LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

JAROSLAWICZ v GLEASON CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,663, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE IOF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: JAROSLAWICZ, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017663, Proposed Merger, Gleason, Common Stock, Shareholders, Public Shareholders, Price, Unfair, Shares, Vestar, Outstanding, Duties, Reason, Adequate Disclosure, Breach, Inadequate, Prior, York, Growth, Directors, Damages, Relief, Consummation, Investment, Management, Dealing , ContentID: 120240570

Case Documents
1 1999-12 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101515
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
PROPOSED MERGER
GLEASON
COMMON STOCK
SHAREHOLDERS
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
PRICE
UNFAIR
SHARES
VESTAR
OUTSTANDING
DUTIES
REASON
ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE
BREACH
INADEQUATE
PRIOR
YORK
GROWTH
DIRECTORS
DAMAGES
BUSINESS
RELIEF
COUNSEL
CONSUMMATION
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
DEALING
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE IOF DELAWARE
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

---------------------------------------------------------------x
DAVID JAROSLAWICZ,

                                       Plaintiff,                        Civil Action No. i 7 G (G3

          - against -
                                                                         CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
GLEASON CORPORATION, VESTAR CAPITAL:
PARTNERS, INC., JAMES S. GLEASON,                                   :
DAVID J. BURNS, ROBERT L. SMIALEK,                                  :
J. DAVID CARTWRIGHT, MARTIN L.                                      :
ANDERSON, JOHN W. GUFFEY, JR.,                                      :
WILLIAM P. MONTAGUE, DONALD D.                                      :
LENNOX, SILIAS L. NICHOLS and
JULIAN W. ATWATER,

                                       Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------x

          Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, alleges upon

knowledge as to himself and his own acts and as to all other matters upon information and belief,

as follows:

                                                      THE PARTIES

          1.        Plaintiff has been the owner of shares of the common stock of defendant Gleason

Corporation ("Gleason" or the "Company") and has owned such shares continuously since prior

to the wrongs complained of herein.

          2.        (a>       Gleason is a corporation duly existing and organized under the laws

State of Delaware with its principal executive offices located at 1000 University Avenue, P.O. Box

22970, Rochester, New York. The Company is a world-wide leader in the development,

manufacture and sale of gear production machinery and related equipment for the automotive,

aerospace, agriculture, construction and marine industries.



               0-4     As of September 30, 1999, the Company had approximately  9,586,178
SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, alleges upon personal
  • Corporation ("Gleason" or the "Company") and has owned such shares continuously since prior
  • 22970, Rochester, New York.
  • shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
  • Defendant Vestar Capital Partners, Inc. is an investment banking firm
  • controls approximately 15% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock.
  • Atwater are and were, at all times relevant hereto, Directors of the Company.
  • herein as the "Director Defendants.
  • plaintiff and the other public shareholders of Gleason the highest duties of good faith,
  • dealing, due care, loyalty and full, candid and adequate disclosure.
  • interest in the Company by reason of defendants' actions as more fully described herein (the
  • The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is
  • unfair to the public shareholders of Gleason; and whether plaintiff and the other members of
  • the Class are entitled to injunctive relief or damages as a result of defendants' wrongful
  • the Class and has retained counsel competent and experienced in class action litigation.
  • since the damages suffered by the individual Class members may be
  • Plaintiff anticipates no unusual difficulties in the management of this action
  • The proposed merger was unanimously approved by the
  • valuable business and assets.
  • Gleason's common share price to purchase the Company at a wholly unfair and inadequate price
  • Company's future prospects for continued growth and profitability; the $23 per share offer
  • Following consummation of the proposed merger, only the Acquiring Persons will be in a
  • By reason of the foregoing, defendants have breached and continue to breach their
  •    |