LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

STEPAK v DE VINK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,566, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: STEPAK, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017566, Warner-lambert, Ahp, Merger, Stock, Common Stock, Stockholders, Complaineld, Pharmaceuticals, Directors, Fiduciary Duties, Individual Defendants, Adequate, Relief, Breach, Damages, Enjoining, Reasons, Market, Fee, Shareholder, Account, Georges, William, Consumer Health, Care, Protect , ContentID: 120240635

Case Documents
1 1999-11-09 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101623
6 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT
PLAINTIFF
AHP
MERGER
MEMBERS
STOCK
LAW
COMMON STOCK
STOCKHOLDERS
COMPLAINELD
PHARMACEUTICALS
DIRECTORS
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
ADEQUATE
RELIEF
BREACH
DAMAGES
ENJOINING
REASONS
MARKET
FEE
SHAREHOLDER
ACCOUNT
GEORGES
WILLIAM
CONSUMER HEALTH
CARE
PROTECT
                                           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                        IN AND FOR

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .X
BARNETT STEPAK
                     C.A. No.    /
                                                                                          

                     CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                             -against-

LODIEWIJK J.R. DE VINK, GEORGE
                                      ,_
A. LORCH, ROBERT N. BURT, ALEX
J. MANDL, MICHAEL I. SOVERN,
WILL.IAM  I-l. GRAY, III, LASALLE
D. LE:FFALL,  JR, DONALD C.
CLARK, JOHN A. GEORGES, WILLIAM
R. HOWELL, WARNER-LAMBERT
CONiPANY and AMERICAN HOME
                                 ;.
PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

                                                                    Defendants.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .X
                                             Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief, except

plaintiff alleges upon knowledge, as follows:

                                             1.                     Plaintiff is a stockholder of

("Warner-Lambert" or the "Company") and has been continuously since prior to the wrongs

complaineld of herein. He owns 8,237.96 shares of the company stock.

                                             2.                    Warner-Lambet-t is a corporation

laws of the state of Delaware. Warner-Lambet-t discovers, develops, manufactures, and

markets pharmaceutical, consumer health care, and confectionery products. The Company's

products included Listerine mouthwash, Trident chewing gum, Schick razors, Tetra fish food,

Sudafet  decongestant, Lubriderm body bar, Dilantin epilepsy drug, Centrax tranquilizer,

Neosporin topical antibiotic, and other products.
                There are over 854 million share of
SNIPPETS:
  • complaineld of herein.
  • He owns 8,237.96 shares of the company stock.
  • markets pharmaceutical, consumer health care, and confectionery products.
  • Warner-Laimbert common stock outstanding.
  • discovers, develops, manufactures, distributes and sells pharmaceuticals, consumer health
  • Defendant Lodewijk J.R. de Vink is the President and Chief Executive
  • Officer of \Narner-Lambert and Chairman of its Board of Directors.
  • Defendant George A. Larch is a Director of Warner-Lambert.
  • Defendant William H. Gray, III is a Director of Warner-Lambert.
  • Defendant John A Georges is a Director of Warner-Lambert.
  • have a fiduciary relationship and responsibility to plaintiff and the other public
  • stockholders of Warner-Lambert or their successors in interest, who are being and will be
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the
  • whether the individual defendants have breached their fiduciary duties owed
  • On November 4, 1999, Warner-Lambert and AHP announced that they
  • had signed a definitive merger agreement for the merger of the two companies.
  • inadequate for several reasons including the absence of any premium over the market of
  • The Merger also provides for a termination fee of $2 billion payable to
  • consideration to the Company's recent operating results, the recent market price of the
  • shareholder value by conducting an auction of the Company or seeking other alternatives to
  • acquisition of Warner-Lambert by other companies or conducting an adequate market check)
  • and have otherwise failed to take other steps to protect the interests of the class.
  • breach their fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the other members of the Class aided and
  • wrongs complained of and would be unjustly enriched absent relief in this action.
  • Enjoining, preliminarily and permanently, the Merger complained of herein;
  • Directing the defendants account to plaintiff and the Class for all damages
  •    |