LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BARRY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v GENERAL HOUSEWARES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,202, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BARRY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017202, Stockholders, Relief, Adequate, Bricker, Breaching, Common, Directors, Damages, Committing, Richard, Lundin, Ann, Manix, Phillip, Ranney, Alleges, Companyi, Executive Offices, Specialty, Holders, Proper, Act, Manner, Enjoining , ContentID: 120240833

Case Documents
1 1999-06 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101931
6 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
MEMBERS
STOCKHOLDERS
LAW
RELIEF
COUNSEL
ADEQUATE
BRICKER
BREACHING
COURT
COMMON
DIRECTORS
DAMAGES
COMMITTING
RICHARD
LUNDIN
ANN
MANIX
PHILLIP
RANNEY
ALLEGES
COMPANYI
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
SPECIALTY
HOLDERS
PROPER
ACT
MANNER
ENJOINING
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
--------------------------------------------~~                                       . .i
 The Barry Family Limited
 Partnership of California,

                        Plaintiff,
                                                                                 `,I:.       ::- 1
                        V.                                   CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT: :-;           
                                                                                 _-i1:       k3
 GENERAL HOUSEWARES CORP., PAUL                                                  b 1 '_       * *
                                                                                 -J< I' :
                                                                                 --.         N
 A. SAXTON, CHARLES E. BRADLEY,                                                       Al -
                                                                                      -;:
 JOHN S. CROWLEY, THOMAS L.
 FRANCIS, JOSEPH HINSEY IV,
 RICHARD E. LUNDIN, ANN MANIX and
 PHILLIP A. RANNEY,
                        Defendants.                    II
-----.---------------------------------------- A

        Plaintiff, by its attorneys, alleges upon information and

 belief, except as to paragraph 1 which Plaintiff alleges upon

 knowledge, as follows:

                                           PARTIES

            1.          Plaintiff The Barry Family Limited Partnership of

    California is a stockholder of defendant General Housewares

    Corp. (llGeneralll or "the CompanyI'), and has been at all times
    relevant hereto.

           2.           General is a corporation duly organized and

    existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its

    principal executive offices located at 1536 Beech Street, Terre

    Haute, Indiana.           General manufactures and markets cookware such

    as top-of-stove, oven and specialty cookware, kitchen cutlery,



SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff, by its attorneys, alleges upon information and
  • except as to paragraph 1 which Plaintiff alleges upon
  • Corp. (llGeneralll or "the CompanyI'), and has been at all times relevant hereto.
  • principal executive offices located at 1536 Beech Street,
  • as top-of-stove, oven and specialty cookware, kitchen cutlery,
  • shares of General common stock issued and outstanding.
  • record holders hold as nominees for a much larger group of
  • Thomas L. Francis, Joseph Hinsey IV, Richard E. Lundin, Ann
  • Manix and Phillip A. Ranney are directors of General.
  • responsibility to Plaintiff and the other public stockholders of
  • from the Class are defendants herein and any person, firm,
  • There are questions of law and fact which are
  • Plaintiff and the other members of the Class would be irreparably
  • damaged if the defendants are not enjoined from committing the
  • The defendants have acted or refused to act on
  • action and has retained competent counsel experienced in litigation
  • Plaintiff is an adequate representative of the Class and will
  • CLAIM FOR RELIEF
  • Bricker said General received the buyout
  • Defendants have breached and are breaching their
  • 1999 acquisition proposal in a timely and diligent manner.
  • Preliminarily and permanently enjoining the
  • Awarding the Class compensatory damages against
  • Court may seem just and proper.
  •    |