LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BEHRENS v SILLERMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,355, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BEHRENS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016355, Marquee, Sfx, Fees, Merger, Settlement, Expenses, Tytel, Del, Proposed Settlement, Common Stock, Shareholders, Delaware, Sillerman, Sfx Entertainment, Merger Agreement, Market Price, Shareholders Litiq, Michael Letis, Oppenheimer, Certification, Amended Mou, Michael Trager, William Allard, Typicality , ContentID: 120241035

Case Documents
1 2000-09-22 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103158
36 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 36 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SFX
FEES
MERGER
SETTLEMENT
DEFENDANTS
COUNSEL
COURT
EXPENSES
TYTEL
DEL
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
COMMON STOCK
ATTORNEYS
SHAREHOLDERS
DELAWARE
PLAINTIFF
SILLERMAN
SFX ENTERTAINMENT
MERGER AGREEMENT
MARKET PRICE
SHAREHOLDERS LITIQ
MICHAEL LETIS
OPPENHEIMER
CERTIFICATION
AMENDED MOU
LITIGATION
MICHAEL TRAGER
WILLIAM ALLARD
TYPICALITY
                                      ORIGINAL
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

__-  -  -  -  -  -  -  --          -  -  -  -  - - x
HElRBERT BEHRENS,

                             P la intiff,

         V .                                             Civil Action No. 16355 NC

ROBERT F.X. SILLERMAN, HOWARD J. :
TYTEL, ARTHUR C. KAMINSKY,
MICHAEL  LETIS, LOUIS J. OPPENHEIM, :
MICHAEL TRAGER, WILLIAM  ALLARD,
ARTHUR W.  BARRON, DONALD L. DELL, :
MYLES W. SCHUMER, THE MARQUEE
GROUP, INC. and SFX ENTERTAINMENT, :
INC.,

                             Defendants.
_  _  -  -  _  _  -  _.  _  _  -  -  -  -  -  -  - -;



                PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
                AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES  .AND EXPENSES


                                             ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS  &
                                              GODDESS, P.A.
                                             Joseph A. Rosenthal
                                             Norman M. Monhait
                                             Suite 1401, Mellon Bank Center
                                             P.O. Box 1070
                                             Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                             (302) 656-4433

                                             Attorneys for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

ABBEY, GARDY  & SQUITIERI, LLP
Arthur N. Abbey
Stephen J.  Fearon, Jr.
212 East 39th Street
New York, New York 10016
(212) 889-3700

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
  • AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES .AND EXPENSES
  • Discussions With Defendants Leading To
  • SFX And Marquee Restructure The Merger After
  • Cjitron v. Earle M. Jorqensen Co., Del.
  • &n Re Arcadian Corporation Shareholders Litig.,
  • In Re Chips and Technoloqies, Inc. Shareholders Litiq., Del.
  • and an award of counsel fees and expenses for
  • Plaintiff Herbert Behrens brought this Action on behalf
  • merger of Marquee by SFX Entertainment Inc.
  • Tytel Tr.
  • SFX's Class A common stock was trading at approximately
  • reduce the break-up fee in the Merger Agreement from $5,000,000 to
  • Under the Amended MOU, if the average market price of SFX common
  • Defendants Robert F.X. Sillerman, Howard J. Tytel, Arthur
  • Kaminsky, Michael Letis, Louis Oppenheimer, Michael Trager,
  • William Allard, Arthur R. Barron, Donald L. Dell, and Myles Schumer
  • and defendants Kaminsky, Letis, Oppenheimer
  • Class certification is proper if common questions ofi law
  • Typicality And Adequacy
  • of the fee; the difficulty of the litigation; and the
  •    |