LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BAKS v MOUROUN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,810, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BAKS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016810, Moroun, Dividend, Centra, Judgement, Summary Judgment, Statute, Shareholders, Limitations, Stock, Motion, Business Judgment, Delaware, Settlement Resolution, Escheat, Directors, Settlement, Del, Support, Dkt, Res Judicata, Complaint, Mcfarland, Harned Plan, Second Herring, Facts, Disqualification, Anne Moroun, Demand, Cash Dividend, Authorities, Representation, Affidavit, Constitution, Board Majority, Shareholder, Compromise, Agnes, Stockholder, Business Judgment Rule, Conflict, Castle County , ContentID: 120241025

Case Documents
1 1999-04-14 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103020
14 pages
PDF
2 1999-04-13 MEMO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103021
7 pages
PDF
3 1999-04-13 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103019
24 pages
PDF
4 1999-04-07 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103531
17 pages
PDF
5 1999-04-07 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103022
17 pages
PDF
6 1999-03-18 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103023
61 pages
PDF
7 1999-02-08 MOTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103628
4 pages
PDF
8 1999-02-08 AFFIDAVIT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103532
3 pages
PDF
9 1999-02-08 BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103025
33 pages
PDF
10 1999-02-08 BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103024
32 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 10 documents , 212 pages
Price: $ 64.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JUDGEMENT
SETTLEMENT
DEFENDANT
CENTRA
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COURT
DELAWARE
PLAINTIFFS
SUPR
CASH DIVIDEND
DEL
DIRECTORS
DEFENDANT AGNES
SUPPORT
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORN
MICHIGAN
ANNE MOROUN
BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
RES JUDICATA
SHAREHOLDER
DISINTERESTED DIRECTORS
DEFENDANT MANUEL
CROSS-MOTION
AUTHORITIES
SUMMARY JUDGMENT PERMITTING
PANHANDLE EASTERN CORN
RESTATEMENT
UNDISPUTED FACT
SUPERIOR COURT DECISION
      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

VICTORIA M. BAKS and                          )
FLORENCE M. McBRIEN,                          11
                   Plaintiffs,                ))
      V.                                      >      C.A. No. 16810 NC
                                              1
MANUEL J. MOROUN, NORA                        1
MOROUN, MATTHEW T. MOROUN,                    )
AGNES A. MOROUN, NORMAN E.                    1
HARNED, ROBERT E. MCFARLAND,                  >
DANIEL STAMPER and ANDRE P.                   )
LEVESQUE,                                     1>
                   Defendants,                ))
      -and-                                   11
CENTRA, INC.,                                 1
a Delaware corporation,                       11
                   Nominal Defendant.         )


                      REPLY BRIEF OF THE DEFENDANT
                  AGNES A. MOROUN IN SUPPORT  OF HER
                 CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY  JUDGMENT


                                         MORRIS, JAMES, HITCHENS & WILLIAMS
                                         Grover C. Brown (I.D. No. 2339)
                                         222 Delaware Avenue
                                         P. 0. Box 2306
                                         Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                         (302) 888-6800
                                         Attorneys for Defendant Agnes A. Moroun
Dated: April 14, 1999



                                    TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                Page

TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

       THE DEFENDANT AGNES A. MOROUN' IS
       ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT PERMITTING
       HER TO ACCEPT THE SETTLEMENT OFFERED TO HER
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES.
  • THE DEFENDANT AGNES A. MOROUN' IS ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT PERMITTING HER TO ACCEPT THE
  • THE DEFENDANT CENTRA, INC
  • Supr., 545 A.2d 1171.
  • Aronson v. Lewis, Del.
  • Restatement of Judgments $59.
  • It should now be apparent that the true relief sought by the plaintiffs against
  • as a shareholder to receive her proportionate share of a $6 million cash dividend
  • For this reason plaintiffs want it held that Anne Moroun thereby forfeited her right to later
  • claim her share of the cash dividend from the corporation itself in the event that the
  • Plaintiffs' response is that the Business Judgment Rule does not apply
  • because, in their subjective view, none of the disinterested directors who unanimously
  • defendant Manuel J. Moroun, and, secondly, because the issuance of stock to Ms.
  • claim, if brought in Michigan, could be barred by the affirmative defense of res judicata.
  • it is also an undisputed fact that none of the six directors
  • appears to be that if the six disinterested directors voting for the settlement proposal had
  • Superior Court decision proved to be unsuccessful.
  • Anadarko Petroleum Corn v. Panhandle Eastern Corn,
  • Nor does Q 59of the Restatement support the plaintiffs' argument.
  • Brief Of The Defendant Agnes A. Moroun In Support Of Her Cross-Motion For Summary

  • 2 . MEMO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COUNSEL
    CONSENT
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    REPRESENTATION
    PLAINTIFFS
    DIRECTORS
    CONFLICT
    DKT
    ADVERSE
    MOTION
    CLIENTS
    MOROUN
    DISQUALIFY
    LAWYERS
    LIMITATIONS DEFENSE
    ADVERSELY AFFECT
    JOINT REPRESENTATION
    COURT
    DELAWARE LAWYERS
    BAKS
    SUPPORT
    ARGUE
    STATUTE
    LITIGATION
    LITIGATION STRATEGY
    CORPORATE DEFENDANT
    PAPERS
    AFFIDAVITS
    OPENING
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS and
    FLORENCE M. McBRIEN,
    
                       Plaintiffs,
    
             V.                                  >      C.A. No. 16810                         _;
                                                 >
    MANUEL J. MOROUN,                            >
    NORA MOROUN,                                 >
    MATTHEW T. MOROUN,                           )
    -AGNES A. MOROUN,                            1
    NORMAN E. HARNED,                            )
    ROBERT E. MCFARLAND,                         )
    DANIEL STAMPER and                           >
    ANDRE P. LEVESQUE,                           >>
              -and-                              ))
    CENTRA, INC., a Delaware corporation,        ))
                       Nominal Defendant.        )
    
    
                     REPLY MEMORANDUM OF PLAINTIFFS BAKS AND MCBRIEN
                           IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISOUALIFY
    
              On March 18, 1999, plaintiffs Victoria M. Baks ("Baks") and Florence M. McBrien
    
    ("McBrien") (together, "Plaintiffs"), moved the Court to disqualify Daniel L.  McKenty, Esq. and
    
    David A. Domina, Esq., and their respective law firms (together, "Counsel"), from continuing to
    
    represent the individual director-defendants Matthew T. Moroun, Norman E. Hamed, Robert E.
    
    McFarland, Daniel Stamper and Andre R. Levesque (collectively, the "Individual Defendants"), and
    
    corporate defendant CenTra, Inc. ("CenTra" or the "Company"), in this action. (Dkt. 55). On
    
    April 7, 1999, the Individual Defendants and CenTra filed a brief in opposition to the motion to
    
    
    
    
    FUFl-213143-I
    
    
    
    disqualify. (Dkt. 58). This is Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of their Motion to
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • REPLY MEMORANDUM OF PLAINTIFFS BAKS AND MCBRIEN
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISOUALIFY
  • , moved the Court to disqualify Daniel L. McKenty, Esq.
  • corporate defendant CenTra, Inc., in this action.
  • (Dkt.
  • April 7, 1999, the Individual Defendants and CenTra filed a brief in opposition to the motion
  • The issues, as framed by the briefs and ancillary papers, are straightforward:
  • CenTra as required by Rule 1.7of the Delaware Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct?
  • multiple representation, could Counsel have reasonably believed that representation of the
  • Defendants would not adversely affect CenTra's interests?
  • was never a unanimous written consent of the Board consenting to the conflict on behalf of
  • affidavits to the contrary notwithstanding.
  • A Direct Conflict Exists Between The Individual Defendants And CenTra.
  • the interests of the non-shareholder directors are not implicated by this lawsuit.
  • position that CenTra's statute of limitations defense is defective and/or should not be
  • Moroun") and Agnes A. Moroun's
  • There Has Been No Consent From Both Clients.
  • CenTra and the Individual Defendants appear to argue that since it is the Board
  • believe" that the joint representation would not adversely affect the interests of either
  • Plaintiffs demonstrated above and in their opening papers, Counsel has taken a litigation
  • demonstrate that the litigation strategy employed by Counsel has an actual adverse effect on
  • Instead, Plaintiffs' point is merely that having chosen a litigation strategy which actively

  • 3 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MOROUN
    DEFENDANTS
    DIVIDEND
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    PLAINTIFFS
    DELAWARE
    SUPPORT
    SHAREHOLDERS
    LIMITATIONS
    MOTION
    STOCK
    DEL
    STATUTE
    HARNED PLAN
    LIMITATIONS DEFENSE
    NORA MOROUN
    ESCHEAT LAWS
    DIRECTORS
    WILMINGTON TRUST
    STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT
    SETTLEMENT
    CHANCERY
    STATEMENTOFFACTS
    UNCLAIMED DIVIDENDS
    AFFIDAVIT
    CORPORATE OFFICERS
    MICHIGAN
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    COMPENSATION
    
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS and                       1
    FLORENCE M. McBRIEN,                       ))
                     Plaintiffs,               1) C. A. No. 16810 NC
                     V.                        >)
    MANUEL J. MOROUN,                          )
    NORA MOROUN,                               >
    MATTHEW T. MOROUN,                         )
    AGNES A. MOROUN,                           )
    NORMAN E. HARNED,                          )
    ROBERT E. M                                                                                  .
                      CFARLAND,                )
    DANIEL STAMPER and                         )
    ANDRE P. LEVESQUE,                         >1                                           >
                                                                                  ,
                     Defendants,               1                                  -.        I_  ;
                                               >
          - and -                              1>
    CENTRA, INC.,                              1
    a Delaware corporation,                    >1
                     Nominal Defendant.        1
    
                                     REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS
                             MANUEL J. MOROUN AND NORA MOROUN
              IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
                                                     BIGGS AND BATTAGLIA
    
    
                                                     Victor F. Battaglia
                                                     Robert D. Goldberg
                                                     1800 Mellon Bank Center
                                                     P.O. Box 1489
                                                     Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                     (302) 655-9677
                                                      Attorneys for Defendants Manuel J.
                                                      Moroun and Nora Moroun
    
    Dated: April 13, 1999
    
    
    
                                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    TABLEOFCONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • MANUEL J. MOROUN AND NORA MOROUN IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • STATEMENTOFFACTS
  • Which Is Not Barred by the Statute of Limitations
  • Render Plaintiffs' Limitations Argument Irrelevant
  • Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.,Del.
  • Keller v. President and Directors of Farmers Bank of the State of Delaware,
  • Wilmington Trust Comnanv v. Wilmington Trust Company,
  • "Company") from settling claims to a contested dividend purportedly enacted by
  • plaintiffs seek to have this Court overturn the settlement
  • Through their several counsels, the shareholders, the
  • Answering defendants M.
  • not all shareholders are treated equally in the Harned Plan.
  • plaintiffs again attack an agreement (the "Stock Restriction
  • Plaintiffs' motivation for attacking the Stock Restriction Agreement undoubtedly
  • paragraph of his affidavit does he, in passing, charge the Deloitte and Touche analysis did
  • the board of CenTra is not independent and, therefore, not protected by the business judgment
  • committed to fidelity to all its shareholders which refused to assert a limitations defense
  • The Escheat Laws In Both Delaware And Michigan
  • As shown in defendants' opening brief, unclaimed dividends go to the state and can

  • 4 . RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    MOTION
    DISQUALIFICATION
    DEFENDANTS
    COUNSEL
    SETTLEMENT RESOLUTION
    BOARD MAJORITY
    REPRESENTATION
    DELAWARE
    DOMINA
    DIRECTORS
    MOROUN
    LAWYERS
    CONFLICT
    CONFLICTING DUTIES
    INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    LITIGATION
    SUPERIOR COURT
    INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DOMINA LAW
    MCFARLAND
    SUPERIOR COURT SUIT
    INCONSISTENT
    DIRECTLY ADVERSE
    PARAGRAPH
    ATTORNEYS
    
                    IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS, et al.,                 >>
                            Plaintiffs,       >     C.A. No. 16,810
    
                    V.
    
    MANUEL J. MOROUN, et al.,.
    
                            Defendants.
    
    
                                      RESPONSE OF DEFENDANTS
                             M.T. MOROUN, N. HARNED, R. MCFARLAND,
                           D. STAMPER, A. LEVESQUE, AND CENTRA, INC.
                          TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL
    
    
    
    
                                                    WENDELBURG, MCCULLOUGH &
                                                    McKENTY, P.A.
                                                    Daniel L. McKenty
                                                    Steven F. Mones                 r-
                                                    824 Market Street, Fourth Floor
                                                    P.O. Box 397
                                                    Wilmington, DE  19899-0397                 '
                                                    (302) 655-6749                        _
    
                                                    DOMINA LAW pc
                                                    David A. Domina
                                                    W. Craig Howell
                                                    1065 N. 115th St., Suite 150
                                                    Omaha, Nebraska 68 154-4423
                                                    (402) 493-4100
    
                                                    Attorneys for Defendants
                                                    M.T. Moroun, N. Harned, R. McFarland,
                                                    D. Stamper, A. Levesque, and CenTra, Inc.
    
    April 7,1999
    
    
    
                                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
                                                                                                       
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • MANUEL J. MOROUN, et al.,.
  • M.T. MOROUN, N. HARNED, R. MCFARLAND,
  • STAMPER, A. LEVESQUE, AND CENTRA, INC.
  • TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL
  • Do Not Involve Conflicting Duties
  • Delaware Lawyers' Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7.
  • action authorized an ofir to settle pending and potential litigation against the Company.
  • of settlement, adopted by the votes of unaffected directors, i.e., persons
  • and two other shareholders with dividend claims.
  • Settlement Resolution and thereby prevent their siblings from being
  • The disqualification motion, like the original litigation, does not withstand scrutiny.
  • Defendants tiled to support their motions for summary judgment.
  • Independent Directors are represented by Wendelburg, McCullough & McKenty,
  • P.A. and Domina Law pc.
  • McBrien first filed a Superior Court suit to collect a contested dividend.
  • Before the Answers were filed, the majority of the individual directors considered,
  • The Board majority seek a case-dispositive summary judgment, i.e., they seek to have all
  • without conflict.
  • The directors each consented to representation by WMM and Domina Law,
  • representation directly adverse to that client without that client's consent.
  • Paragraph expresses that general Rule.
  • not assertion of inconsistent
  • that attorneys who undertake multiple representations will:

  • 5 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SETTLEMENT RESOLUTION
    CENTRA
    DIVIDEND
    COURT
    JUDGEMENT
    MOROUN
    LITIGATION
    MOTION
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    MANUEL
    DEFENDANTS
    SETTLE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MCFARLAND
    SUPPORT
    PAY
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    DIRECTORS
    BOARD MAJORITY
    PRUDENT BUSINESS
    LIMITATIONS
    OFFERING SETTLEMENT TERMS
    AFFIDAVIT
    WILMINGTON TRUST
    CHANCERY COURT
    OPPOSITION
    AUTHORITIES
    ANADARKO PETROLEUM
    DERIVATIVE ACTION
    
                                                                                              57
                     IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS, et al.,                  >1
                              Plaintiffs,      1     C.A. No. 16,810
    
                     V.
    
    MANUEL J. MOROUN, et al.,.
    
                              Defendants.      1
    
    
                                             REPLY BRIEF
                OF DEFENDANTS M.T. MOROUN, N. HARNED, R. MCFARLAND,
                     D. STAMPER, A. LEVESQUE, AND CENTRA, INC. IN SUPPORT
                           OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN
             OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
    
                                                     WENDELBURG, MCCULLOUGH &
                                                     McKENTY,  P.A.
                                                     Daniel L. McKenty
                                                     Steven F. Mones
                                                     824 Market Street. Fourth Floor
                                                     P.O. Box 397
                                                     Wilmington, DE 19899-0397
                                                     (302) 6556749
    
                                                     DOMINA LAW pc
                                                     David A. Domina
                                                     W. Craig Howell
                                                     1065 N. 115th St., Suite I50
                                                     Omaha, Nebraska 68 154-4423
                                                     (402) 493-4 100
    
                                                     Attorneys for Defendants
                                                     M.T. Moroun, N. Harned, R. McFarland,
                                                     D. Stamper, A. Levesque, and CenTra. Inc.
    
    April 7, 1999
    
    
    
                                                                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • MANUEL J. MOROUN, et al.,.
  • OF DEFENDANTS M.T. MOROUN, N. HARNED, R. MCFARLAND,
  • OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY
  • INCLUDING WHETHER TO SETTLE LITIGATION
  • THE SETTLEMENT RESOLUTION IS VALID
  • PAY THE DIVIDEND IF IT IS NOT COMPROMISED
  • Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp., Del.Supr., 545 A2d 1171.
  • Wilmington Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co., Del.Ch., 15 A.2d 665.
  • STATUTES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES:
  • Plaintiffs, two of four 1992 CenTra common shareholders, seek to prevent their
  • Corporation and its unafEected Board majority, from offering settlement terms to end, or
  • prudent business decision by an objective CenTra Board majority.
  • Defendants' Opening Brief in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • A CORPORATE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS AUTHORITY
  • within a corporate director's right to make a business judgment.
  • Each director in the Board majority has submitted a separate affidavit in which each has
  • Director McFarland, a Michigan attorney with many clients, supported the Settlement
  • the Plaintiffs attack Matthew Moroun on the ground he is Manuel J.

  • 6 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DIVIDEND
    CENTRA
    JUDGEMENT
    STATUTE
    STOCK
    ESCHEAT
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS
    LIMITATIONS
    MOTION
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    RES JUDICATA
    DKT
    DEL
    SECOND HERRING
    COMPLAINT
    HARNED PLAN
    CONSTITUTION
    STOCKHOLDER
    SECOND HERRING AFF
    SHAREHOLDER
    DIRECTORS
    CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDER
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    MATTHEW MOROUN
    CORPORATE WASTE
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    AGNES MOROUN
    DISINTERESTEDNESS
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE               65-0
                                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS and                          >
    FLORENCE M. McBRIEN,                          )
    
                        Plaintiffs,
    
             V .                                  j          C.A. No. 16810
                                                  >
    MANUEL J. MOROUN,                             1
    NORA MOROUN,                                  >
    MATTHEW T. MOROUN,                            1
    AGNES A. MOROUN,                              >
    NORMAN E. HARNED,
    ROBERT E. MCFARLAND,                          1
    DANIEL STAMPER and                            >
    ANDRE P. LEVESQUE,                            >
    
             - and -
                                                  )
    CENTRA, INC., a Delaware corporation,         )
                                                  )
                        Nominal Defendant.        >
    
    
                     PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION
                         FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO
           DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO DISMISS
    
    
    
    
                                                  Gregory V. Varallo
                                                  Kelly A. Herring
                                                  Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
                                                  One Rodney Square
                                                  P.O. Box 551
                                                  Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                       Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Dated: March 18, 1999
    
    
    
    RLFl-210013-I
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • - and -PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION
  • FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO
  • COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT
  • The Doctrine Of Res Judicata
  • The Statute Of Limitations Begins To Run On
  • Issuance Of Stock In Exchange For A Claim Barred
  • M.J. Moroun To The Dividend In Order To Provide
  • Whether Or Not The Dividend Is Subject To Escheat
  • Corporate Waste And Is Invalid
  • Because Issuance Of CenTra Stock To Either A.A. Moroun
  • The Delaware Constitution and Section 152 Of The
  • There Can Be No Business Judgment Rule Presumption
  • The Board's Approval Of The Harned Plan Has No
  • Del.
  • Directors and Co. of Farmers Bank of State of Delaware,
  • Exposed to plaintiffs' potent allegations of waste as a matter of law,
  • corporation thereafter decline to assert such defense against the shareholder on "equitable"
  • motion to dismiss (Dkt.
  • Until transferring a substantial number of his CenTra shares to his son, directordefendant
  • The original complaint filed in the Sisters' Michigan Action is attached to the Second
  • (Second Herring Aff Ex.
  • In the A.A. Moroun Dividend Action, Agnes Moroun sought to compel her brother,

  • 7 . MOTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DELAWARE
    COURT
    MOROUN
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    BATTAGLIA
    ESQUIRE
    WILMINGTON
    MOTION
    CHANCERY
    CASTLE COUNTY
    VICTOR
    BIGGS
    HEREBY
    COMPLAINT
    PLAINTIFFS
    SETTLEMENT
    CERTIFICATE
    MCKENTY
    BROWN
    COUNSEL
    GREGORY
    VARALLO
    RICHARDS
    LAYTON
    FINGER
    RODNEY SQUARE
    DANIEL
    WENDELBURG
    MCCULLOUGH
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                          IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS and                            )
    FLORENCE M. McBRIEN,                            )1
                       Plaintiffs,                  1)
          V.                                        1       C.A. No. 16810 NC
                                                    1
    MANUEL J. MOROUN, NORA                          )
    MOROUN, MATTHEW T. MOROUN,                      )
    AGNES A. MOROUN, NORMAN E.                      1
    HARNED, ROBERT E. MCFARLAND,                    )
    DANIEL STAMPER and ANDRE P.                     1
    LEVESQUE,                                       )>
                       Defendants,                  ))
          -and-                                     1)
    CENTRA, INC.,                                   )
    a Delaware corporation,                         1)
                       Nominal Defendant.           )
    
                                      NOTICE OF MOTION
    
    TO: Gregory V. Varallo, Esquire                 Daniel L. McKenty, Esquire
          Richards, Layton & Finger                  Wendelburg, McCullough & McKenty
          One Rodney Square                          824 Market Street - 4th Floor
          Wilmington, Delaware 19801                 Wilmington, Delaware 19801
    
                               Victor F. Battaglia, Esquire
                               Biggs & Battaglia
                               1800 Mellon  Bank  Center
                               Wilmington, Delaware 19801
    
    
    
                     PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached Motion Of Defendant Agnes A.
    
    Moroun For Summary Judgment will be presented to the Court at a date and time
    
    convenient to the Court.
    
                                            MORRIS, JAMES, HITCHENS  & WILLIAMS
    
    
    
    
                                            222 Delaware Avenue
                                            P. 0. Box 2306
                                            Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • Victor F. Battaglia, Esquire
  • Biggs & Battaglia
  • Wilmington, Delaware 19801
  • PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached Motion Of Defendant Agnes A.
  • Moroun For Summary Judgment will be presented to the Court at a date and time
  • MOTION OF DEFENDANT AGNES A. MOROUN
  • dismissing the complaint of the plaintiffs as to her.
  • the settlement offer made to her by the Defendant CenTra, Inc. which she has accepted,
  • CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  • I, Grover C. Brown, hereby certify that two copies of the attached Motion
  • 1999 to the following counsel of record at the addresses indicated:
  • Gregory V. Varallo, Esquire
  • Richards, Layton & Finger
  • One Rodney Square
  • Daniel L. McKenty, Esquire
  • Wendelburg, McCullough & McKenty

  • 8 . AFFIDAVIT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MOROUN
    CIRCUIT COURT
    DEFENDANT
    STOCK
    CENTRA
    OAKLAND
    MICHIGAN
    HERETO
    EXHIBIT
    AGNES
    SWORN
    BAKS
    STOCK RESTRICTION
    AGREEMENT
    PRICE
    COMPLAINT
    DEAN
    WITTER
    REYNOLDS
    NEPHEW
    MATTHEW
    SALE
    REFERENCE
    AFORESAID STOCK RESTRICTION
    SETTLEMENT
    JURY DEMAND
    STIPULATION
    ORDER ENTERED THEREON
    AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS and                           1
    FLORENCE M. McBRIEN,                           1)
                        Plaintiffs,                )1
          V.                                       )     C.A. No. 16810 NC
                                                   )
    MANUEL J. MOROUN, NORA                         1
    MOROUN, MA?THEW  T. MOROUN,                    )
    AGNES A. MOROUN, NORMAN E.                     >
    HARNED, ROBERT E,, MCFARLAND,                  )
    DANIEL STAMPER and ANDRE P.                    >
    LEVESQUE,                                      1>
                         Defendants,               )>
          -and-                                    )>
    CENTRA, INC.,                                  1
    a Delaware corporation,,                       1>
                         Nominal Defendant.         1
    
                           SKFFIDAVIT  OF AGNES A. MOROUN
    
    STATE OF MICHIGAN                   >1 ss:
    COUNTY OF OAKLAND                   )
    
    
                   Agnes A. Moroun, having been duly sworn according to law, did depose and
    
    say as follows:
    
    
    
                    1.    I am a  defendant named in the above-captioned action and the sister
    
    of the defendant Manuel J. Moroun and the plaintiffs Victoria M. Baks and Florence M.
    
    McBrien.  I am a signatory to the Stock Restriction Agreement entered into between the
    
    four of us and the defendant corporation CenTra, Inc. on November 23, 1970.
    
                    2.    During the latter part of 1994, in a transaction ultimately consummated
    
    in early 1995, I sold my common stock in the defendant CenTra, Inc. to my nephew,
    
    Matthew T. Moroun. T,he price for the sale of my stock interests was determined with
    
    reference to the price formula contained in Article 2 of the aforesaid Stock Restriction
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • SKFFIDAVIT OF AGNES A. MOROUN
  • I am a defendant named in the above-captioned action and the sister
  • I am a signatory to the Stock Restriction Agreement entered into between the
  • four of us and the defendant corporation CenTra, Inc. on November 23, 1970.
  • in early 1995, I sold my common stock in the defendant CenTra, Inc. to my nephew,
  • Matthew T. Moroun.
  • T,he price for the sale of my stock interests was determined with
  • reference to the price formula contained in Article 2 of the aforesaid Stock Restriction
  • 1998 I timely accepted the settlement offer of the
  • Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a copy of the Complaint filed in the
  • in the Circuit Court for the County of Oakland, Michigan.
  • Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a copy of the First Amended
  • Complaint and Jury Demand in the case of CenTra, Inc., et al. v. Dean, Witter, Reynolds,
  • Inc., et al., Case No. 92-438547-CZ in the Circuit Court for the County of Oakland,
  • Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a copy of a Stipulation Of Dismissal
  • and the Order entered thereon in Baks, et al. v. Moroun, et al., Case 92-438547-CZ in the
  • Further your affiant sayeth naught.
  • SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me, a notary public in and for the

  • 9 . BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CENTRA
    SHAREHOLDERS
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    PLAINTIFFS
    LITIGATION
    MOROUN
    STATUTE
    LIMITATIONS
    COURT
    DEFENDANTS
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    DELAWARE
    FACTS
    DEMAND
    SETTLEMENT RESOLUTION
    MCFARLAND
    COMPROMISE
    DIRECTORS
    PROCEDURAL PREREQUISITES
    EVIDENCE INDEX
    AUTHORITIES
    DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
    PRUDENT BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    DIVIDEND DECLARATION
    COMPLAINT
    TECHNICAL DEFENSE
    COMMON STOCK
    CASTLE COUNTY
    VII
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS, and
    FLORENCE M. McBRIEN,
    
                          Plaintiffs,         >     C.A. No. 16,810
                                              )
                  V.                          )
                                              )
    MANUEL J. MOROUN,                         )
    NORA MOROUN,                              )
    MATTHEW T. MOROUN,                        )
    AGNES A. MOROUN,                          >
    NORMAN E. HARNED,                         >
    ROBERT E. MCFARLAND,                      )
    DANNIE STAMPER, AND                       )
    ANDRE P. LEVESQUE, and                    )
    CENTRA, INC.,                             ))
                  Defendants.                 >
    
         OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS HARNED, MCFARLAND, STAMPER,
                        M. T. MOROUN, LEVESQUE, AND CENTRA, INC.
              IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
      AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
    DOMINA LAW, PC                                  WENDELBURG, MCCULLOUGH  &
    David A. Domina                                 McKENTY, P.A.
    W. Craig Howell                                 Daniel L. McKenty
    1065 n. 115th Street, Suite 150                 Steven F. Mones
    Omaha, NE 68 154-4423                           824 North Market Street, Fourth Floor
    (402) 493-4100                                  P-0. Box 397
    Attorneys for Defendants CenTra, Inc.,          Wilmington, DE 19899-0397
    M.T. Moroun, N. Harned, R. McFarland,           (302) 655-6749
    D. Stamper, and A. Levesque                     Attorneys for Defendants CenTra, Inc.,
                                                    M.T. Moroun, N. Harned, R. McFarland,
                                                    D. Stamper, and A. Levesque
    
    February 8, 1999
    
    
    
                                                                                   TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    Table of Authorities
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS HARNED, MCFARLAND, STAMPER,
  • M. T. MOROUN, LEVESQUE, AND CENTRA, INC.
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR
  • Table of Authorities
  • Statement of the Facts
  • Demand Would Be Futile
  • Business Judgment and Is Valid
  • Dividend If it Is Not Compromised with CenTra's Shareholders
  • The Statute of Limitations May Not Have Commenced
  • Procedural Prerequisites to Derivative Litigation

  • 10 . BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    DEFENDANT
    COURT
    DIVIDEND
    STOCK
    SETTLEMENT
    ANNE MOROUN
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DELAWARE
    AGNES
    DEL
    DIRECTORS
    EXHIBIT
    AFFIDAVIT
    CASH DIVIDEND
    CASTLE COUNTY
    PLAINTIFFS BAKS
    STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT
    COMMON STOCK
    AUTHORITIES
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    RONALD LECH
    SUPREME COURT
    SUPERIOR COURT
    JAFFE FIRM
    PREJUDICE
    SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    VICTORIA M. BAKS and                            )
    FLORENCE M.  McBRIEN,                           ))
                         Plaintiffs,                11
          V.                                        1      C.A. No. 16810 NC
                                                    1
    MANUEL J. MOROUN,  NORA                         )
    MOROUN, MATTHEW T. MOROUN,                      )
    AGNES A. MOROUN, NORMAN  E.                     1
    HARNED, ROBERT E. MCFARLAND,                    )
    DANIEL STAMPER and ANDRE P.
    LEVESQUE,
    
                         Defendants,
    
          -and-
    
    CENTRA, INC. 9
    a Delaware corporation,
    
                         Nominal Defendant.
    
    
                       ANSWERING BRIEF OF THE DEFENDANT
                         AGNES A. MOROUN IN OPPOSITION TO
                   PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
                      AND OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HER
                      CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
                                               MORRIS, JAMES,  HITCHENS &WILLIAMS
                                               Grover C. Brown (I.D. No. 2339)
                                               222 Delaware Avenue
                                               P. 0. Box 2306
                                               Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                               (302) 888-6800
                                               Attorneys for Defendant Agnes A. Moroun
    February 8_, 1999
    
    
    
                                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • ANSWERING BRIEF OF THE DEFENDANT
  • AGNES A. MOROUN IN OPPOSITION TO
  • PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES.
  • OF THE PURPORTED DIVIDEND, IF IT IS
  • ANNE MOROUN UPHOLDING THE VALIDITY
  • OF THE CORPORATION'S SETTLEMENT
  • Aronson v. Lewis, Del.
  • shareholders to buy out their minority stock interests at a price greater than the corporation
  • four shareholders and the corporation in 1970.
  • a jury verdict against the corporation in the Superior Court in and for New Castle County
  • for their share of a supposed $6 million cash dividend purportedly declared in 1992.
  • corporation and its directors back on their heels, the sisters moved for summary judgment,
  • owners of all of the issued and outstanding common stock of the defendant corporation,
  • " A copy of the Stock Restriction Agreement is contained in Exhibit
  • B to the Affidavit of Victoria M. Baks; for ease of reference a copy is attached hereto as
  • The plaintiffs Baks and McBrien were unwilling to offer their stock for sale
  • See the strategy memorandum dated November 1, 1990 from the Jaffe firm
  • attendance at the scripted board meeting), and Mr. Harned, the chief financial officer.
  • Ronald Lech.
  • a dismissal without prejudice of all claims against her brother and Mr. Lech,
  • amended complaint against her brother and Ronald Lech.
  • Supreme Court, and that as a consequence she has no potential claim to the dividend to
  • Over a year later in 1993 a second amended complaint was filed in Case 92-438547-CZ on behalf
  •    |