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR  NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                         I
    
    VIRGINIA A .  NOERR,
    
           Plaintiff,
                                                         1
           V.                                            ) Civil Action No. 14320 -NC
    
    DANIEL GREENWOOD, THOMAS                             i
    ANDERSON, RICHARD HUBER,                             )                                  .  .-
    CHARLES HUTCHINSON, RICHARD KENT, )
    BARRY  MACLEAN, and GERTA KNOLL,
    EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF                            1                                   ,
    JAMES KNOLL,
                                                         ;
           Defendants.                                   )
    
                    THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
    
           Plaintiff, by her attorneys, for her Third Amended Complaint against defendants,
    
    alleges the following:
    
                                       NATURE OF THE CASE
    
           1.       This class action arises from self-dealing and breaches of fiduciary duty by the
    
    defendant members of the board of directors (the "Board") of Specialty Equipment
    
    Companies, Inc. ("Specialty" or the "Company") in connection with: (1) their obtaining
    
    shareholder approval of the Company's Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan and the  Non-
    
    Management Directors Long-Term Incentive Plan (collectively, the "Plans") via a false and
    
    misleading proxy statement; and (2  ) their awarding of stock options to themselves and senior
    
    management under the Plans and their subsequent exercise of such options. Plaintiff brings
    
    this action to recover the losses she and other former Specialty shareholders sustained as a
    
    result of defendants' breaches of fiduciary duty,
    
    
    
                                              THE PARTIES
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • CHARLES HUTCHINSON, RICHARD KENT,)
  • BARRY MACLEAN, and GERTA KNOLL,
  • Plaintiff, by her attorneys, for her Third Amended Complaint against defendants,
  • This class action arises from self-dealing and breaches of fiduciary duty by the
  • defendant members of the board of directors of Specialty Equipment
  • Inc. ("Specialty" or the "Company") in connection with:
  • shareholder approval of the Company's Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan and the
  • and their awarding of stock options to themselves and senior
  • management under the Plans and their subsequent exercise of such options.
  • Specialty common stock.
  • (d Gerta M. Knoll is the Executor of the Estate of James Knoll.
  • bankruptcy court protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
  • themselves secretly at the expense of Specialty and its stockholders by means of the Plans.
  • the defendants caused a proxy statement to be sent to Specialty
  • (4 The exercise price of the stock options available under the Plans "cannot
  • be less than" the fair market value of the stock on the date that the options were granted;
  • * The Proxy Statement represented that the Board had approved the Non-Management Directors
  • These projections for fiscal year 1994 were
  • at the time of the Proxy Statement and shareholder vote gave them every reason for optimism
  • CLASS CLAIM BASED UPON MISLEADING PROXY STATEMENT
  • Plaintiff and the Class by impairing their right to an informed vote on the Plans,

  • 5 . PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    SPECIALTY
    DEL
    MOTION
    TRI-STAR
    DISMISS
    COURT
    COMPLAINT
    LITIGATION
    PROXY STATEMENT
    STOCK
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PLANS
    VOTING RIGHTS
    DISCLOSURE
    DERIVATIVE CLAIMS
    JOINT MOTION
    TERRENCE BUEHLER
    LAW OFFICES
    AVACUS PARTNERS
    CABLE INCOME PARTNERS
    COMMON STOCK
    EXERCISE PRICE
    DELAWARE SUPREME COURT
    FAIR MARKET
    COCA-COLA
    MATERIALS
    MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    
                                             ORIGINAL
                                                                                                       
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                   
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ----------------~---------------------------------,~-----"----~x
    
    VIRGINIA A.  NOERR,
    
             Plaintiff,
    
             V.
    
    DANIEL GREENWOOD, THOMAS
    ANDERSON,              RICHARD
                                    HUBER,
    CHARLES HUTCHINSON, RICHARD KENT,
    BARRY  MACLEAN,  GERTA KNOLL,
    EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
    JAMES KNOLL, and SPECIALTY
    EQUIPMENT COMPANIES, INC.,
    
             Defendants.
    ------------------------------------------"---------~---------x
    
           PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
             JOINT  MOTION  TO DISMISS THE SECOND  AMENDED   CQMPLAINT
    
                                                                       ROSENTHAL  MONH.4IT GROSS
                                                                       6~ GODDESS, P.A.
                                                                       N'orman   M. Monhait
                                                                       Suite  1401, Mellon Bank Center
                                                                       P.O. Box  1070
                                                                       Wilmington, DE 19899-1070
                                                                       (302) 656-4433
                                                                       Attorneys  for Plaintiff
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    Terrence Buehler
    Janet L. Reed
    LAW OFFICES OF TERRENCE BIJEHLER
    Suite 1150
    120 North LaSalle Street
    Chicago, IL 60602
    
    
    April 10, 2001
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • JAMES KNOLL, and SPECIALTY
  • PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND
  • Terrence Buehler
  • LAW OFFICES OF TERRENCE BIJEHLER
  • Avacus Partners, L.P. v. Brian, Del.
  • In Re Cencom Cable Income Partners LP Litigation., Del.
  • In Re Tri-Star P_ictures, Inc. Litigation, Del.
  • Plaintiff Virginia Noerr commenced this action in May 1995 to seek relief concerning
  • As the Court may recall from its consideration of defendants' initial motion to dismiss,
  • directors instituted a scheme to enrich themselves through options to purchase Specialty stock
  • Specialty's directors at the time, promulgated two incentive plans
  • defendants sent Specialty's shareholders, however, was materially inaccurate and omitted
  • material information in a number of respects including: a representation that the fair market
  • which would form the floor for the exercise price of the options on
  • and on behalf of a class of Specialty shareholders, that the proxy statement by which
  • Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint.
  • three claimed disclosure violations, but granted plaintiff leave to replead one of those.
  • Second Complaint plainly pleads a claim of interference with the voting rights of Specialty
  • In April 1993, Specialty sent its stockholders of record as of April 13, 1993 a proxy
  • Specialty's common stock was not more than $1.00 per share,
  • the complaint supported both individual and derivative claims,
  • division of Coca-Cola (which ultimately resulted in Coca-Cola obtaining 80% ownership of
  • the Delaware Supreme Court in Tri-Sta.1 II confirmed two non-derivative
  • Id.5 The Court also found that plaintiffs had suffered individual harm in the form of "voting
  • & The Court distinguished that harm from plaintiffs' other voting rights claims, explaining

  • 6 . DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    MOTION
    PLAN
    DERIVATIVE CLAIM
    PLAINTIFF
    SPECIALTY
    DEL
    STOCK
    MERGER
    DISMISS
    DELAWARE
    RICHARD HUBER
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CLASS CLAIM
    SHAREHOLDERS
    EXERCISE PRICE
    FAIR MARKET
    PROXY STATEMENT
    EMPLOYEE PLAN
    WILMINGTON
    CONTINUOUS OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    CERTIFICATION
    DELAWARE AVENUE
    DIRECTORS
    OUTSTANDING SHARES
    BANKRUPTCY COURT
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    
                THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DEILAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VIRGINIA A. NOERR,
    
    
                                 Plaintiff,             C.A. No. 14320
                                                  i
                  V.
                                                  t
    
    DANIEL GREENWOOD, THOMAS                      ;
    ANDERSON, RICHARD  HUBER,
    CHARLES HUTCHINSON, RICHARD KENT,             ;                                 i.  .
    BARRY MACLEAN, GERTA KNOLL,                                             cc>:
                                                                            :
    EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF                     i                                 `
    JAMES KNOLL, AND SPECIALTY                                                                   `/j
                                                                                         c>      "
    EQUIPMENT COMPANIES, INC.,                    ;
                                 Defendants.                                        I  :
                                                                                         li
    
    
                                                                                         `  ?
                        DEFENDANTS'  OPENING-EERIEF  IN SUPPORT OF THEIR.
              JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS TI-rE;, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
    
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                         MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &
                                                        TUNNELL
    Christopher Q. King                                 Martin P. Tully
    SONNENSCHEIN NATH  & ROSENTHAL                      S. Mark Hurd
    8000 Sears Tower                                    1201 N. Market Street
    Chicago, IL 60606                                   P.O. Box 1347
    (3 12) 876-8000                                     Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                        (302) 658-9200
    
                                                        ASHBY & GEDDES
                                                        Stephen E. Jenkins
                                                        Richard D. Heins
                                                        222 Delaware Avenue, 17'h Floor
                                                        P.O. Box 1150
                                                        Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                        (302) 654-1888
    
    January  8,200l
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DEILAWARE
  • ANDERSON, RICHARD HUBER,
  • DEFENDANTS' OPENING-EERIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR.
  • JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS TI-rE;, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • 222 Delaware Avenue, 17'h Floor
  • Wilmington, DE 19899
  • Count II Must Be Dismissed Because Plainiiff Lacks Standing to Pursue a Derivative Claim.
  • II. Count I, Plaintiffs Purported Class Claim, Must Be Dismissed Because it Asserts a
  • Bonime v. Biaggini, Del.
  • In re Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, Del.

  • 7 . PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CLASS ACTION
    DEFENDANTS
    COMMON
    COURT
    SPECIALTY
    LAW
    PLANS
    CERTIFICATION
    STOCK
    MEMBERS
    DEL
    CHANCERY RULE
    COUNSEL
    DELAWARE
    ADEQUATELY PROTECT
    PROXY STATEMENT
    JAMES KNOLL
    DIRECTORS
    EXERCISE PRICE
    FAIR MARKET
    REPRESENTING
    RICHARD HUBER
    EQUIPMENT COMPANIES
    LAW OFFICES
    TERRENCE BUEHLER
    DEUTSCHMAN
    EMPLOYEE PLAN
    INCENTIVE PLANS
    LITIGATION
    
                                                   ORIGINAL
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------~
    VIRGINIA A.  NOERR,
    
             Plaintiff,
    
             V.
    
    DANIEL GREENWOOD,  TH0MA.S                                              Civil Action No. 14320 NC
    ANDERSON, RICHARD HUBER,
    CHARLES HUTCHINSON, RICHARD KENT,                                  :
    BARRY  MACLEAN, GERTA KNOLL,
    EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
    JAMES KNOLL, and SPECIALTY
    EQUIPMENT COMPANIES, INC.,
    
             Defendants.
    --------------------------------------------------------------~
    
                               PILAINTIFF'S  OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                      OF HER MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION
    
    
                                                  ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS  &
                                                   GODDESS, P.A.
                                                  Norman M. Monhait
                                                  Suite 1401, Mellon Bank Center
                                                  919 N. Market Street
                                                  Wilmington, DE 19899-1070
                                                  (302) 656-4433
                                                  Attorneys for Plaintiff
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    
    LAW OFFICES OF  TERRENCE BUEHLER
    120 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1150
    Chicago, IL 60602
    (3 12) 345-2004
    
    
    December 12, 2000
    
    
    
                                     u,BLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • JAMES KNOLL, and SPECIALTY
  • OF HER MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION
  • LAW OFFICES OF TERRENCE BUEHLER
  • PLAINTIFF SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS OF
  • Are Common To Those Of The
  • Del.
  • Plaintiff, a shareholder of Specialty Equipment Companies, Inc. ("Specialty" or the
  • "Company"), commenced this action on June 24, 1995, to challenge Defendants' self-dealing
  • Executive L,ong-Term Incentive Plau and the Non-Management Directors' Long-Term
  • the "plans"); 2) their submission of the Plans for stockholder
  • approval via a false and misleading proxy statement; and 3) their awarding of stock options
  • Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 23,
  • and designating PlaintifT's counsel as Class counsel.
  • directors and the members of Speci,alty's "Stock Incentive Committee," and James Knoll (who
  • Richard Huber had been nominated to be an "outside" director, but was not seated until May,
  • The Proxy Statement disclosed that under the Employee Plan, "the exercise price.
  • the grant date."3 "Fair Market Value" was not defined, but would be determined "in good
  • Plan (representing 93% of the options available).
  • 485 U.S. 224 (securities litigation);
  • the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the
  • Deutschman v. Beneficial Corp., 132 F.R.D. 359, 371
  • As shown by the Firm Resume of the Law Offices of Terrence Buehler attached as
  •    |