LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,568, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: DRESDNER, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017568, Paxson, Shareholders, Pax, Directors, Allegations, Nbc Transaction, Nbc, Allege, Complaint, Del, Delaware, Facts, Control, Voting Power, York, Lowell, Shares, Stock, Common Stock, Demand, Plaintiffs Allege, Exercise, Agreement, Public Shareholders, Injury, Revlon, Individual Defendants, Shareholders Litigation, Stockholders, Fails, Stockholder, Business Judgment, Transaction, Aronson, Conclusory Allegations, Motion, Second Prong, Milberg Weiss Bershad, Lerach Llp, Supr, Chancery, Transactions , ContentID: 120240633

Case Documents
1 2001-07-10 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126788
25 pages
PDF
2 2001-03-15 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115512
20 pages
PDF
3 2000-09-22 PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102672
20 pages
PDF
4 2000-05-02 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102673
25 pages
PDF
5 1999-11 CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101620
17 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 107 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PAX
SHAREHOLDERS
PAXSON
DEFENDANTS
COURT
NBC
STOCK
DELAWARE
DEL
CHANCERY
YORK
TRANSACTIONS
SHARES
CHANCELLOR
CONTROL
AGREEMENT
DIRECTORS
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COMMUNICATIONS
STOCKHOLDER
DIRECT CLAIM
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
ALLEGATION
LERACH LLP
VOTING POWER
CONTROLLING
COMPLAINT
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


                                          )
IN RE PAXSON  COMMUNI-                    >        CONSOLIDATED CIVIL
CATION CORPORATION                        >           ACTION NO. 17568
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION  )



                        MEMORANDUM OPINION

                        Date Submitted: April 25, 200l
                             Date Decided: July 10, 2001


Joseph A. Rosenthal, Jr., of ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS  &
GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: Kenneth J.
Vianale and Robert R. Adler, of MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES &
LERACH  LLP,  Boca  -Raton, Florida; MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
HYNES  & LERACH LLP, New York, New York; STULL, STULL  &
BRODY, New York, New York; LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO,
LLP, New York, New York; WEISS  &  YOURMAN,  New York, New York;
Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Kenneth J. Nachbar and James G. McMillan, III, of MORRIS, NICHOLS,
ARSHT  & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: Tracy
Nichols, of HOLLAND  & KNIGHT LLP, Miami, Florida; Attorneys for
Defendants.





CHANDLER, Chancellor



        This action arises out of the alleged rejection of a cash offer for

Paxson Communications Corporation ("Pax" or the "Company") from Fox

Network ("Fox") and the later acceptance by Pax of a series of agreements

(the "NBC Transactions") with the National Broadcasting Company, Inc.

("NBC"). The plaintiffs allege that Fox made an all cash offer of $20 per
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION)
  • Joseph A. Rosenthal, Jr., of ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware;
  • Kenneth J. Nachbar and James G. McMillan, III, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL,
  • CHANDLER, Chancellor
  • Paxson Communications Corporation from Fox
  • The plaintiffs allege that Fox made an all cash offer of $20 per
  • by the directors and/or senior officers of Pax.* Shortly after the alleged Fox
  • NBC invested $415 million in Pax in exchange for convertible
  • preferred stock, certain warrants, and the right to purchase certain shares
  • owned by Pax's controlling stockholder,
  • Plaintiffs first assert a direct claim,
  • Individual Defendants' purported violations of their fiduciary duties ("Claim
  • Class A shares possess one vote per share.
  • the time of the challenged NBC Transactions.
  • approximately 75% of Pax's voting power.
  • These three agreements included an investment agreement (the "Investment
  • stockholder agreement.
  • approximately 49% of the equity in Pax and control almost 70% of its voting
  • Path Communications Corp., Del.
  • characterization of the claim in the complaint, but rather must look to "the
  • good faith.`45 Nothing even close to such an allegation has been made here.
  • in this memorandum opinion.

  • 2 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DIRECTORS
    DEMAND
    CONTROL
    PLAINTIFFS ALLEGE
    PAXSON
    COURT
    VOTING POWER
    ALLEGATIONS
    REVLON
    FACTS
    NBC
    DEFENDANTS
    TRANSACTION
    SHARES
    DEL
    SHAREHOLDER
    STOCKHOLDER
    MERCANTILE STORES
    CONCLUSORY ALLEGATIONS
    GREENWALD
    CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDER
    CITATIONS
    PLAINTIFFS ARGUE
    COMPLAINT
    MAJORITY SHAREHOLDER
    ENTRENCHMENT
    INVESTMENT
    THIRD PARTY
    DATANOINT CORN
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    
    IN RE PAXSON  COMMUNICATIONS                          C O N S O L I D A T E D   ::-'  `-.
    CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS                              C.A.No.      17568-NC       ,'             :
    LITIGATION                                                                                         
                                                                                             (L ,
                                                                                 I
    
    
    
    
                              REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                            DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
                                        MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
                                        Kenneth J. Nachbar
                                        James G. McMillan, III
                                        1201 N. Market Street
                                        P.O. Box 1347
                                        Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
                                        (302) 658-9200
                                           Attorneys for Defendants
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    HOLLAND  & KNIGHT LLP
    Tracy Nichols
    70 1 Brickell Avenue
    P. 0. Box 015441
    Miami, FL 33101
    (305) 374-8500
    
    
    March 15, 2001
    
    
    
                                                                                    1.
    
    
                                   TABLE OF CONTIm
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • TABLE OF CITATIONS
  • Plaintiffs' Equity And Voting Power Are Not Diluted By
  • Revlon Does Not Apply Where Control Remains In A
  • Plaintiffs' Conclusory Allegations That The Directors Are
  • Heineman v. Datanoint Corn.,
  • In re First Interstate Bancorp Consolidated Shareholder Litip.
  • The Complaint in this action challenges a transaction by which Paxson
  • Paxson's controlling stockholder, Lowell W. Paxson.
  • Plaintiffs allege that the board of directors
  • of the Company rejected a cash offer for all shares of the Company and instead accepted the
  • challenged transaction for purposes of entrenchment and in violation of their fiduciary
  • granted by Mr. Paxson to NBC.
  • As pointed out in Defendants' Opening Brief,
  • This is highly significant Mr. Paxson's investment in Paxson has a value of over $80 million
  • sell his Class B common stock - - which alone provides control of the Company - - to NBC,
  • Plaintiffs argue that they were injured in their individual capacities because their
  • Plai:ntiffs cite only Oliver v. Boston Univ., Del.
  • influence over corporate affairs" is diminished relative to that of the controlling
  • shares is a result o:f new equity issued to a third party, NBC, in the NBC Transaction, and
  • win v. Mercantile Stores
  • facts under which Revlon duties could apply.
  • ownership of Digex's majority shareholder,
  • demand nor alleged adequate reasons for failing to do so.
  • See Greenwald v. Batterson, Del.

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEL
    PAXSON
    YORK
    COURT
    FACTS
    NBC
    STOCK
    MOTION
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    DELAWARE
    SUPR
    LOWELL PAXSON
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
    DISMISS
    COMPLAINT
    MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
    NBC TRANSACTION
    LERACH LLP
    PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA
    STULL
    LAW OFFICES
    DERIVATIVE CLAIM
    AGREEMENT
    PRE-SUIT DEMAND
    DIRECTORS
    VOTING POWER
    COMMON STOCK
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                                -
    
    IN RE PAXSON  COMMUNICATIONS                     ; CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
    CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION  ) CASE NO. 17568-NC
    
    
    
                          PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
                              TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
    
                                            ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS  &
                                             GODDESS, P.A.
                                            Suite 140 1, Mellon Bank Center
                                            919 N. Market Street
                                            P.O. Box 1070
                                            (302) 656-4433
    OF COUNSEL:                             DELAWARE LIAISON COUNSEL FOR
                                            PLAINTIFFS
    MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
    HYNES  & LERACH LLP
    The Plaza, Suite 900
    5355 Town Center Road
    Boca Raton,  FL 33486
    
    
    
    One Pennsylvania Plaza
    New York, NY 10119
    
    STULL, STULL & BRODY
    6 East 45th Street
    New York, New York 10017
    
    LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO, LLP
    16 West 40th Street
    7th Floor
    New York, New York 10036
    
    WEISS & YOURMAN
    55 1 5th Avenue
    Suite 1600
    New York, NY 10 176
    
    Dated: September 22, 2000
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
  • MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP
  • One Pennsylvania Plaza New York,
  • STULL, STULL & BRODY
  • East 45th Street New York,
  • LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO,
  • OF FACTS
  • RELIEF ON BEHALF OF PAXSON'S PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
  • THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES WITH SUFFICIENT PARTICULARITY WHY A PRE-SUIT DEMAND ON PAXSON'S BOARD
  • L.P. v. Brian, Del.
  • Supr., 567 A.2d 1279.
  • In re Boston Celtics Limited Partnership Shareholders Litigation,
  • Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint' should be denied.
  • alleges that plaintiffs and the other public shareholders of Paxson Communications Corporation
  • instead, agreeing to a multi-faceted transaction with NBC, which precluded a buyout of tie
  • derivative claim on behalf of the Company,
  • 2"Individual Defendants" refers to defendants Lowell Paxson, Jeffrey Sagansky, James Em.
  • They were Paxson directors at the times relevant to this litigation.
  • The Individual Defendants instead caused Paxson to deal with NBC (the "NBlZ
  • When fully consummated, the NBC Transaction will transfer a controlling intere,:t
  • Paxson super-voting stock (Paxson Class B common stock), the opportunity to sell those shares
  • Lowell Paxson's voting power and his
  • Instead, on or about September 15, 1999, Paxson entered an investment agreement

  • 4 . OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    NBC TRANSACTION
    ALLEGATIONS
    DEFENDANTS
    ALLEGE
    COMPLAINT
    PAXSON
    SHAREHOLDERS
    EXERCISE
    INJURY
    COURT
    FAILS
    ARONSON
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DELAWARE
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    COMMON STOCK
    SECOND PRONG
    CONCLUSORY ALLEGATIONS
    INJURY DISTINCT
    VALID EXERCISE
    SUBSTANTIAL PREMIUM
    KNIGHT LLP
    DOMINATION
    PARTICULARITY
    ENTRENCHMENT
    INVESTMENT AGREEMENT
    SPECIAL INJURY
    DEMAND FUTILITY
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    IN RE PAXSON  COMMUNICATIONS           : CONSOLIDATED
    CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS               : C. A. NO. 17568-NC
    LITIGATION
    
    
    
    
                             OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                            DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                          `-
                                                                       *`.,
                                                                       :-  .
                                        MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
                                        Kenneth J. Nachbar
                                        1201 N. Market Street
                                        P.O. Box 1347
                                        Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
                                        (302) 658-9200
                                         Attorneys for Defendants
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    Holland & Knight LLP
    Tracy Nichols
    701 Brickell Avenue
    P. 0. Box 015441
    Miami, FL 33101
    (302) 3748500
    
    May 2,200O
    
    
    
                                                                                   i.
    
                                   TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Holland & Knight LLP Tracy Nichols
  • Plaintiffs Have Suffered No Injury Distinct From The
  • Count I Does Not Allege An Infringement Of Any
  • Contractual Right Held By The Shareholders Or Any Other
  • COUNT II MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT FAILS TO
  • Plaintiffs' Allegations Do Not Show That The Individual
  • Defendants Are "Interested" Under The First Prong Of The
  • Plaintiffs' Conclusory Allegations Of Domination And
  • That The NBC Transaction Was A Valid Exercise Of
  • Business Judgment Under The Second Prong Of The
  • This action arises out of the decision of the Board of Directors of Paxson
  • Essentially, Plaintiffs claim that the Individual Defendants, for entrenchment
  • purposes and in violation of their fiduciary duties to the Company and its stockholders,
  • agreements (the "NBC Transaction") by which National Broadcasting Company,
  • See Complaint l]l[2, 3, 30, 32, 33-38,42,44, 45.
  • 4 Each share of Paxson's Class B common stock entitled its holder to ten votes on all matters
  • that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties in approving the NBC
  • The principal agreement in the NBC Transaction was an Investment Agreement
  • exercise price of $12.60 per share.
  • Fox allegedly offered to purchase Paxson at the "substantial premium" of $20.00 per share.
  • of the corporation, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a direct, "special injury" apart
  • particularity" the efforts, if any, made by the plaintiff to obtain the action the plaintiff
  • Aronson v. Lewis, Del.
  • Plaintiffs' burden of pleading demand futility is significant in that courts presume
  • Here, Plaintiffs plead conclusory allegations of entrenchment, but fail to allege

  • 5 . CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PLAINTIFF
    LOWELL
    PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
    DIRECTORS
    COMMON STOCK
    NBC
    AGREEMENT
    SHARES
    PRICE
    OFFICERS
    EXPENSE
    EXERCISE PRICE
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
    SUBSTANTIAL PREMIUM
    INVESTMENT AGREEMENT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    JAMES
    GREENWALD
    DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
    PARAGRAPH
    DEFENDANT PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS
    ENJOIN WRONGFUL ACTIONS
    PREFERRED STOCK
    INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    ACQUISITION
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    JOE DRESDNER,
    
                              Plaintiff,
                                                               Civil Action No. i7%  2  h'(--
                     V.
    
    LOWELL W.  PAXSON, JEFFREY
    SAGANSKY, JAMES B. BOCOCK,
    BRUCE L.  BURNHAM, JAMES L.
    GREENWALD and WILLIAM E.
    SIMON, JR.
    
                              Defendants,
    
                                       -and-                                                   "  .`
    PAXSON  COMMUNICATIONS                                                                     c  '
                                                                                               .,  ;
    CORPORATION,
    
                              Nominal Defendant. :
    ------------------------------------------------------x
    
                           CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
    
                     Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief, except for paragraph 4 hereof,
    
    which is alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:
    
                                             SUMMARY OF ACTION
    
                     1.       Plaintiff brings this as a class action on behalf of himself and all other
    
    shareholders of defendant  Paxson Communications Corporation ("Paxson" or the "Company")
    
    who are similarly situated, and as a derivative action on behalf of  Paxson, against the
    
    directors and/or senior officers of  Paxson to enjoin wrongful actions by the Individual
    
    Defendants (defined herein) which are intended to benefit defendant Lowell W.  Paxson and
    
    Paxson Communication's other insiders at the expense of the Company's public shareholders,
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • LOWELL W. PAXSON, JEFFREY SAGANSKY, JAMES B. BOCOCK, BRUCE L. BURNHAM, JAMES L. GREENWALD and
  • CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
  • Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief, except for paragraph 4 hereof,
  • shareholders of defendant Paxson Communications Corporation
  • directors and/or senior officers of Paxson to enjoin wrongful actions by the Individual
  • Defendants which are intended to benefit defendant Lowell W. Paxson and
  • Paxson Communication's other insiders at the expense of the Company's public shareholders,
  • sold two warrants to a wholly owned subsidiary of NBC
  • to purchase 13,065,507 shares of Pzxson common stock at an exercise price of $12.60 per
  • share and up to 18,966,620 shares cf Paxson common stock at an exercise price equal to the
  • Defendants constitute a breach of t r fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of Paxson
  • Defendant Ja es L. Greenwald is and was,
  • thereb aking appropriate injunctive relief and/or corresponding
  • Investment Agreement with NBC pursuant to which NBC will
  • preferred stock, convertible at any ti le into 3 1,896,032 shares of Paxson Class A common
  • material agreement which would disadvantage NBC relative to other stockholders on the basis
  • proposal which offered a substantial premium for Paxson shareholders,
  • Paxson represents a highly attractive acquisition candidate.
  • independent business judgment in deciding whether to bring this action.
  •    |