LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SCHIRY v DE VINK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,534, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: SCHIRY, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017534, Warner-lambert, Ahp, Merger, Stockholders, Stock, Laws, Directors, Individual Defendants, Common, Adequate, Breach, Fiduciary Duties, Damages, Enjoining, Reasons, Market Price, Fee, Shareholder, Account, Relief, Defendant William, Pharmacueticals, Protect, Officer, George, Proper , ContentID: 120240663

Case Documents
1 1999-11 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101656
6 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT
AHP
PLAINTIFF
MERGER
MEMBERS
STOCKHOLDERS
STOCK
LAWS
DIRECTORS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
COMMON
ADEQUATE
BREACH
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
DAMAGES
ENJOINING
REASONS
MARKET PRICE
FEE
SHAREHOLDER
ACCOUNT
RELIEF
DEFENDANT WILLIAM
PHARMACUETICALS
PROTECT
COURT
OFFICER
GEORGE
PROPER
                    $4   '                   \,,     !
                                             i
                                     ,/,      ,-I
     ,  L                      ,*

             .'           ,

                    /'
\                                                         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF
                                                                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

                          ---------------------------------------------~---------------x
                               SAL SCHIRY,                                                         

                                                                   Plaintiff,
                                                                                                   
                                                  -against-

                               LODEWIJK J. R. DE VINK,  GEORGE
                          A. LORCH, ROBERT N. BURT, ALEX
                          J. MANDL, MICHAEL I. SOVERN,
                          WILLIAM H. GRAY, III, LASALLE
                               D. LEFFALL, JR., DONALD C.
                               CLARK, JOHN A. GEORGES, WILLIAM
                               R. HOWELL, WARNER-LAMBERT
                          COMPANY and AMERICAN HOME
                               PRODUCTS CORPORATION,

                                                                   Defendants.
                          --------------------------------------------------------------x

                                                            Plaintiff alleges upon information and

                               plaintiff alleges upon knowledge, as follows:

                                                            1.     Plaintiff is a stockholder of

                               ("Warner-Lambert" or the "Company") and has been continuously since

                          wrongs complained of herein.

                                                            2.    Warner-Lambert is a corporation

                          the laws of the state of Delaware. Warner-Lambert discovers, develops,

                               and markets pharmaceutical, consumer health care, and confectionery

                               Company's products include Listerine mouthwash, Trident chewing gum,

SNIPPETS:
  • corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware.
  • generic pharmacueticals, nutritionals, animal biologicals and pharmacueticals, and crop
  • Defendant Lodewijk J.R. de Vink is the President and Chief
  • Executive Officer of Warner-Lambert and Chairman of its Board of Directors.
  • Defendant George A. Larch is a Director of Warner-Lambert.
  • Defendant William H. Gray, III is a Director of Warner-Lambert.
  • The individual defendants, as officers and/or directors of Warner-Lambert, have a fiduciary
  • stockholders of Warner-Lambert or their successors in interest,
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the
  • whether the individual defendants have breached their fiduciary duties
  • Accordingly, plaintiff is an adequate
  • representative of the Class and vvill fairly and adequately protect the interests of the
  • On November 4, 1999, VVarner-Lambert and AHP announced that
  • they had signed a definitive merger agreement for the merger of the two
  • exchanging 1.4919 shares of AHP stock for each share of Warner-Lambert stock.
  • exchange ratio is wholly inadequate for several reasons including the absence of any
  • premium over the market price of Warner-Lambert stock.
  • The Merger also provides for a termination fee of $2 billion payable
  • shareholder value by conducting an auction of the Company or seeking other alternatives
  • Unless enjoined by this Court,
  • to breach their fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the other members of the Class
  • plaintiff prays for judgment and relief as follows:
  • Declaring this to be a proper class action;
  • Enjoining, preliminarily and permanently, the Merger complained of herein;
  • Directing that defendants account to plaintiff and the Class for all damages
  •    |