LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

420 ENERGY INVESTMENTS v XPLOR ENERGY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,692, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE C 2 I, Plaintiff: 420 ENERGY INVESTMENTS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017692, Energy, Common Stock, Xplor, Petitioners, Shares, Delaware, Alleged Merger, Respondent, Petition, Provisions, Investments, Suite, Grant Street, Eri Investments, Resources, Oxford, Pittsburgh, Investment, Payment, Pursuant, Equitable Resources, Beneficial Holder, Entitlement, Demand, Attention, David Pruitt, Chancery, Hereby, Xei Acquisition, Harken Energy, Merger, Sworn, Midland, Expenses, Fees, Holders, Compliance, Outstanding, Appraisal Rights, Accordance, Timely Demand, Withdrawn, Agreement , ContentID: 120240546

Case Documents
1 2000-02-01 ANSWER TO PETITION FOR APPRAISAL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101478
4 pages
PDF
2 1999-12-21 PETITION FOR APPRAISAL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101479
3 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 7 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ANSWER TO PETITION FOR APPRAISAL

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ENERGY
PETITION
INVESTMENTS
RESPONDENT
SUITE
GRANT STREET
COURT
RESOURCES
OXFORD
PITTSBURGH
DELAWARE
ERI INVESTMENTS
COMMON STOCK
SHARES
EQUITABLE RESOURCES
BENEFICIAL HOLDER
ATTENTION
DAVID PRUITT
CHANCERY
COUNSEL
HEREBY
XEI ACQUISITION
HARKEN ENERGY
PURSUANT
MERGER
LAW
PROVISIONS
SWORN
MIDLAND
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE c 2 I$[ b@L
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

420 ENERGY INVESTMENT, INC.,
and ERI INVESTMENTS, INC.,
                         Petitioners,                                                  _  .:
                                                         Civil Action No. 17692 NC      :
v.

XPLOR ENERGY, INC.,

                         Respondent.

                          ANSWER TO PETITION FOR APPRAISAL

               Respondent XPLOR Energy, Inc. ("XPLOR"), by and through its undersigned

counsel, hereby responds to the Petition as follows:

               1. Admitted.

               2. Admitted. By way  OF further answer, XPLOR avers that on August 19, 1999,

XEI Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of  Harken Energy Corporation, merged with

and into XPLOR ("Merger")

               3. Admitted that, pursuant to the Merger, XPLOR converted each outstanding

share of XPLOR common stock ("Common Stock") into the right to receive no consideration.

               3. The allegations in paragraph 4 of the Petition state conclusions of law as to

which no responsive pleading is required. XPLOR admits that Petitioners have taken all actions

necessary to be entitled to petition this Court for appraisal pursuant to the provisions of Section

262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, and that the shares of record in Petitioners' names

are subject to the exclusive remedy of appraisal in accordance with the provisions of Section

262, otherwise denied



               WHEREFORE, Respondent, XPLOR Energy, Inc. requests that the Court:

               A.        determine the fair value of the shares of XPLOR Common Stock;

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE c 2 I$[b@L
  • 420 ENERGY INVESTMENT, INC.,
  • and ERI INVESTMENTS, INC.,
  • ANSWER TO PETITION FOR APPRAISAL
  • Respondent XPLOR Energy, Inc., by and through its undersigned
  • share of XPLOR common stock into the right to receive no consideration.
  • The allegations in paragraph 4 of the Petition state conclusions of law as to
  • necessary to be entitled to petition this Court for appraisal pursuant to the provisions of
  • 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, and that the shares of record in Petitioners'
  • OF COUNSEL:
  • result of the merger of XEI Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Harken Energy
  • Resources, One Oxford Centre, Suite 3300, 301 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
  • 420 Energy Investments, Inc., c/o Equitable Resources, One Oxford Centre, Suite 3300, 301
  • Oxford Centre, Suite 3300, 301 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Beneficial Holder: ERI
  • Midland, TX 79701, attention: David Pruitt Beneficial Holder: New West Resources, Inc., 500
  • nd sworn to before me this 3 1 day of January,
  • I Joelle E. Polesky hereby certify that two copies of the foregoing ANSWER TO

  • 2 . PETITION FOR APPRAISAL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PETITIONERS
    ALLEGED MERGER
    SHARES
    DELAWARE
    ENERGY
    LAW
    INVESTMENT
    PAYMENT
    PROVISIONS
    COURT
    ENTITLEMENT
    DEMAND
    EXPENSES
    FEES
    ERI INVESTMENTS
    XPLOR
    RESPONDENT
    ATTORNEYS
    HOLDERS
    PURSUANT
    COMPLIANCE
    OUTSTANDING
    APPRAISAL RIGHTS
    ACCORDANCE
    TIMELY DEMAND
    WITHDRAWN
    AGREEMENT
    WHEREFORE
    PETITIONERS RESPECTFULLY REQUEST
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    420 ENERGY INVESTMENT, INC.
    and ERI INVESTMENTS, INC.,
    
                          Petitioners,
    
                  V.
    
    XPLOR ENERGY, INC.,
    
                          Respondent.
    
    
                                    PETITION FOR APPRAISAL
    
                  Petitioners, 420 Energy Investment, Inc. and ERI Investments, Inc., by their
    
    undersigned attorneys, hereby state as follows:
    
                  1.      Petitioners are, and at all times relevant to ,this proceeding have been,
    
    the record holders of $0.001 par value common stock (the"`Common Stock") of XPLOR
    
    Energy, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
    
                  2.      The Company, the respondent herein, is the surviving corporation of an
    
    alleged merger on August 19, 1999, between the Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
    
    Harken Energy Corporation allegedly pursuant to Section 228 of the Delaware General
    
    Corporation Law (the "Alleged Merger").
    
                  3.      As a result of the Alleged Merger, the Company purportedly converted
    
    each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company held in the name of Petitioners into
    
    the right to receive no consideration and (the "Merger Consideration").
    
    
    
                  4.      To the extent the Alleged Merger was effective and valid under
    
    Delaware law, Petitioners became entitled to payment of the fair value of the Common Stock
    
    upon compliance with the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • 420 ENERGY INVESTMENT, INC. and ERI INVESTMENTS, INC.,
  • Petitioners, 420 Energy Investment, Inc. and ERI Investments, Inc., by their
  • undersigned attorneys, hereby state as follows:
  • the record holders of $0.001 par value common stock of XPLOR
  • The Company, the respondent herein, is the surviving corporation of an
  • Harken Energy Corporation allegedly pursuant to Section 228 of the Delaware General
  • As a result of the Alleged Merger,
  • each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company held in the name of Petitioners into
  • Delaware law, Petitioners became entitled to payment of the fair value of the Common Stock
  • upon compliance with the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation
  • Petitioners have perfected their appraisal rights for their shares
  • of the Common Stock in accordance with the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware
  • Petitioners have continuously held their shares of the Common
  • Stock through the date of the Alleged Merger and have filed a timely demand with the
  • have not withdrawn their demand for appraisal, have not submitted their shares to the
  • Company for the Merger Consideration and have not reached any agreement with the
  • WHEREFORE, Petitioners respectfully request that this Court, to the extent
  • Determine the entitlement to appraisal of all other holders of the
  • E. Order the Company to pay all expenses incurred by Petitioners in
  • without limitation, costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and fees and expenses of experts;
  •    |