LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BRICKELL PARTNERS v BURT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,541, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BRICKELL PARTNERS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017541, Warner, Pfizer, Warner Lambert, Stockholders, Agreement, Ahp, Breach, Duties, William, Proper, Officer, Georges, Common, Chief, Market, Lipitor, Analyst, Transaction, Failing, Adequate, Care, Chairman, Vink, Defendants Owe , ContentID: 120240656

Case Documents
1 1999-11 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101647
9 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 9 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WARNER
PFIZER
PLAINTIFF
WARNER LAMBERT
STOCKHOLDERS
MEMBERS
AGREEMENT
AHP
BREACH
DUTIES
WILLIAM
PROPER
OFFICER
GEORGES
COMMON
CHIEF
LAW
COUNSEL
BUSINESS
MARKET
LIPITOR
ANALYST
TRANSACTION
FAILING
ADEQUATE
CARE
CHAIRMAN
VINK
DEFENDANTS OWE
                 (j  !,J
          `6        J              fj, /
                         j.  -f  >
t                   :  -'  :,i*
i    pl;t,  a               `v'
     i                                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                             ------------------------ X
                   BRICKELL PARTNERS,                                        C. A. No.
                                                        Plaintiff,

                                   - against  -

                   ROBERT N. BURT, DONALD C. CLARK,                     :
                   LODEWIJK J.R. DE VINK, JOHN A.                            CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                   GEORGES, WILLIAM H. GRAY III,
                   WILLIAM R. HOWELL, LASALLE D.
                   LEFFALL, JR., M.D., GEORGE A.
                   LORCH, ALEX J. MANDL, MICHAEL
                   I. SOVERN, PATRICIA S. LONGE,
                   MELVIN R.  GOODES, LAWRENCE G.
                   RAWL, and WARNER-LAMBERT
                   COMPANY,

                                                        Defendants.
                                                       ---------------- i


                                            Plaintiff, on knowledge as to its own acts and upon

                   information and belief as to all other matters, alleges as follows:

                                                          NATURE OF THE ACTION

                                            1.     This is a class action brought on behalf of the

                   public stockholders of Warner-Lambert Company ("Warner Lambert" or

                   the "Company") who have been, and continue to be, deprived of the

                   opportunity to realize fully the benefits of their investment in

                   the Company.                   The individual defendants have wrongfully refused

                   take the steps necessary to maximize stockholder value, by entering

                   into a transaction with American Home Products Corporation ("AH,")
                   and failing to properly consider a bona fide offer for the Company

SNIPPETS:
  • WILLIAM R. HOWELL, LASALLE D.
  • and failing to properly consider a bona fide offer for the Company
  • from Pfizer, Inc. that exceeds AHP's offer by over $12
  • defendants have breached
  • their fiduciary duties to plaintiff and the class.
  • Plaintiff Brickell Partners,
  • of Warner Lambert common stock.
  • shaving, pet care) and confectionary products (chewing gums, breath
  • Defendant Melvin S. Goodes is the Chairman
  • Defendant Lodewijk R. De Vink is a
  • Chief Operating Officer of the Company.
  • Defendant John A. Georges is a director
  • on behalf of all stockholders of the Company
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members
  • There are questions of law and fact common to the
  • has retained competent counsel experienced in litigation of this
  • share in a transaction valued at $72 billion (the "AHP Agreement").
  • Pursuant to the AHP Agreement, defendant De Vink, Warner Lambert's
  • weeks about a "business combination" but that it had been prevented
  • the cholesterol drug Lipitor.
  • continuing to breach,
  • an analyst at Brown Brothers
  • Defendants owe fundamental fiduciary obligations to
  • procedures or other mechanisms for checking the market to assure
  • Plaintiff and the Class have no adequate remedy of
  • be just and proper.
  •    |