LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST v CREWS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 15,890, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00015890, Crews, Tbc, Honore, Motion, Electra, Settlement, Ryan, Preliminary Injunction, Expenses, Individual Defendants, Hill, Facts, Slc, Irreparable Harm, Funds, Advancements, Affidavit, Paragraph, Del, Farr, Delaware, Directors, Counterclaim, Discovery, Proposed Settlement, Partial Settlement, Kordyback, Agreement, Demonstrare, Undertaking, Electra Investment Trust, Opening, Opinion, Allegation Set, Common Stock, Board Meeting, Scott Steele, Deny, Speak, Robert, Suffer Irreparable Harm, Admit , ContentID: 120240983

Case Documents
1 1999-06-08 ANSWER AND RESPONSE OF ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST ELECTRA ASSOC. AND SCOTT STEELE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102186
8 pages
PDF
2 1999-05-10 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103255
25 pages
PDF
3 1999-05-06 ANSWER OF CREWS TO COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102187
11 pages
PDF
4 1999-05-05 REPLY TO RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103560
10 pages
PDF
5 1999-05-04 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103561
11 pages
PDF
6 1999-05-04 ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103256
29 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 6 documents , 94 pages
Price: $ 44.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ANSWER AND RESPONSE OF ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST ELECTRA ASSOC. AND SCOTT STEELE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COUNTERCLAIM
ALLEGATION SET
SCOTT STEELE
DENY
PARAGRAPH
ADMIT
TBC
COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS
PURSUANT
ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST
INVESTMENT TRUST PLC
CREWS
COURT
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
DELAWARE CORPORATION
ROBERT
DIRECTORS
STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
PURPORTS
PURCHASE
WESTFIELD
MEETING
COUNTERCLAIM FAILS
CHANCERY RULE
RESPONSE
MEMBER
DENY KNOWLEDGE
INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
TRUTH
             THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                        
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,
a company organized under the
the laws of England and
Wales, and ELECTRA
ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,

                           Plaintiffs,

                  -against-                                   Civil Action No. 15 890

ROBERT B. CREWS, JR., DEBORAH
L.M. HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN,
and ROBERT C. HILL, JR.,

                           Defendants,

                  and

THE BENJAMIN COMPANY, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation,

           Nominal Defendant.


THE BENJAMIN COMPANY, INC.,                    i

              Counterclaim Plaintiff,          ;

         -against-                             ;>
ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC, )
ELECTRA ASSOCIATES, INC. and
SCOTT STEELE,                                  ;

             Counterclaim Defendants.


     ANSWER AND RESPONSE OF ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,
                 ELECTRA ASSOCIATES. INC.. AND SCOTT STEELE

                  Counterclaim Defendants Electra Investment Trust PLC and Electra

Associates, Inc. (collectively, "Electra"), and Scott Steele, by their undersigned attorneys,

WP: M:DOCS3WJJ3L\17OE'LEADD39450-1                                                     53133.1001

SNIPPETS:
  • ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,
  • ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
  • and ROBERT C. HILL, JR.,
  • ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,)
  • ANSWER AND RESPONSE OF ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,
  • Counterclaim Defendants Electra Investment Trust PLC and Electra
  • Associates, Inc., and Scott Steele, by their undersigned attorneys,
  • Deny each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 1 of the
  • except admit that TBC purports to assert a counterclaim against Electra
  • Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
  • except admit that third party defendant Scott Steele is a member of the
  • Board of Directors of The Benjamin Company, was designated as such by Electra
  • pursuant to a Stockholders Agreement, entered into by Robert B. Crews, Jr.
  • purchase price of $6,500,000 2,000 shares of TBC's Senior Convertible Preferred
  • form a belief as to the truth of the allegations regarding a meeting held between TBC and
  • Westfield and any statements made at such purported meeting.
  • The Counterclaim fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Court of Chancery Ru:z'12.
  • AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
  • personal jurisdiction pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 12.

  • 2 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CREWS
    TBC
    HONORE
    EXPENSES
    ELECTRA
    PLAINTIFFS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    MOTION
    FARR
    FUNDS
    COURT
    DEMONSTRARE
    AFFIDAVIT
    LITIGATION
    OPENING
    SETTLEMENT
    BOARD MEETING
    ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST
    HONORE DEP
    KORDYBACK
    RESOLUTIONS
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    UNDERTAKING
    CASH PAYMENT
    FINANCIAL CONDITION
    ALLOCATION
    BALANCE SHEET
    DEFENSE COSTS
    
    FROM Vi LLKIE FARR 37 FAX DEFT                        (MN) 5. 10'99 12:2$/'ST. 12:23,"NOm
                                                                                           p-k 1-
                       IN THE COLiKT bF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DEJX5
                                                                                         km
    
                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
            ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,  )                                                         l/G
                                                                                                      c
    
            a company organized under the  1
            the laws of England and                  1
            Wales, and ELECTRA
            ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware             1
            Corporation,
                                                     1
                                 Plaintiffs,         )
                          -against- ;                                  Civil Action No. 15890
                                                     1
            RORERT R. CREWS, JR., DEECXtAH )
            L-M. HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN,
            and  ROBER'I' c.  HILL, JR.,             ;1
                                 Defendants,         1
                          and
                                                     1
             THE BENJAMIN COMPANY, INC.,  1
             a Delaware  Corpora?ion,
                                                     i
                       Nominal Defendant.            1
    
                            PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT
                           OF THEIR MOTIgKFOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
                                                YOUNG  CONAWAY STARGATT  & TAYLOR,  LLF
                                                Bruce L. Silverstein
                                            Martin  3. Lessner
                                                11th Floor, Rodney Square North
                                                P.O. Box  391
                                            Wilmington, Delaware  19899-0393
                                                (302)571-6600
    
    
                                                WILLKIE FARR & GAXIAGHER
                                                Brian E. O'Connor
                                                Eliott  M.  Berman
                                                787 Seventh Avenue
                                                New York, New York            10019-GO99
                                                (212)728-8000
    
                                                Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN,
  • OF THEIR MOTIgKFOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • FROM `f:LLKIE FARR 37 FAX!lZ?T
  • Plaintiffs, Electra Investment Trust PLC and Electra
  • of their motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining nominal
  • and any persons acting in concert or participation with TBC,
  • advancing funds to the individual defendants related Lu defense
  • costs OL this litigation.
  • As previously demonstrated in plaintiffs' opening
  • papers,' the Court should enjoin the advancement: of expenses for
  • defense costs to the individual defendants because advancement of
  • the Court determined to convert the TRO motion t-0 one
  • defendants cannot seek refuge in the business judgment rule
  • As a result, issuance of a preliminary injunction is proper here, unless defendants can
  • advance funds, would be likely to rebut the presumptions of the business judgment rule."
  • TBC Board meeting were prepared by Richards,
  • Honare responded only that one attorney--Jack Jackson (Crews' personal attorney)--miahG have
  • Honore Dep.
  • Dallas Ft. Worth settlement will be dissipated on litigation
  • and hia Reply Affidavit in Further Support of the Motion, sworn to May 10, 1999, submitted
  • did not contain any of the proposed resolutions, nor did it contain any of the undertakings
  • complete description of TBC'S financial condition,
  • when Kordyback was unaware of the
  • Ch., 623 A.2d 82, directors breach their duty of due care if they advance expenses without
  • Defendants contend that the impending settlement with the Dallas Airport, valued by
  • Clrew~~ asked the Board to create an Allocation
  • Account (quantified on the most recent balance sheet at
  • plaintiffs Electra Investment Trust PLC and Electra Associates,

  • 3 . ANSWER OF CREWS TO COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    TBC
    AGREEMENT
    PARAGRAPH
    SPEAK
    EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
    SLC REPORT
    COMPLAINT
    CREWS REFERS
    RYAN
    PRESIDENT
    PURCHASE AGREEMENT
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    SECURITIES PURCHASE
    CREWS REPEATS
    REALLEGES
    FULLY SET
    ELECTRA
    PLC
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    COMMON STOCK
    STEEL
    PLAINTIFFS
    ROBERT
    HONORE
    CALIFORNIA
    ALLEGE CLAIMS
    REASON
    LAWS
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
     ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC and
     ELECTRA ASSOCIATES, INC.,
                                                                  1
                                Plaintiffs,
                                                                  ;
               V.                                                 1         Civil Action No. 15890-NC
    
     ROBERT B. CREWS, JR., DEBORAH L.M.
     HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN, and ROBERT C.
     HILL, JR.,
    
                                Defendants,
    
               -and-
    
     THE BENJAMIN COMPANY, INC.,
    
                                Nominal Defendant.
    
                                 ANSWER OF ROBERT B. CREWS, JR. TO
                                               VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
    
             NOW COMBS Robert B. Crews, Jr. ("Crews") and answers the Complaint in the  above-
    
    captioned action as follows:
    
             1.         Denied. As further answer, Crews states that the action was not properly brought
    
    as a derivative action by reason of Rule 23.1.
    
             2.         Paragraph 2 purports to be a claim against Patricia Ryan; therefore, no answer
    
    required by Crews.
    
             3.         Denied. As further answer, Crews states that the action was not properly brought
    
    as a derivative action because of the failure to make demand as required by Rule 23.1.
    
             4.         Crews is without sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
    
    as to whether Plaintiff Electra Investment PLC ("PLC") is a "company with limited liability
    
    RLF3-1111930-l
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ELECTRA ASSOCIATES, INC.,
  • ROBERT B. CREWS, JR., DEBORAH L.M. HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN, and ROBERT C. HILL, JR.,
  • ANSWER OF ROBERT B. CREWS,
  • as to whether Plaintiff Electra Investment PLC is a "company with limited liability
  • organized under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of business in
  • Crews denies that PLC is a "minority stockholder of TBC."
  • The allegations of Paragraph 6 are denied, except it is admitted that:
  • a citizen of the State of California; Crews is a Director, President and Chief Executive
  • and Crews owns 100% of the common stock of TBC.
  • except it is admitted that: Ryan is a citizen of the Commonwealth of
  • except that it is admitted that a Securities Purchase Agreement was
  • Agreement"), and it is further admitted that the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement
  • speak for themselves.
  • Employment Agreement, dated as of December 20, 1994.
  • except it is admitted that Crews and Electra entered to a Stockholders
  • Denied, except it is admitted that at the date of the filing of the Complaint, the
  • information as to what Steel asked Curtis Haynes or what Steel was told by Haynes.
  • Crews refers to Section V.E. of the SLC Report.
  • Crews is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
  • It is admitted that Crews designated Honore to be a member of the
  • adopting a resolution terminating Crews' employment as President and Chief Executive Officer
  • except it is admitted that Plaintiffs have made no demand upon TBC's
  • Crews repeats and realleges each and every answer and response contained in
  • Paragraph 1 through 39 of this Answer as if fully set forth herein.
  • This Paragraph does not allege claims against Crews, and, therefore, Crews is not
  • Some or all of the claims in the Complaint are barred by reason of the Securities

  • 4 . REPLY TO RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SETTLEMENT
    SLC
    CREWS
    COURT
    LITIGATION
    TBC
    MOTION
    PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
    PROSECUTE
    RESPONSE
    ALLEGE
    SPECIAL LITIGATION
    ASSERTIONS
    PATRICIA RYAN
    LITIGATION COMMITTEE
    OPINION
    PROMISSORY NOTE
    PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
    OFFICER
    ACCOUNT
    RESOLVE
    REASONS
    ROBERT
    OUTSTANDING
    BALANCE
    CONTRAVENTION
    DISCOVERY
    ZAPATA
    INADEQUATE
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY  OF THE STATE OF
                                         DELAWARE
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                                                                              /
    ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC, )
    a company organized under the laws of        )
    England and Wales, and ELECTRA               >
    ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware                 >
    corporation,                                 >       C.A. No.: 15890
                                                 >
                                  Plaintiff,     )
    
    V.                                           i
                                                 >
    ROBERT B. CREWS, JR., DEBORAH                )
    L.M. HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN,
    and ROBERT C. HILL, JR.,                     i>
                                  Defendants,  )
                                                 >
    V.                                           >
    
    THE BENJAMIN COMPANY, INC.,                  `,
    a Delaware corporation,                      >>
                          Nominal Defendant.  )
    
               REPLY OF THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE TO
                       PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE IN OPPPOSITION TO
                    MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
    
           COMES NOW, the Special Litigation Committee, (hereinafter, "SLC" or
    
    "Committee"), by and through its undersigned counsel, and respectfully submits this
    
    reply to Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (the "Response") to The Special Litigation
    
    Committee's Motion for Approval of Partial Settlement (the "Motion").
    
           In an attempt to resolve some of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the best
    
    interests of The Benjamin Company ("TBC"),  and for the reasons set forth in the
    
    paragraphs below, the SLC's  Motion should be granted.
    
    
    
    I.     Terms of the Settlement
    
           As a preliminary matter, and to alleviate any confusion on the part of the
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • REPLY OF THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE TO
  • PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE IN OPPPOSITION TO
  • Committee's Motion for Approval of Partial Settlement.
  • the terms of the proposed partial settlement with Robert B. Crews
  • Crews will execute and deliver to TBC a promissory note in the
  • aggregate principal amount of $325,000, bearing interest at 5%.
  • Security Purchase Agreement between TBC and Electra.
  • the aggregate principal sum of the remaining outstanding balance
  • of the "Due from Officer" account, bearing interest at 8%, minus
  • referred to in paragraph above and the balance of the "Due
  • The SLC submits that the passage
  • The Partial Settlement Proposed by the SLC is Fair Because it Resolves the Most Significant
  • while the Motion before the Court allows for a significant monetary recovery accounting
  • other sundry claims against both Crews and Dr. Patricia Ryan.
  • as Plaintiffs attempt to conduct discovery in five different states
  • Plaintiffs ignore that the Delaware Supreme Court in Zapata Corp. v.
  • it is beyond belief how the Plaintiffs can allege in their Response
  • residence coupled with an agreement to resolve any outstanding "Due From Officer"
  • personal time in contravention of TBC's policy against such activity.
  • opinion, dated February 24, 1999, and is aware that the Court, applying
  • agree with Plaintiffs' assertion that the entire investigation was inadequate.
  • Plaintiffs, for reasons all too clear to the SLC, revert to a discussion of the Opinion as it
  • Short of making these unfounded assertions,

  • 5 . RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CREWS
    PLAINTIFFS
    MOTION
    PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
    COURT
    SLC
    DISCOVERY
    TBC
    FUNDS
    PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
    APPROVE
    OPINION
    PAYMENTS
    DEPOSITION
    MISAPPROPRIATION
    ELECTRA
    MONTHLY ALIMONY
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    REASONS
    OPPOSITION
    INADEQUATE
    SUPPORT
    EXPENSES
    TERMINATE
    CORPORATE ASSETS
    SMITH
    REQUEST
    EXECUTE
    SUBPOENAS
    
                                                                  yYrprPlP(  i-"
                                                          f-i                ('
                                                          ~~i,;t.,r  J,;  i
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,
    a company organized under the
    iaws of England and
    Wales, and ELECTRA                           ;
    ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware                 )
    Corporation,                                 ,'
                            Plaintiffs,          11
                    -against-                    )     Civil Action No. 15890
    ROBERT B. CREWS, JR., DEBORAH                1
    L.M. HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN,
    and ROBERT c. HILL, JR.,                     i
                            Defendants,          i
                     and                         ;
    THE BENJAMIN COMPANY, INC.,                  ;
    a Delaware Corporation,                      !
                            Nominal Defendant. 1                                    .:
    
                        PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
                            THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE'S            --  .-e
                      MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT _ '
    
                    Plaintiffs, Electra Investment Trust PLC and Electra
    Associates, Inc. (collectively, "Electra"), by and through their
    undersigned counsel, submit this response in opposition to the
    motion of the Special Litigation Committee (the "SLC") for an
    Order approving a partial settlement of this action (the
    "Motion" 1 .
                    For the reasons set forth below, the SLC's motion
    should be denied.            The Motion--the SLC's third attempt to compel
    plaintiffs to accept an inadequate settlement in this action--
    suffers from many of the same defects that burdened the SLC's
    
    
    
    MRY-04-1999  IO:16           WFG 43-139  43FRX2              05971100820    P.O3/13
    
        0596528.01
    
    
        prior two motions to approve an earlier proposed settlement,
       which the Court previously denied. Nothing has changed since the
        Court's earlier two decisions that should dictate a different
        result now.         The SLC's piecemeal submiseion of its earlier
        proposed settlement as a partial settlement should again be
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC,
  • Plaintiffs, Electra Investment Trust PLC and Electra
  • Associates, Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel, submit this response in
  • prior two motions to approve an earlier proposed settlement,
  • In a letter opinion, dated February 24, 1999, the Court denied the SLC's motion, holding that
  • before the Court could approve the new partial settlement proposed by the SLC, it would need
  • On March 3, 1999, the SLC filed a motion for reargument of the Court's decision denying the
  • At or about the same time, the individual defendants also moved for a stay of all discovery
  • the Court also denied the request of the SLC and the individual defendants for a further stay
  • Although not entirely clear from its motion papers, the SLC apparently is requesting that the
  • Crews will apparently execute a note to TBC in the aggregate principal
  • amount of $325,000 ' and a second note, bearing interest at 8%, representing a portion of his
  • For example, according to the SLC's motion, "Crews would execute and deliver to TBC two
  • initial argument regarding the offer of xiotes to settle the misappropriation claims fails
  • TBC's financial condition and need for cash, a settlement providing no immediate repayment
  • the SLCls willingness to settle certain of plaintiffs' claims in exchange for Crews merely
  • SK conducted an adequate investigation of the claim against Crews for using TBC funds for
  • Plaintiffs also served a subpoena on WH Smith of California, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary

  • 6 . ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    CREWS
    HONORE
    RYAN
    MOTION
    HILL
    FACTS
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    COURT
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    ADVANCEMENTS
    DEL
    DELAWARE
    TBC
    DIRECTORS
    AFFIDAVIT
    LITIGATION
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    UNDERTAKING
    SUFFER IRREPARABLE HARM
    SETTLEMENT
    KORDYBACK
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    SLC
    COMMON STOCK
    BOARD MEMBERS
    BALLOU AFF
    NET WORTH
    AUTHORITIES
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
     ELECTRA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC and               >
     ELECTRA ASSOCIATES, INC.,                      >>
                           Plaintiffs,              >>
              V.                                     ) Civil Action No.  1,5890-NC   i
    
     ROBERT B. CREWS, JR., DEBORAH L.M.
     HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN, and ROBERT C.
     HILL, JR.,
                                                                                    ,-`r
                           Defendants,                                             c.: ..a
                                                                                   . "
                                                                                   C...rY
              -and-                                                                -3
    
    
     THE BENJAMIN COMPANY, INC.,
    
                           Nominal Defendant.
    
    
                       DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWERING BRIEF
                            IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS'
                       MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
    
    
    
                                                 Stephen E. Herrmann
                                                 Russell C. Silberglied
                                                 Richards, Layton & Finger
                                                 One Rodney Square
                                                 P.O. Box 551
                                                 Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                 (302) 651-7730
                                                   Attorneys for Defendants Robert B.
                                                   Crews, Jr., Deborah L.M. Honore,
                                                   Patricia Ryan, and Robert C. Hill,
                                                   Jr.
    Dated: May 4, 1999
    
    
    
    RLFl-2005615-1
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • ROBERT B. CREWS, JR., DEBORAH L.M. HONORE, PATRICIA RYAN, and ROBERT C. HILL, JR.,
  • MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • OF FACTS
  • DEFENDANTS WILL SUFFER IRREPARABLE HARM IF THE APPLICATION
  • Of The Directors.
  • PLAINTIFFS WILL NOT BE IRREPARABLY HARMED SHOULD THE COMPANY ADVANCE FUNDS TO DEFENDANTS.
  • -i-TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
  • Inc., Del.
  •    |