LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK v OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,234, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017234, Omnipoint, Paragraph, Averments, Audio Jam, Truth, Comcast, Information Sufficient, Cellular, Denies, Tri-state, County, Verified Amended Complaint, Cellular Telephone Company, Delaware, Agency Agreement, Agreement, Wilmington Cellular, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Preliminary Injunction, Defendant Omnipoint Communications, Document Speaks, Sufficient Information, Philadelphia, Falsity, Ver, Compl, Communications Services, Purport, Del, Agents, Plaintiff American Cellular, Comcast Metrophone , ContentID: 120240818

Case Documents
1 1999-08-17 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT AUDIO JAM CORP. TO VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101902
16 pages
PDF
2 1999-08-17 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SOUND OF TRI-STATE TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101901
14 pages
PDF
3 1999-08-12 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TO VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101903
18 pages
PDF
4 1999-06-15 PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIM. INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102837
28 pages
PDF
5 1999-06-15 V. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES LLC VERIFIED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101904
16 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 92 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ANSWER OF DEFENDANT AUDIO JAM CORP. TO VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PARAGRAPH
AVERMENTS
DENIES
INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
TRUTH
VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT
AGREEMENT
DEFENDANT AUDIO JAM
COURT
DOCUMENT SPEAKS
PLAINTIFFS
EXHIBIT
COMCAST
RELIEF
PARAGRAPHS SET
OMNIPOINT
AUDIO JAM CORPORATION
DIGITAL AGENCY ADDENDUM
TRI-STATE
WHEREFORE
JAM RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS
AWARDED COSTS
ATTORNEYS
AUDIO JAM INCORPORATES
PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS SET
GOVERNORS SQUARE
SQUARE LOCATION
CHANCERY
COMCAST METROPHONE
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK                              ..
CORP., d aJ.,                                          .... Civil Action No. 17234 (SPL)
                               Plaintiffs,             ....
                       V .                             ..
                                                       .
OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS                               ..
SERVICES, LLC, & al.,                                  ....
                                Defendants. :                                           " .
                                                                                        .  1


            ANSWER OF DEFENDANT AUDIO JAM CORPORATION                                   -a --
                       TO  VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT                                    .

                 Defendant Audio Jam Corporation ("Audio Jam"), by an through its

counsel, hereby answers Plaintiffs' Verified Amended Complaint as follows:

                 1. Audio Jam is without knowledge or information sufficient to form

a  belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.

                 2. Audio Jam is without knowledge or information sufficient to form

a belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.

                 3. Audio Jam is without knowledge or information sufficient to form

a belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.

                 4. Audio Jam is without knowledge or information sufficient to form

a belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.

                 5. Audio Jam i:s without knowledge or information sufficient to form

a belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.



               6.      Audio Jam is without knowledge or information sufficient to form

a belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.

               7.      Audio Jam is without knowledge or information sufficient to form

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Defendant Audio Jam Corporation,
  • hereby answers Plaintiffs' Verified Amended Complaint as follows:
  • Audio Jam is without knowledge or information sufficient to form
  • a belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.
  • Admitted that Comcast entered into an agreement with Audio Jam.
  • Admitted that Comcast Metrophone and Cell South apparently
  • entered into an agreement with Tri-State,
  • document speaks for itself.
  • a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit E to the Verified
  • Comcast by entering into commercial relationships with Omnipoint.
  • competing services from Audio Jam's Governors Square location.
  • Admitted that Mr. Mahoney visited Audio Jam's Governors Square
  • Audio Jam incorporates herein all of the preceding paragraphs set
  • WHEREFORE, defendant Audio Jam respectfully requests that the
  • it be awarded costs, attorneys' fees, and such other relief as this Court deems equitable,
  • the services of Comcast in the releva.nt area and, therefore, plaintiffs fail to state a claim

  • 2 . ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SOUND OF TRI-STATE TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    AVERMENTS
    DEFENDANT
    SUFFICIENT INFORMATION
    TRUTH
    FALSITY
    TRI-STATE
    AGREEMENT
    PURPORT
    SPEAKS
    COMCAST
    PLAINTIFFS
    LAW
    ADDENDUM
    OMNIPOINT
    WILMINGTON
    REFERENCE
    RESPONSE
    DELAWARE
    CELLULAR
    SOUND
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    TRI-STATE INCORPORATES
    COMCAST METROPHONE
    CELL SOUTH
    DIGITAL AGENCY ADDENDUM
    PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS
    SUFFER
    ESQUIRE
    COURT
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK CORP., :
    et al.,                                 .
                             Plaintiffs     :.
                                  V. : C.A. No.          17234(SPL)
                                            ..
    OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, :
    LLC, SOUND OF TRI-STATE, INC.,
    AUDIO JAM CORPORATION and U.S. PAGE:.                              .,
                             Defendants :
    
    
                    ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SOUND OF TRI-STATE INC.
                             TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
               1. Defendant is without sufficient information to form a
    
    belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
    
    paragraph.
    
               2. Defendant is without sufficient information to form a
    
    belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
    
    paragraph.
    
               3. Defendant is without sufficient information to form a
    
    belief as to -the truth or falsity of the averments  in this
    
    paragraph.
    
               4. Defendant is without sufficient information to form a
    
    belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
    
    paragraph.
    
               5. Defendant is without sufficient information to form a
    
    
    
    belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
    
    paragraph.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES,:
  • ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SOUND OF TRI-STATE INC.
  • TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • Defendant is without sufficient information to form a
  • belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
  • paragraph.
  • Admitted only that Comcast has signed an agreement with
  • Admitted only that Comcast Metrophone and Cell South
  • The remaining averments of this paragraph which purport to
  • Wilmington Cellular and Delaware KSA signed an agreement with Tri-State which agreement
  • Comcast Metrophone and Cell South signed the agreement with Tri-State which agreement speaks
  • Digital Agency Addendum on or about October 8, 1997, which document
  • Digital Agency Addendum on or about October 8,
  • Defendant Tri-State incorporates by reference the
  • preceding paragraphs of its answer.
  • Sets forth a conclusion of law to which no response
  • The Plaintiffs have suffered and will suffer no injury as
  • WilXam R. Denny, Esquire

  • 3 . ANSWER OF DEFENDANT OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TO VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARAGRAPH
    OMNIPOINT
    TRUTH
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    DEFENDANT OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
    PLAINTIFFS
    VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT
    AGREEMENT
    CELLULAR
    COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
    COURT
    DOCUMENT SPEAKS
    DELAWARE
    PURPORT
    COMCAST
    TRI-STATE
    AUDIO JAM
    DIGITAL AGENCY ADDENDUM
    WILMINGTON CELLULAR
    PARAGRAPH SETS
    WHEREFORE
    RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS
    AWARDED COSTS
    ATTORNEYS
    CASTLE COUNTY
    UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL
    OMNIPOINT INCORPORATES
    FOREGOING PARAGRAPHS
    PURPORTED VIOLATION
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK :
    CORP., et al.,                                ea..
                            Plaintiffs,           ..
                                                                                             -         
                      v.                          6B C.A. No. 17234NC                        7     ."
    
    
    
    OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS  :
    SERVICES, L.L.C., et al.,                     *aa                                        i  .?
                                                  0                                          ?.
                            Defendants. :
    
    
                 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
                      SERVICES, L.L.C. TO VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
                      Defendant Ornnipoint Communications Services, L.L.C. 4" Omnipoint"), by and
    
    through its undersigned counsel, hereby answers Plaintiffs' Verified Amended Complaint as
    
    follows:
    
                      I. Omnipoint is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
    
    as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and they are denied accordingly.
    
                      2. Omnipoint is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
    
    as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and they are denied accordingly.
    
                      -32 a Omnipoint is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
    
    as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and they are denied accordingly.
    
                      4. Omnipoint is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
    
    as to the truth of the averme:nts of this paragraph, and they are denied accordingly.
    
    
    
                   5.      Omnipoint is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
    
    as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph, and they are denied accordingly.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • ANSWER OF DEFENDANT OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
  • through its undersigned counsel, hereby answers Plaintiffs' Verified Amended Complaint as
  • Omnipoint is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
  • as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph,
  • `Tri-State, Inc. has a place of business at the Tri-State Mall in Claymont, Delaware.
  • Admitted only that defendant Audio Jam
  • Admitted only that Comcast Metrophone
  • and Cell South evidently signed an agreement with Tri-State which agreement speaks for itself.
  • The remaining averments of this paragraph, which purport to characterize the agreement, are
  • Admitted only that Wilmington Cellular
  • purported violation of the Agreement by Comcast as required by Section 9 of the First
  • .fri-State apparently signed a document entitled "`Digital Agency Addendum" on or about
  • October 8, 1997, which document speaks for itself: The remaining averments of this paragraph,
  • Omnipoint incorporates paragraphs I. through 59 of its Answer as if set
  • Omnipoint is aware that some of the plaintiffs h.ave evidently signed agreements with
  • WHEREFORE, defendant Omnipoint Communications Services, L.L.C.
  • entered in its favor, and that it be awarded costs, attorneys' fees, and such other relief as
  • Omnipoint incorporates all of the foregoing paragraphs of its Answer as if
  • respectfully requests that the Verified Amended Complaint be dismissed,
  • This paragraph sets forth a conclusion of law to which no

  • 4 . PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIM. INJUNCTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CELLULAR
    COUNTY
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    AUDIO JAM
    COMCAST
    PLAINTIFFS
    AGENCY AGREEMENT
    TRI-STATE
    PHILADELPHIA
    VER
    COMPL
    DEL
    AGENTS
    COMMUNICATIONS
    SQUARE
    COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    CASTLE COUNTY
    TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE
    CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY
    CELLULAR NETWORK
    RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
    EXCLUSIVELV
    AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK
    LEXIS
    WILMINGTON CELLULAR
    BUSINESS RELATIONS
    CMRS
    PENNSYLVANIA
    
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                       
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK
     CORP., et al.,
    
                                    Plaintiffs,
                                                           .                       I
                                                           .
                   vs.                                     :         C.A. No.           /    ..-...
                                                                                             C' I
    OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
     SERVICES, LLC,
    
                                    Defendant.
    
    
                           PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                          THEIR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
    
    
    
    
                                                   Henry E. Gallagher, Jr.
                                                   Samuel D. Brickley II
                                                   Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz
                                                   1220 Market Street
                                                   P.O. Box 2207
                                                   Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                   (302) 658-9141
    
                                                   Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Of Counsel:
    
    William B. Petersen
    Edmond J. Ghisu
    Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin
    One Logan Square, 12th Floor
    Philadelphia, PA 19 103
    (215) 568-6200
    
    Dated: June 15, 1999
    
    
    
                                                       TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LLC,
  • PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
  • THEIR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin One Logan Square,
  • The Tri-State Agency Agreements and Digital Addendum
  • The Audio Jam Agency Agreement and Digital Addendum
  • Omnipoint Enters into Commercial Relationships with T&State,
  • Corncast's Suit Against Omnipoint In Philadelphia
  • American Cellular Network Corn.
  • No. 15996,1997 Del.
  • LEXIS 175 at "12, Jacobs,V.C.

  • 5 . V. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES LLC VERIFIED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMCAST
    CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY
    DELAWARE
    JERSEY
    COUNTY
    PENNSYLVANIA
    WILMINGTON CELLULAR
    AGENCY AGREEMENT
    AUDIO JAM
    PLAINTIFF AMERICAN CELLULAR
    TRI-STATE
    EAST SWEDESFORD ROAD
    WAYNE
    CELL SOUTH
    DELAWARE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
    COMCAST METROPHONE
    METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA
    OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
    OCEAN COUNTY
    LLC
    COMCAST PCS
    C-SW CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP
    WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
    COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIP
    AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK
    DIGITAL ADDENDUM
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
    CMRS
    BUSINESS RELATIONS
    
     81 IP                                                                              m-,' r (f- y
                                                                                        $ ! i i, 1 \,
    r5                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
              AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK CORP., :
              CELL SOUTH OF NEW JERSEY, INC.,                       :
              VINELAND CELLULAR TELEPHONE                           :
              COMPANY, INC., COMCAST PCS                            .B
              COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AMCELL OF                       :
              ATLANTIC CITY, INC., OCEAN COUNTY                     :
              CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, NEW :
              BRUNSWICK CELLULAR TELEPHONE                          :
              COMPANY, LONG BRANCH CELLULAR                         :       Civil Action No. flA3hC
              TELEPHONE COMPANY, and C-SW                           0.
              CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP,                                 ..:
                                             Plaintiffs,            0a..
                                     vs.                            ...
              OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
               SERVICES, LLC,
    
                                              Defendant.
    
    
    
                                                  VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
    
                             Plaintiffs American Cellular Network Corp., Cell SouthofNew  Jersey, Inc.,
    
              Cellular Telephone Company, Inc., Comcast PCS Communications, Inc., Amcell of Atlantic
    
              Inc., Ocean County Cellular Telephone Company, New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Company,
    
              Long Branch Cellular Telephone Company and C-SW Cellular Partnership (collectively,
    
              "Corncast"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and for their Complaint in this
    
              state as follows:
    
    
    
                                               PARTIES
    
                  1.       Plaintiff American Cellular Network Corp. ("Amcell") is a New Jersey
    
    corporation with offices at 480 East Swedesford Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087. Amcell is the
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, NEW:
  • OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LLC,
  • Plaintiffs American Cellular Network Corp., Cell SouthofNew Jersey, Inc., Vineland
  • Inc., Ocean County Cellular Telephone Company, New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Company,
  • Long Branch Cellular Telephone Company and C-SW Cellular Partnership (collectively,
  • Plaintiff American Cellular Network Corp. is a New Jersey
  • corporation with offices at 480 East Swedesford Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087.
  • assignee of the assets of AWACS, Inc., d/b/a Comcast Metrophone.
  • Amcell is also the surviving partner of Wilmington Cellular Telephone Company,
  • a dissolved Delaware general partnership.
  • Plaintiff Cell South of New Jersey, Inc. is a New Jersey
  • Plaintiff Comcast PCS Communications,
  • Brunswick") is a Delaware general partnership with offices at 480 East Swedesford Road, Wayne,
  • Defendant Omnipoint is also in the business ofproviding CMRS to customers
  • Comcast has entered into agreements with Sound of Tri-State, Inc., Audio Jam, Inc. and U.S.
  • The Tri-State Agencv Aweements and Dbital Addendum
  • Agency Agreement with Tri-State,
  • CMRS in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Metropolitan Statistical Area and the Trenton, New
  • neither AGENT nor any person, firm, corporation or other entity affiliated with, owned in sell Service on behalf of any other carrier of Service or other similar wireless voice ications service or any Reseller or representative of such carrier; share commissions with any
  • neither AGENT nor any person, firm, corporation or other entity affiliated with, owned in
  • "T&State Digital Addendum") with Comcast whereby the terms of the First Tri-State Agency
  • in writing that Omnipoint "is involved in a commercial relationship" with Tri-State.
  • Tortious Interference With Contract and Business Relations
  •    |