LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

NATVAR SHAH v GA GROUP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,678, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN, Plaintiff: NATVAR SHAH, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017678, Shah, Subsidiaries, Stock, Demand, Delaware, Purchase Agreement, Shah Engineering, Epm Funding, Stock Purchase, Directors, Stockholder, Inspection, Admit, Relating, Rights, Guarantors, Daspin, Thereof, Federal Action, Delaware Corporation, Documents Evidencing, Pursuant, Books, Document Speak, Registered Agent, Amendment, Complaint, Allegations, Shah Stock Purchase, Contracts, Gane, Drafts Thereof, Referring, Stock Purchase Agreement, Connection, Paragraph, Relief, Allegations Pertaining , ContentID: 120240557

Case Documents
1 2000-01-24 DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101496
4 pages
PDF
2 1999-12-16 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101497
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 14 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANTS
ADMIT
DELAWARE CORPORATION
DOCUMENT SPEAK
COMPLAINT
ALLEGATIONS
SHAH STOCK PURCHASE
EPM FUNDING
STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DEMAND
PARAGRAPH
RELIEF
ALLEGATIONS PERTAINING
SHAH ENGINEERING
DASPIN
REGARD
AVERMENTS
DGCL AFFORDS
RIGHTS
STATUTE
COURT
NORTHEAST
PARTNERSHIP
DENY
PROPER
STOCKHOLDER
FEDERAL ACTION
PURPOSES PROPER
 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN
                          AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

NATVAR SHAH, P.E.,

                          Plaintiff

V.

GA GROUP INC, a Delaware corporation, )
GA GROUP NORTHEAST INC., a
Delaware corporation, NEW SHAH, INC., i
a Delaware corporation, SHAH
ENGINEERING, INC., a New York                 i
corporation, SHAH ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERING AND LAND                          i
SURVEYING, P.C., a New York                   1
corporation, EPM FUNDING                      )
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, )
EPM FUNDING, L. P., a Delaware Limited )
Partnership,
                                              ;
                          Defendants          )


                   DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT

        Defendants by way of Answer to the Complaint say as follows:

        1.      As paragraph 1 of the complaint only states the Plaintiff's stated reasons

for bringing the action and relief Plaintff seeks Defendants neither admit nor deny but

leave Plaintiff to his proofs.

        7_.     Denied.

        3.      Admit.

        4.      Admit.

        5. .    Admit that New Shah is a Delaware Corporation, wholly owned

subsidiary of GANE, that New Shah's registered agent is as set forth in the Complaint.

Regarding the allegation as to preferred stock of New Shah reference is made to the

Amendment of the certificate of Corporation and exhibit A attached thereto, said

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN
  • NATVAR SHAH, P.E.,
  • GA GROUP NORTHEAST INC., a Delaware corporation, NEW SHAH, INC., i a Delaware corporation,
  • CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,) EPM FUNDING, L. P., a Delaware Limited) Partnership,
  • DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT
  • As paragraph 1 of the complaint only states the Plaintiff's stated reasons
  • leave Plaintiff to his proofs.
  • Admit.
  • Admit as to allegations pertaining to Shah Associates
  • and Shah Engineering.
  • Equity Group, Inc., that Mr. Daspin was a GA director in 1996.
  • allegations pertaining to the Shah Stock Purchase Agreement,
  • Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny what the
  • pro se plaintiff in a federal action against Mr. Shah.
  • The terms of the demand stated in the letter speak for itself.
  • purposes proper as a stockholder.
  • In regard to averments concerning the Shah stock Purchase Agreement,
  • the terms of said document speak for itself.
  • Section 220 of the DGCL affords the Plaintiff no rights with respect to either
  • authorized by the Statute.
  • denying the relief sought by Plaintiff and providing such other relief to

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SUBSIDIARIES
    STOCK
    DELAWARE
    PURCHASE AGREEMENT
    STOCK PURCHASE
    DIRECTORS
    DEMAND
    SHAH ENGINEERING
    INSPECTION
    RELATING
    EPM FUNDING
    STOCKHOLDER
    GUARANTORS
    THEREOF
    RIGHTS
    FEDERAL ACTION
    DASPIN
    DOCUMENTS EVIDENCING
    PURSUANT
    BOOKS
    REGISTERED AGENT
    AMENDMENT
    COURT
    CONTRACTS
    GANE
    BUSINESS
    DRAFTS THEREOF
    REFERRING
    CONNECTION
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    NATVAR SHAH, P.E.,                              >
                                                    >
                  Plaintiff,                        >
                                                    >
           V.                                       >
                                                    >
    GA GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation,         >
    GA GROUP NORTHEAST, INC., a                     >
    Delaware corporation, NEW SHAH, INC.,           >
    a Delaware corporation, SHAH                    >
    ENGINEERING, INC., a New York                   >
    corporation, SHAH ASSOCIATES                    >
    ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEY,                    >
    P.C., a New York corporation, EPM               >
    FUNDING CORPORATION, a Delaware                 >
    corporation, and EPM FUNDING, L.P.,             >
    a Delaware limited partnership,                 >
                                                    >
                  Defendants.                       >
    
    
                                 COMPLAINT UNDER 8 DEL. C. 8 223
    
    
                  Plaintiff Natvar ("Nick") Shah, P.E. ("Mr. Shah"), by and through his
    
    undersigned attorneys, as and for his complaint against defendants, alleges upon knowledge as to
    
    himself and otherwise upon information and belief as follows:
    
                                       NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
                   1.      This action, brought under Sections  220(c)  and (d) of the Delaware
    
    General Corporation Law ("DGCL"), and pursuant to certain of Mr. Shah's contractual rights,
    
    seeks relief in the form of an order compelling defendants, GA Group, Inc. ("GA"), GA Group
    
    Northeast, Inc. ("GANE"), and New Shah, Inc. ("New Shah") (collectively the "Companies"), to
    
    make certain books and records available for inspection and copying by Mr. Shah on a summary
    
    basis, as demanded by Mr. Shah in a letter dated November 12, 1999 (the "Demand," Exhibit A
    
    hereto). This action also seeks to compel Shah Engineering, Inc. ("Shah Engineering"), Shah
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff Natvar Shah, P.E., by and through his
  • brought under Sections 220and of the Delaware
  • General Corporation Law, and pursuant to certain of Mr. Shah's contractual rights,
  • and EPM Funding, L.P. to make certain books and records available, pursuant to certain of Mr.
  • December 1, 1997, with the Companies, Shah Engineering, Shah Associates, EPM Funding
  • Corporation and EPM Funding, L.P. (the "Shah Stock Purchase Agreement," Exhibit B hereto).
  • GANE is a Delaware corporation with its principal office located at 9
  • GANE's registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is Harvard
  • Business Services, Inc., 25 Greystone Manor, Lewes, DE 19958-97'76.
  • EPM Funding Corporation and EPM Funding, L.P. (collectively, the "Guarantors")
  • dealings between the parties is E. Michael Daspin.
  • from public records that the two original directors of GA worked for ROE,
  • Mr. Daspin himself appears as a pro se plaintiff in the Federal Action (in which the
  • By letter dated November 12, 1999, Mr. Shalh made the Demand upon the
  • Companies and their Subsidiaries (meaning any entity in which any of the Companies have any
  • committees or subcommittees thereof, for each of the Companies and their Subsidiaries, and any
  • and any drafts thereof;
  • g. all documents evidencing, referring to or relating to any actions purportedly taken by
  • purported approval or adoption of the Amendment by New Shah's board of directors;
  • legal advice received by New Shah and/or its board of directors in connection with the
  • all contracts between any of the Companies or their Subsidiaries and any other entities.
  • related to his position as a director of the Companies under Sec.tion 220, and the inspection
  • sought is for purposes that are proper for a stockholder demand under Section 220.
  •    |