LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE THE STUDENT LOAN CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,799, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT 0 F CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: KAHN, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017799, Student Loan, Citigroup, Del, Facts, Directors, Student, Loan, Complaint, Controlling Shareholder, Demand, Delaware, Business Judgment, Motion, Unfair Self-dealing, Support, York, Allegations, Transactions, Individual Defendants, Self-dealing Transactions, Duty, Dismiss, Aronson, Shareholder, Beckman, Costs, Citicorp, Independence, Expense, Complaint Alleges, Gallant, Supr, Compensation, Subsidiaries, Authorities, Act, Officers, Cnys, Citibank, Stockholders, Wilkinson, Reserve Requirements , ContentID: 120240491

Case Documents
1 2002-01-08 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126781
11 pages
PDF
2 2001-12-21 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS OF CITIGROUP THE STUDENT LOAN CORP. AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127186
15 pages
PDF
3 2001-12-03 PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127116
22 pages
PDF
4 2001-07-26 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127117
20 pages
PDF
5 2000-02-18 STOCKHOLDERS DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101371
14 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 82 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . LETTER OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT
CITIGROUP
TRANSACTIONS
DIRECTORS
DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
DEFENDANTS
DEMAND
FACTS
ALLEGES
STANDARD
MOTION
DISMISS
CONTENDS
LOYALTY
WASTE
REASONS
FAIRNESS STANDARD
CHANCERY RULE
SUPPORT
ALLEGATIONS
BECKMANN
DEL
COURT
YORK
PLEADS
BREACH
INFERENCE
CARE
COMPENSATION
                                              COURT  OF   C HANCERY
                                                       O F   T H E
                                               STATE  OF   D EL AWARE


L EO E.  STRINE,  J R.                                                                 CO URT  HOUSE
   V I C E - C H A N C E L L O R                                               WILMINGTON . 
                                                 January 8, 2002

   Norman M. Monhait, Esquire
   Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross  & Goddess
   Mellon Bank Center, Suite 1401
   P.O. Box 1070
    Wilmington, DE 19899

    Edward P. Welch, Esquire
    Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher  & Flom
    One Rodney Square
    P.O. Box 636
    Wilmington, DE 19899-0636

    Jon E. Abramczyk, Esquire
    Morris, Nichols, Arsht  & Tunnel1
     120 1 North Market Street
    P.O. Box 1347
    Wilmington, DE  19899- 1347

    Re: In Re The Student Loan Corp. Derivative Litigation. C.A. No. 17799

    Dear Counsel:

                         Before the court is a motion to dismiss a derivative complaint brought

     on behalf of The Student Loan Corporation against Student Loan's directors,

     its corporate parent Citibank (New York), and its corporate grandparent,

     Citigroup, Inc. Citibank (New York) owns 80% of the common stock of

     Student Loan, and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. For the sake

     of simplicity, I hereinafter refer to both Citibank (New York) and Citigroup



In Re The Student Loan Corp. Derivative Litigation,  C.A. No. 17799
January 8,2002
Page 2

SNIPPETS:
  • In Re The Student Loan Corp. Derivative Litigation.
  • Before the court is a motion to dismiss a derivative complaint brought
  • its corporate parent Citibank (New York), and its corporate grandparent,
  • and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup.
  • In Re The Student Loan Corp. Derivative Litigation,
  • The grounds for the motion are straightforward.
  • therefore be dismissed under Court of Chancery Rule 23.1.
  • the defendants argue that the complaint fails to state a claim
  • four of the six Student Loan directors cannot impartially consider a demand,
  • the facts in the complaint do not support the inference that the transactions
  • because the complaint is bereft of factual allegations supporting an inference
  • The Allegations In The Complaint
  • the complaint alleges that Student Loan
  • the complaint contends that Student Loan's failure to
  • l Defendant Bill Beckmann - Beckmann is Student Loan's Chief
  • receives compensation of over $500,000 annually.
  • The transactions do not meet that standard,
  • asserts a claim for breach of the fiduciary duty of loyalty.
  • a waste of corporate assets.
  • resulted from an unspecified lack of due care on the part of the Student Loan
  • The complaint pleads that the
  • Del.
  • independently of Citigroup and that the entire fairness standard will apply,
  • For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion to dismiss under

  • 2 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS OF CITIGROUP THE STUDENT LOAN CORP. AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STUDENT LOAN
    PLAINTIFF
    DEFENDANTS
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    DIRECTORS
    ARONSON
    CITIGROUP
    COURT
    SUPR
    COMPLAINT
    FACTS
    DELAWARE
    SUPPORT
    MOTION
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    INDEPENDENCE
    ALLEGATIONS
    BENEROFE
    TRANSACTIONS
    AUTHORITIES
    VALID EXERCISE
    PLAINTIFF FAILS
    CONTROLLING
    CHANDLER
    MAJORITY
    PARTICULARIZED FACTS
    DELAWARE LAW
    PRESUMPTION
    CHANCELLOR
    
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    IN RE THE STUDENT LOAN CORP. : CONSOLIDATED
    DERIVATIVE LITIGATION                    C.A. No. 17799-NC                        _
    
    
                                                                                .:
    
    
    
            REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS
                   OF CITIGROUP INC., THE STUDENT LOAN
              CORPORATION, AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    
    
                                      SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
                                         MEAGHER  & FLOM LLP
                                      One Rodney Square
                                      P.O. Box 636
                                      Wilmington, Delaware 19899-0636
                                      (302) 651-3000
                                      Attorneys for Defendant Citigroup Inc.
    
                                      MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT
                                         & TUNNELL
                                      1201 North Market Street
                                      P.O. Box 1347
                                      Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1347
                                      (302) 658-9200
                                      Attorneys for Defendant
                                      The Student Loan Corporation and the
                                      Individual Defendants
    
    
    
    DATED: December  21,200l
    
    
    
                                                 TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                                                       
    
    TABLE OF CASES AND AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . i
    
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .                                                                            
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN RE THE STUDENT LOAN CORP.:
  • REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS
  • OF CITIGROUP INC., THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION, AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
  • TABLE OF CASES AND AUTHORITIES.
  • Was A Valid Exercise Of Business Judgment.
  • Aronson v. Lewis, Del.
  • Supr., 473 A.2d SO5.
  • Benerofe v. Cha, D e l.
  • Friedman v. Beninason, Del.
  • No. 17658, Chandler, C..
  • Complaint failed to allege particularized facts sufficient to excuse pre-suit demand and
  • Plaintiff alleges that four of the six members of Student Loan's board have some
  • the Complaint offers no particularized factual allegations from
  • judgment of those directors.
  • allegations that do not cross the high threshold set by Delaware law to establish demand
  • Plaintiff has failed to show that a majority of the board lacked
  • would undermine any of the directors' independence.
  • recklessness that their conduct would not be protected by the business judgment rule.
  • does not allege particularized facts sufficient to excuse demand,
  • Chancellor Chandler dismissed a derivative claim for failure to
  • emoluments"' at the behest of a controlling stockholder were too general to suggest
  • they must forfeit the presumption that they complied with their
  • Plaintiff Has Failed To Show That Approval Of The Transactions
  • Plaintiff fails to respond to this argument.

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    FACTS
    DEL
    STUDENT LOAN
    DEMAND
    DUTY
    DELAWARE
    BECKMAN
    CITIGROUP
    YORK
    CITICORP
    COMPLAINT ALLEGES
    PLAINTIFF
    GALLANT
    DIRECTORS
    SHAREHOLDER
    TRANSACTIONS
    WILKINSON
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER
    FISHER LLP
    BILL BECKMAN
    EMPLOYMENT
    SUBSIDIARIES
    COMPENSATION
    DELAWARE LAW
    RESERVE REQUIREMENTS
    HARNES KELLER
    GARWIN BRONZAFT GERSTEIN
    
                                                                                                ORIGINAL
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------x
    IN RE THE STUDENT LOAN CORP.                                   : CONSOLIDATED
    DERIVATIVE LITIGATION                                          :    C.A. NO. 17799 NC
    ----------------------------------------------------------x
    
    
    
    
                                                 PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF
                                           IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANTS'
                                           MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT                             
                                                                                                       
    
    
    
    
                                                                        ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS
                                                                        & GODDESS, P.A.
                                                                        Norman M. Monhait, Esquire
                                                                        Carmella P. Keener, Esquire
                                                                        Mellon Bank Center
                                                                        Suite 1401
                                                                        P.O. Box 1070
                                                                        Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                                        (302) 656-4433
                                                                        Delaware Liaison Counsel for
    
    Of Counsel:
    
    HARNES KELLER LLC
    964 Third Avenue
    7'h Floor
    New York, NY 10022
    (212) 755-0022
    
    GARWIN BRONZAFT GERSTEIN
     & FISHER LLP
    Suite 1416, 1501 Broadway
    New York, NY 10036
    (212) 398-0055
    
    Dated: December  3,200l
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • HARNES KELLER LLC
  • 7'h Floor New York, NY 10022
  • GARWIN BRONZAFT GERSTEIN & FISHER LLP
  • WHICH SHOW THAT DEMAND IS EXCUSED
  • Bill Beckman
  • Peter M. Gallant
  • Laura D. Wilkinson
  • Defendants' Duty Of Loyalty
  • Benerofe v. Cha, Del.
  • Plaintiff submits this brief in opposition to the motion of defendants to dismiss the
  • As alleged in the Complaint, plaintiff Alan Kahn is a shareholder of Student Loan,
  • the laws of the United States of America and a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup.
  • (Together, Citigroup, CNYS, and Citicorp are hereinafter referred to as
  • The individual defendants are the six members of the Board of Directors of Student
  • its subsidiaries.
  • reserve requirements for what is essentially a federally guaranteed loan portfolio.
  • The Complaint alleges that Citigroup has breached its duty of entire fairness owed to the
  • Company, and that the individual defendants, in approving the above unfair transactions,
  • transactions were not the product of business judgment.
  • FACTS WHICH SHOW THAT DEMAND IS EXCUSED.
  • The Complaint alleges that four of Student Loan's six member board had employment
  • relationships with Citigroup, Student Loan's controlling shareholder, which owned 80% of the
  • That compensation is determined by a Citicorp executive.
  • Under Delaware law, the allegations with respect to Beckman raise a reasonable

  • 4 . OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LOAN
    FACTS
    COURT
    CITIGROUP
    PLAINTIFF
    MOTION
    DIRECTORS
    DEL
    DISMISS
    SUPPORT
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    DEMAND
    ALLEGATIONS
    COMPLAINT
    DELAWARE
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    LITIGATION
    SHAREHOLDER
    CHALLENGED BUSINESS
    INDEPENDENCE
    DISINTEREST
    AUTHORITIES
    CONCLUSORY
    DERIVATIVE ACTION
    CHALLENGED TRANSACTION
    PLEADING STANDARD
    PARTICULARITY
    SALLIE MAE
    NATURE
    
           IN THE COURT 0 F CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    IN RE THE STUDENT LOAN CORP.          :
    DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
    
    
    
    
    
                 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION
                 TO DISMISS OF CITIGROUP INC., THE STUDENT
           LOAN CORPORATION, AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    
    
    
    
                                          SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
                                                 MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
                                          One Rodney Square
                                          P.O. Box 636
                                          Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                          (302) 651-3000
                                          Attorneys for Citigroup Inc.
    
                                          MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT
                                                 & TUNNELL
                                               1201 North Market Street
                                          P.O. Box 1347
                                          Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1347
                                               (302) 658-9200
                                          Attorneys for Defendant
                                          The Student Loan Corporation
    
    
    
    
    
    DATED: July  26,200l
    
    
    
                                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                                                       
    
    TABLE OF CASES AND AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
    
    NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT 0 F CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
  • OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION
  • TO DISMISS OF CITIGROUP INC., THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION, AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
  • TABLE OF CASES AND AUTHORITIES.
  • NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS.
  • Facts That Show Demand Would Have Been Futile.
  • A Majority Of Student Loan's Directors Are Disinterested
  • Of Business Judgment
  • Elancorp., Inc., Del.
  • Inc. Shareholder Litig., Del.
  • Defendants Citigroup Inc., The Student Loan Corporation
  • submit this Opening Brief in support of their motion to dismiss the complaint in this
  • Plaintiff commenced this purported derivative action on February 18,
  • conclusory and unsupported allegations of

  • 5 . STOCKHOLDERS DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CITIGROUP
    DEFENDANTS
    CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER
    UNFAIR SELF-DEALING
    SELF-DEALING TRANSACTIONS
    DIRECTORS
    COSTS
    EXPENSE
    PLAINTIFF
    YORK
    ACT
    OFFICERS
    CNYS
    CITIBANK
    STOCKHOLDERS
    COMPLAINT
    SECURITIZATION
    SUBSIDIARIES
    LOAN PORTFOLIO
    COMPENSATION
    WILLIAMSON
    CAPITAL RESERVE REQUIREMENTS
    RESERVE REQUIREMENTS
    MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
    OUTSTANDING
    ATTORNEYS
    INCUR EXCESSIVE COSTS
    SERVICING
    BORROWINGS
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                                                         X
    
    ALAN KAHN, derivatively on behalf                            Civil Action No. \ 7 773 lJc
    of nominal defendant The Student Loan Corp.,
    
                                   Plaintiff,
    
           - against -
    
    CITIGROUP, INC., CITIBANK (NEW
    YORK STATE), CITIBANK, N.A.,
    BILL BECKMANN, PETER M. GALLANT,                      :
    GLENDA B. GLOVER, EVELYN E. HANDLER, :
    CARL E. LEVINSON and LAURA D.
    WILLIAMSON,
    
                                   Defendants
    
           - and -
    
    THE STUDENT LOAN CORP.,
    
                                   Nominal Defendant :
    
    
    
                            STOCKHOLDERS' DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
    
           Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon personal knowledge as to himself and his own acts
    
    and upon information and belief as to all other matters as follows:
    
                                      NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
            1.        This is a stockholder derivative complaint brought on behalf of Student Loan
    
    Corporation ("Student Loan" or the "Company"), against certain Company officers and directors and
    
    Citigroup, Inc. ("Citigroup"), the 80%) controlling shareholder of the Company, arising out of the
    
    
    
    pervasive unfair self-dealing transactions between the Company and its controlling shareholder. As
    
    a result of such self-dealing, the Company's financial performance has been far less than what it
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • of nominal defendant The Student Loan Corp.,
  • - against -CITIGROUP, INC., CITIBANK, CITIBANK, N.A.,
  • STOCKHOLDERS' DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
  • Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon personal knowledge as to himself and his own acts
  • Citigroup, Inc., the 80%) controlling shareholder of the Company, arising out of the
  • pervasive unfair self-dealing transactions between the Company and its controlling
  • and the Company has been forced to incur excessive costs and expenses
  • over Student Loan's board of directors and operations to benefit itself at the expense of the
  • Company's minority shareholders, thereby causing the price of Student Loan's common stock to
  • Plaintiff Alan Kahn was at all relevant times a shareholder of Student Loan.
  • had 20,000,OOO shares outstanding, ofwhich 80% are held by Citibank (New York State), a wholly
  • CNYS owns 80% of the stock of Student
  • Through its ownership and control of 80% of the outstanding stock of the
  • CNYS and all other subsidiaries of Citigroup are referred to as "Citigroup").
  • The individual defendants consist of the six members of
  • cannot act independently of Citigroup.
  • compensation for his employment with the Company.
  • Defendant Laura D. Williamson is and has been a director of the Company
  • By virtue of their positions as directors and/or officers of Student Loan and/or their
  • $3.9 billion in original short-term borrowings and $4.3 billion in long term borrowings from
  • servicing, marketing, finance, credit and legal functions for the Company.
  • for the Company's loan portfolio for an annual fee of 75 basis points.
  • result in higher capital costs than are otherwise available to it in the public markets.
  • securitization is a funding mechanism undertaken by selling a portfolio
  • portfolios, lower interest rates, servicing costs, and capital reserve requirements, and
  • reduce its capital reserve requirements, thereby making capital available for expansion and
  • all in favor of self-dealing transactions that unfairly benefit the controlling shareholder.
  •    |