LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

HARPER v NICHOLS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,652, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: HARPER, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017652, Gleason, Individual Defendants, Vestar, Transaction, Duties, Stock, Investor, Fiduciary Duties, Common, Shares, Officers, Price, Directors, Damages, David, Management, Outstanding, President, Stockholders, Suffer, Plan, Senior Management, Material Information, Breach, Executive Offices, York, Vice President , ContentID: 120240581

Case Documents
1 1999-12-10 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101529
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
VESTAR
TRANSACTION
DUTIES
STOCK
INVESTOR
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
COMMON
SHARES
OFFICERS
PRICE
DIRECTORS
DAMAGES
DAVID
MANAGEMENT
OUTSTANDING
PRESIDENT
STOCKHOLDERS
SUFFER
PLAN
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
MATERIAL INFORMATION
BREACH
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
YORK
VICE PRESIDENT
                                                                                                   
                                                                          2,".   r*  r  ("'  i,    
                                                                          ,  `.                    
                                                                          i  ;        I  *         
                                                                           _'  i  1  ".       _    

                         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
\  '                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


        WILLIAM HARPER, individually and on behalf of
        all others similarly situated,

                                          Plaintiff,

                   - against -

        SILAS L. NICHOLS, ROBERT L. SMIALEK,
        DAVID J. BURNS, J. DAVID CARTWRIGHT,
        JAMES S. GLEASON, MARTIN L. ANDERSON,
        JOHN W. GUFFEY, JR., WILLIAM P.
        MONTAGUE, GLEASON CORPORATION and
        VESTAR CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.

                                          Defendants.



                                                        INTRODUCTION

                   1.      Plaintiff alleges on information and belief, except for those

        pertain to plaintiff which are alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:

                   2.      This action arises out of an unlawful scheme and plan by Vestar Capital

        Partners, Inc. ("Vestar") and certain senior management (the "Investor Group") of Gleason

        Corporation ("Gleason" or the "Company") to acquire the remaining ownership of the

        Company in a going-private transaction for grossly inadequate consideration and without

        full and complete disclosure of all material information, in breach of defendants' fiduciary

        duties.
                                                        THE PARTIES

                   3.      Plaintiff is and has been at all relevant times the owner of Gleason

SNIPPETS:
  • pertain to plaintiff which are alleged upon personal knowledge,
  • This action arises out of an unlawful scheme and plan by Vestar Capital
  • Inc. and certain senior management (the "Investor Group") of Gleason
  • Company in a going-private transaction for grossly inadequate consideration and without
  • full and complete disclosure of all material information, in breach of defendants' fiduciary
  • of the Delaware with its principal executive offices located at 1000 University Avenue,
  • Rochester, New York.
  • December 31, 1997, Gleason had issued and outstanding 9,943,241 shares of common
  • stock outstanding, of which the senior management of Gleason taking the Company
  • W Defendant James S. Gleason is and was at all relevant times Chairman, President and Chief
  • directors and officers own 15%.
  • The individual defendants named above,
  • officers and/or directors of Company, owe the highest fiduciary duties of good faith, loyalty,
  • individually and on behalf of all other stockholders of the Company (except the
  • The Class is so numerous thatjoinder of all members is impracticable.
  • each of the members of the Class, who has suffered or will suffer damages, to bring
  • the price of Gleason stock traded
  • Unless enjoined by this Court, defendants will continue to breach their
  •    |