UFH ENDOWMENT v HEALTH PROFESSIONALS


\|

Keywords & Phrases

CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,020, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: UFH ENDOWMENT, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016020, Conversion, Common Stock, Summary Judgment, Response, Prices, Conversion Rights, Damages, Motion, Debentures, Contracts, Sirota, Relief, Certificate, Support, Halifax Fund, Del, Amount, Mathesonl, Zimmerman, Home Shopping Network, Jacobs, Deny, Admits, Honor Plaintiffs, Remedy, Plaintiffs Demanded Conversion, Misconduct , ContentID: 120241041

Case Documents

1999-06-18

PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below ] ItemID: 103245

6 pages
PDF

Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages

Price: $ 19.95

IVESLCD01 KGI0001

1 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS

DEFENDANT
CONVERSION
COMMON STOCK
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RESPONSE
PRICES
CONVERSION RIGHTS
DAMAGES
MOTION
DEBENTURES
CONTRACTS
SIROTA
RELIEF
CERTIFICATE
SUPPORT
HALIFAX FUND
DEL
AMOUNT
MATHESONL
ZIMMERMAN
HOME SHOPPING NETWORK
JACOBS
LAW
DENY
ADMITS
HONOR PLAINTIFFS
REMEDY
PLAINTIFFS DEMANDED CONVERSION
MISCONDUCT

        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

--------------------------------- X
UFH ENDOWMENT LTD., and                :
GUARANTEE & FINANCING CORP.,           ::         CIVIL ACTION
                                                 NO. 16020-NC
                       Plaintiffs,     ::
             V .                       :
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, INC.,            ::
                       Defendant.
---------------------------- -- --- H




                         PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN
                    SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT








                                             ROSENTHAL MONHAIT GROSS ik
                                               GODDESS, P.A.
                                             Norman Monhait, Esq.
                                             Edward B. Rosenthal, Esq.
                                             Suite 1401, Mellon Bank Center
                                             P.O. Box 1070
                                             Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                             Attorneys for Plaintiffs
                                             UFH Endowment Ltd. and
                                             Guarantee & Financing Corp.



                                       TABLE OF CONTENTS



TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      

ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SNIPPETS:

PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN

Halifax Fund, L.P. v. Response USA, Inc., Del.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. v. Mathesonl, Del.

Home Shopping Network, Del.

No. 1091 l/l 0919, Jacobs, V.C..

Plaintiffs respectfully submit this memorandum of law in reply to defendant's answering brief

Defendant admits that it issued the Convertible Debentures to plaintiffs and further admits

Defendant also does not contend that it took any steps whatsoever to honor plaintiffs' right

If defendant wished to mitigate the damages, it should have issued plaintiffs the common

Defendant's only quarrel with plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is that the relief

Defendant alone should bear the consequences of its continuing wrong because the increase in

and now defendant erroneously attempts to cloak its non-feasance as an attempt by plaintiff

In doing so, Defendant has not presented a legally valid defense to its breach of contract,

681A.2d 392; Zimmerman v.

Rachel1 Sirota, Esq.

and this Certificate of Service to be served on the following in the


\|