LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SUSSER v PLAINS ALL AMERICAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,627, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: I-N THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: SUSSER, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017627, General Partner, Demand, Liability, Complaint, Limited Partnership, Partnership, Monetary Damages, Failure, Facts, Directors, Plains, Securities, Futility, Disinterestedness, Allegations, Del, Settlement, Partnership Agreement, Fiduciary Duties, Particularity, Substantial Likelihood, Stipulation, Question Defendants, Parties, Accounting, Controls, York Plaza, Shareholders, Plains Resources, Class Actions, Losses, Expenses, President, Shareholders Litig, Federal Securities , ContentID: 120240595

Case Documents
1 2001-12-06 STIPULATOIN AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126734
10 pages
PDF
2 2000-08-11 BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102631
30 pages
PDF
3 1999-12-03 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101556
11 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 51 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . STIPULATOIN AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SETTLEMENT
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
PLAINTIFFS
COURT
STIPULATION
DEFENDANTS
PARTIES
COUNSEL
EXPENSES
ATTORNEYS
PLAINS
RISK
HERETO
FEES
TRADING
DIRECTORS
UNITHOLDERS
JUDGEMENT
POLICIES
CHANCERY
DELAWARE
AMERICAN
LAW
CLASS ACTIONS
DERIVATIVE ACTION
COMPLAINT
EXECUTORS
REASON
APPROVING
                                                                   ORIGINAL

                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

---------------------------------------------------------------x
IN RE PLAINS ALL AMERICAN INC.                                          CONSOLIDATED
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                                 C.A. NO. 17627-NC
--------------------------------------------------------------x


                                              STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT
                               OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE


            The parties to the above-captioned consolidated action (the "Action"), by and through

their respective attorneys, have entered into the following Stipulation and  Agreepent  of

Compromise, Settlement and Release (the "Stipulation" or "Settlement") subject to  theapproval

of the Court:

            WHEREAS:

            (4          Plaintiffs are beneficial holders of Limited Partnership units of Plains

American Pipeline, L.P.  ("PAAP"  or the "Limited Partnership") and were such prior to and at      

the time of the events that are the subject of the Action. The General Partner of PAAP is Plains

All American Inc. (the "General Partner"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Plains Resources Inc.

("Plains Resources").

            (b)         On November 29, 1999, the Limited Partnership announced that it had

unauthorized trading activity by one of its traders that resulted in a loss of approximately $160

million. The full extent of the trading losses was determined and publicly announced both by

press releases and in subsequent public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

            cc>         After the losses were announced, twenty class action lawsuits alleging 

of the federal securities laws were filed in the Southern District of Texas (the "Class Actions").


SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • The parties to the above-captioned consolidated action,
  • Settlement and Release (the "Stipulation" or "Settlement") subject to theapproval
  • All American Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Plains Resources Inc.
  • The full extent of the trading losses was determined and publicly announced both by
  • and one on behalf of unitholders of the Limited Partnership.
  • Feeback (the "Director Defendants").
  • The complaint in the initial action tiled by plaintiff Susser was
  • above-named current and former directors of the General Partner breached their fiduciary
  • incurred by and potential liability of the Company in connection with the Class Actions.
  • Plaintiffs, through their counsel, have made a thorough investigation of the facts
  • 09 Defendants deny that any of them is subject to any liability whatsoever by reason
  • its existing trading policies, enhance its processes and procedures and improve its ability to
  • standalone position of Risk Manager.
  • unknown, liquidated or unliquidated, contingent or absolute, state or federal, in law or
  • directors, officers, agents, employees, attorneys, accountants, representatives, advisers,
  • limited partners, heirs, executors, personal representatives, administrators, predecessors,
  • Notice of Pendency of Derivative Action, Proposed Settlement of Derivative Action, Settlement
  • Hearing and Right to Appear substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit
  • the parties hereto shall jointly move the Court for the entry of an Order and Final Judgment,
  • to apply for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses not to exceed a total of $1,050,000.
  • Court's Final Judgment approving the Settlement, if no such appeal is filed if separately

  • 2 . BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEMAND
    DEFENDANTS
    LIABILITY
    COMPLAINT
    MONETARY DAMAGES
    FAILURE
    PLAINTIFF
    FACTS
    LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    SECURITIES
    FUTILITY
    DISINTERESTEDNESS
    ALLEGATIONS
    DIRECTORS
    DEL
    PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
    PARTICULARITY
    SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD
    QUESTION DEFENDANTS
    YORK PLAZA
    SHAREHOLDERS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIG
    ACCOUNTING
    FEDERAL SECURITIES
    INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT
    AMERICAN PIPELINE
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    GENERAL PARTNER REBUT
    
               I-N THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                       k
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    IN RE PLAINS ALL AMERICAN            >
    INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION          )    Cons. C. A. No. 17627-NC
    
    
                                 BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS
                      IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
    
    
                                              RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER
                                              Jesse A. Finkelstein
                                              Michael D. Allen
                                              One Rodney Square
                                              Wilmington, DE 19801
                                              (302) 658-6541
                                                 Attorneys for Defendants Plains All
                                                 American, Inc., Greg L. Armstrong,
                                                 Harry Pefanis, Phillip  D. Kramer,
                                                 George R. Coiner, Michael R.
                                                 Patterson, Cynthia A.  Feeback,
                                                 Robert V. Sinnott and Arthur L.
                                                  Smith and Nominal Defendant Plains
                                                  All American Pipeline, L.P.
    
    OF COUNSEL
    Gregory  E'. Joseph
    Fried, Frank, Harris,
     Shriver C& Jacobson
    One New York Plaza
    New York, NY 10004-1980
    (212) 859-8000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    RLFI-2192918-1
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Shriver C& Jacobson One New York Plaza New York,
  • THE COMPLAINT MUST BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO MARE A PRE-SIJIT DEMAND ON THE GENERAL PARTNER
  • Sufficient To Call Into Question Defendants' Disinterestedness 12
  • There Is No Risk of Monetary Damages 14
  • The General Partner is Not a Defendant in the Securities
  • `The Actions of the General Partner Rebut the Claim of Demand
  • THE COMPLAINT MUST BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND DRULPA SECTION 17-
  • In re Baxller Int'l Inc. Shareholders Litip., Del.
  • In re Delta and Pine Land Co. Shareholders Litig.,
  • This unitholder derivative action was filed after Plains All American Pipeline,
  • Inc. and certain of its directors and officers breached their
  • Demand Futility.
  • plaintiff makes the naked assertion that demand is excused
  • MO particzrlavized allegations regarding the defendants' claimed lack of disinterestedness,
  • There is therefore no substantial likelihood of liability.
  • PartnersbIp Act alllows a limited partnership, in its partnership agreement, to
  • This Statement of Facts is, therefore, drawn from the Complaint and documents referred to in
  • lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed in the Southern
  • Plaintiff alleges that "any appropriate system of accounting and internal
  • A complaint asserting such a claim "shall set forth with particularity the effort,
  • n determining demand futility the Court of Chancery in the proper exercise of'its discretion
  • the Limited Partnership for breaching their fiduciary duties; and "the General Partner is
  • PI.aintiff Has Not IPled A Substantial Likelihood of Liability Sufficient To Call Into
  • there are no allegations of intentional misconduct in the Complaint.
  • The Actions of the General Partner Rebut the Claim of Demand Futility

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    PLAINS
    DEFENDANTS
    GENERAL PARTNER
    CONTROLS
    PLAINS RESOURCES
    LOSSES
    PRESIDENT
    PLAINTIFF
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    BUSINESS
    OFFICER
    DIRECTORS
    ALLEGES
    OPERATING
    ACCOUNTING
    PRACTICES
    TRADES
    SINNOTT
    CREDIT
    INVESTMENT
    MARKETING
    PLAINS MIDSTREAM SUBSIDIARIES
    VICE PRESIDENT
    AUDIT
    WRONGFUL
    REASONS
    SUPERVISION
    CLASS ACTIONS
    
                            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
         \
    \                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
               LESLIE SUSSER,
    
                                                     Plaintiff,
    
                      V.
    
               PLAINS ALL AMERICAN INC., GREG L.
               ARMSTRONG, HARRY N. PEFANIS, PHILLIP  D.
               KRAMER, GEORGE R. COINER,
               MICHAEL R. PATTERSON, CYNTHIA A. FEEBACK,
               ROBERT V. SINNOTT and ARTHUR L. SMITH,
    
                                                     Defendants,
    
                      - and -
    
               PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P., a Delaware
               Limited Partnership,
    
                                             Nominal Defendant.
    
    
    
                                                       COMPLAINT
    
                              Plaintiff brings this action derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant
    
              Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. ("Plains" or the "Limited Partnership") and alleges
    
              upon personal knowledge as to his own acts and as to all other matters upon
    
              information and belief, as follows:
    
                                                     INTRODUCTION
    
                              1.            This is a unitholder's derivative action brought pursuant
    
              Del. C. ~17-1001 by plaintiff who is now and at all relevant times was a unitholder of
    
              Plains. This action is brought for the benefit of Plains against defendants for breach of
    
    
    
    their fiduciary duties causing serious damage to Plains and to its reputation and credit
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff brings this action derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant
  • Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. ("Plains" or the "Limited Partnership") and alleges
  • in the business, financial and investment communities.
  • Plains and its operating partnerships,
  • Marketing and AAPL collectively the "Partnership") were formed in late 1998 to acquire
  • subsidiaries ("Plains Midstream Subsidiaries" or "Predecessor") of Plains Resources
  • Except where otherwise specifically indicated the term "defendants" does not
  • wholly owned subsidiary of Plains Resources, is the general partner of the Limited
  • Chief Executive Officer and a director of the General Partner.
  • Defendant Harry N. Pefanis is President and Chief
  • Executive Vice President - Midstream and Plains Resources since May 1998.
  • Defendant Robert V. Sinnott is a director of the General
  • The Audit Committee reviews the external financial reporting of the Limited
  • The wrongful activities alleged herein occurred in whole or in part,
  • because the Limited Partnership's financial and accounting systems and internal
  • controls were and are wholly inadequate.
  • The General Partner and its directors owe the Limited Partnership
  • To discharge their fiduciary duties,
  • policies, practices, controls, and financial affairs of the Limited Partnership.
  • To exercise reasonable control and supervision over the officers
  • for the reasons set forth below:
  • securities class actions described above and faces a substantial likelihood of liability
  • losses and is forcing the Limited Partnership to renegotiate major credit agreements.
  • As a result of the $160 million losses from these trades,
  • reputation and credit in the business, financial and investment communities have been
  •    |